These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21279484)

  • 1. High revision rate at 5 years after hip resurfacing with the Durom implant.
    Naal FD; Pilz R; Munzinger U; Hersche O; Leunig M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2011 Sep; 469(9):2598-604. PubMed ID: 21279484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are Females at Greater Risk for Revision Surgery After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty With the Articular Surface Replacement Prosthesis?
    Donahue GS; Lindgren V; Galea VP; Madanat R; Muratoglu O; Malchau H
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2257-65. PubMed ID: 27121872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Poor Survivorship and Frequent Complications at a Median of 10 Years After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Revision.
    Matharu GS; Pandit HG; Murray DW
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 475(2):304-314. PubMed ID: 27188835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frequent femoral neck osteolysis with Birmingham mid-head resection resurfacing arthroplasty in young patients.
    Asaad A; Hart A; Khoo MM; Ilo K; Schaller G; Black JD; Muirhead-Allwood S
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3770-8. PubMed ID: 25981716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What is the midterm survivorship and function after hip resurfacing?
    Rahman L; Muirhead-Allwood SK; Alkinj M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Dec; 468(12):3221-7. PubMed ID: 20574804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High Survivorship With Cementless Stems and Cortical Strut Allografts for Large Femoral Bone Defects in Revision THA.
    Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS; Rastogi D
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Sep; 473(9):2990-3000. PubMed ID: 26013152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ceramic-on-ceramic THA Implants in Patients Younger Than 20 Years.
    Hannouche D; Devriese F; Delambre J; Zadegan F; Tourabaly I; Sedel L; Chevret S; Nizard R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):520-7. PubMed ID: 26341897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can a Conical Implant Successfully Address Complex Anatomy in Primary THA? Radiographs and Hip Scores at Early Followup.
    Zhang Q; Goodman SB; Maloney WJ; Huddleston JI
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):459-64. PubMed ID: 26245165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What Is the Survivorship of Revision Surgery Performed for the Chronically Dislocated THA?
    Brown TS; McLaughlin RJ; Berry DJ; Lewallen DG; Trousdale RT; Sierra RJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Feb; 477(2):374-379. PubMed ID: 30794225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical and radiographic results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with a minimum ten-year follow-up.
    Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ; Campbell PA; Gruen TA; Wisk LE
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Nov; 92(16):2663-71. PubMed ID: 21084576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Failure of the Durom Metasul acetabular component.
    Long WT; Dastane M; Harris MJ; Wan Z; Dorr LD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Feb; 468(2):400-5. PubMed ID: 19727987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What Is the Rerevision Rate After Revising a Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? Analysis From the AOANJRR.
    Wong JM; Liu YL; Graves S; de Steiger R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3458-64. PubMed ID: 25721576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do alumina matrix composite bearings decrease hip noises and bearing fractures at a minimum of 5 years after THA?
    Baek SH; Kim WK; Kim JY; Kim SY
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3796-802. PubMed ID: 26126991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultrashort versus Conventional Anatomic Cementless Femoral Stems in the Same Patients Younger Than 55 Years.
    Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Sep; 474(9):2008-17. PubMed ID: 27260482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adverse Reactions to Metal on Metal Are Not Exclusive to Large Heads in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Lombardi AV; Berend KR; Adams JB; Satterwhite KL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):432-40. PubMed ID: 26497881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The outcomes of hip resurfacing compared to standard primary total hip arthroplasty in Men.
    Issa K; Palich A; Tatevossian T; Kapadia BH; Naziri Q; Mont MA
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2013 May; 14():161. PubMed ID: 23656900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hip resurfacing before 50years of age: A prospective study of 979 hips with a mean follow-up of 5.1years.
    Girard J; Lons A; Ramdane N; Putman S
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 May; 104(3):295-299. PubMed ID: 29277514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcomes After Metal-on-metal Hip Revision Surgery Depend on the Reason for Failure: A Propensity Score-matched Study.
    Matharu GS; Judge A; Murray DW; Pandit HG
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):245-258. PubMed ID: 29529653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do survival rate and serum ion concentrations 10 years after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing provide evidence for continued use?
    Hartmann A; Lützner J; Kirschner S; Witzleb WC; Günther KP
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Nov; 470(11):3118-26. PubMed ID: 22481276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hip resurfacing results for osteonecrosis are as good as for other etiologies at 2 to 12 years.
    Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Feb; 468(2):375-81. PubMed ID: 19756906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.