These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2127892)

  • 1. The assessment of the bactericidal activity of surface disinfectants. III. Practical tests for surface disinfection.
    Reybrouck G
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1990 Dec; 190(5-6):500-10. PubMed ID: 2127892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The assessment of the bactericidal activity of surface disinfectants. II. Two other practical tests.
    Reybrouck G
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1990 Dec; 190(5-6):492-9. PubMed ID: 2127891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The assessment of the bactericidal activity of surface disinfectants. I. A comparison of three practical tests.
    Reybrouck G
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1990 Dec; 190(5-6):479-91. PubMed ID: 2127890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The assessment of the bactericidal activity of surface disinfectants. IV. The AOAC use-dilution method and the Kelsey-Sykes test.
    Reybrouck G
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1992 Feb; 192(5):432-7. PubMed ID: 1554401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The assessment of the bactericidal activity of surface disinfectants. V. Correlation of the tests with practice.
    Reybrouck G
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1992 Feb; 192(5):438-46. PubMed ID: 1554402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The determination of the bacterial effectiveness of surface disinfectants using suspension tests].
    Reybrouck G
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1991 Mar; 191(2-3):206-15. PubMed ID: 2059284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Bactericidal efficacy of a disinfectant by AFNOR standards NF T 72-150 and NF T 72-151. A collaborative study].
    Chantefort A; Lellouche M
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1984 Jun; 32(5 Pt 2):623-7. PubMed ID: 6431382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Quantitative recovery of bacteria from different germ carrier materials].
    Hunger W; Höller C; Gundermann KO
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1990 May; 190(1-2):141-53. PubMed ID: 2118354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative evaluation of biofilm disinfectant efficacy tests.
    Buckingham-Meyer K; Goeres DM; Hamilton MA
    J Microbiol Methods; 2007 Aug; 70(2):236-44. PubMed ID: 17524505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Evaluating the effect of quaternary ammonium disinfectants on bacterial strains of animal origin].
    Rueda J; Amigot Lázaro JA; Ducha J
    Rev Sci Tech; 2003 Dec; 22(3):1097-104. PubMed ID: 15005566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of the quantitative suspension tests for the assessment of disinfectants.
    Reybrouck G
    Zentralbl Bakteriol B Hyg Krankenhaushyg Betriebshyg Prav Med; 1980; 170(5-6):449-56. PubMed ID: 6775457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A quantitative test method for the examination of antimycobacterial disinfection procedures.
    Hingst V; Wurster C; Sonntag HG
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1990 May; 190(1-2):127-40. PubMed ID: 2393486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Suitability of two commercial preparations for disinfections against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in veterinary medicine.
    Yilmaz A; Kaleta EF
    Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2009 May; 116(5):180-5. PubMed ID: 19462641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Evaluation of the efficacy of a peroxide system (VIRKON) with special reference to in vitro kinetics of disinfection].
    Gasparini R
    Ann Ig; 1995; 7(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 8663960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Evaluation of a micromethod for the bactericidal activity of five disinfectants on 108 hospital strains].
    Dusseau JY; Chapalain JC; Rouby Y; Reverdy ME; Bartoli M
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1993 Apr; 41(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 8233634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Bacterial strains resistant to disinfectants].
    Finzi GF; Domeniconi W; Porcari L
    Arch Sci Med (Torino); 1980; 137(3):495-8. PubMed ID: 6786257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Household cleaning and surface disinfection: new insights and strategies.
    Exner M; Vacata V; Hornei B; Dietlein E; Gebel J
    J Hosp Infect; 2004 Apr; 56 Suppl 2():S70-5. PubMed ID: 15110127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors affecting the bactericidal action of disinfectants. Implications for selection of resistant strains.
    Cremieux A
    Drugs Exp Clin Res; 1986; 12(11):899-903. PubMed ID: 3816506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Microbiological contamination of disinfectants used in hospitals for the disinfection of medical instruments. Part II: The estimation of sensitivity of isolated strains of bacteria in disinfectants].
    Krzywicka H; Janowska J; Tadeusiak B; Zarzycka E
    Przegl Epidemiol; 1995; 49(1-2):55-63. PubMed ID: 7676061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Suitability of chemical neutralizers applied for disinfection control on commercial animal husbandry objects].
    Bineva I; Karadzhov S
    Vet Med Nauki; 1979; 16(6):35-41. PubMed ID: 120995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.