BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

496 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21279504)

  • 1. Fracture risk prediction using FRAX®: a 10-year follow-up survey of the Japanese Population-Based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Cohort Study.
    Tamaki J; Iki M; Kadowaki E; Sato Y; Kajita E; Kagamimori S; Kagawa Y; Yoneshima H
    Osteoporos Int; 2011 Dec; 22(12):3037-45. PubMed ID: 21279504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rationale of the Spanish FRAX model in decision-making for predicting osteoporotic fractures: an update of FRIDEX cohort of Spanish women.
    Azagra R; Zwart M; Encabo G; Aguyé A; Martin-Sánchez JC; Puchol-Ruiz N; Gabriel-Escoda P; Ortiz-Alinque S; Gené E; Iglesias M; Moriña D; Diaz-Herrera MA; Utzet M; Manresa JM;
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Jun; 17():262. PubMed ID: 27317560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fracture prediction and calibration of a Canadian FRAX® tool: a population-based report from CaMos.
    Fraser LA; Langsetmo L; Berger C; Ioannidis G; Goltzman D; Adachi JD; Papaioannou A; Josse R; Kovacs CS; Olszynski WP; Towheed T; Hanley DA; Kaiser SM; Prior J; Jamal S; Kreiger N; Brown JP; Johansson H; Oden A; McCloskey E; Kanis JA; Leslie WD;
    Osteoporos Int; 2011 Mar; 22(3):829-37. PubMed ID: 21161508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. FRAX® tool, the WHO algorithm to predict osteoporotic fractures: the first analysis of its discriminative and predictive ability in the Spanish FRIDEX cohort.
    Azagra R; Roca G; Encabo G; Aguyé A; Zwart M; Güell S; Puchol N; Gene E; Casado E; Sancho P; Solà S; Torán P; Iglesias M; Gisbert MC; López-Expósito F; Pujol-Salud J; Fernandez-Hermida Y; Puente A; Rosàs M; Bou V; Antón JJ; Lansdberg G; Martín-Sánchez JC; Díez-Pérez A; Prieto-Alhambra D
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2012 Oct; 13():204. PubMed ID: 23088223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Construction of a FRAX® model for the assessment of fracture probability in Canada and implications for treatment.
    Leslie WD; Lix LM; Langsetmo L; Berger C; Goltzman D; Hanley DA; Adachi JD; Johansson H; Oden A; McCloskey E; Kanis JA
    Osteoporos Int; 2011 Mar; 22(3):817-27. PubMed ID: 21161509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bone mineral density enhances use of clinical risk factors in predicting ten-year risk of osteoporotic fractures in Chinese men: the Hong Kong Osteoporosis Study.
    Bow CH; Tsang SW; Loong CH; Soong CS; Yeung SC; Kung AW
    Osteoporos Int; 2011 Nov; 22(11):2799-807. PubMed ID: 21234548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital X-ray radiogrammetry in the study of osteoporotic fractures: Comparison to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and FRAX.
    Kälvesten J; Lui LY; Brismar T; Cummings S
    Bone; 2016 May; 86():30-5. PubMed ID: 26921822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) and for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in Japanese middle-aged and elderly women: Chiba bone survey.
    Oka R; Ohira M; Suzuki S; Yoshida T; Koide H; Tanaka T; Tatsuno I
    Endocr J; 2018 Feb; 65(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 29151451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spine bone texture assessed by trabecular bone score (TBS) predicts osteoporotic fractures in men: the Manitoba Bone Density Program.
    Leslie WD; Aubry-Rozier B; Lix LM; Morin SN; Majumdar SR; Hans D
    Bone; 2014 Oct; 67():10-4. PubMed ID: 24998455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trabecular bone score may improve FRAX® prediction accuracy for major osteoporotic fractures in elderly Japanese men: the Fujiwara-kyo Osteoporosis Risk in Men (FORMEN) Cohort Study.
    Iki M; Fujita Y; Tamaki J; Kouda K; Yura A; Sato Y; Moon JS; Winzenrieth R; Okamoto N; Kurumatani N
    Osteoporos Int; 2015 Jun; 26(6):1841-8. PubMed ID: 25752623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fracture Risk Indices From DXA-Based Finite Element Analysis Predict Incident Fractures Independently From FRAX: The Manitoba BMD Registry.
    Leslie WD; Luo Y; Yang S; Goertzen AL; Ahmed S; Delubac I; Lix LM
    J Clin Densitom; 2019; 22(3):338-345. PubMed ID: 30852033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fracture risk prediction in outpatients from Krakow Region using FRAX tool versus fracture risk in 11-year follow-up.
    Czerwiński E; Borowy P; Kumorek A; Amarowicz J; Górkiewicz M; Milert A
    Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2013; 15(6):617-28. PubMed ID: 24662908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) improve the predictive ability of FRAX
    Tamaki J; Iki M; Sato Y; Winzenrieth R; Kajita E; Kagamimori S;
    J Bone Miner Metab; 2019 Jan; 37(1):161-170. PubMed ID: 29468478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High fracture probability with FRAX usually indicates densitometric osteoporosis: implications for clinical practice.
    Leslie WD; Majumdar SR; Lix LM; Johansson H; Oden A; McCloskey E; Kanis JA;
    Osteoporos Int; 2012 Jan; 23(1):391-7. PubMed ID: 21365460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. FREM predicts 10-year incident fracture risk independent of FRAX® probability: a registry-based cohort study.
    Leslie WD; Möller S; Skjødt MK; Yan L; Abrahamsen B; Lix LM; McCloskey EV; Johansson H; Harvey NC; Kanis JA; Rubin KH
    Osteoporos Int; 2022 Jul; 33(7):1457-1463. PubMed ID: 35175395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How well do the FRAX (Australia) and Garvan calculators predict incident fractures? Data from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study.
    Holloway-Kew KL; Zhang Y; Betson AG; Anderson KB; Hans D; Hyde NK; Nicholson GC; Pocock NA; Kotowicz MA; Pasco JA
    Osteoporos Int; 2019 Oct; 30(10):2129-2139. PubMed ID: 31317250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. FRAX provides robust fracture prediction regardless of socioeconomic status.
    Brennan SL; Leslie WD; Lix LM; Johansson H; Oden A; McCloskey E; Kanis JA
    Osteoporos Int; 2014 Jan; 25(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 24190425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Establish and validate the reliability of predictive models in bone mineral density by deep learning as examination tool for women.
    Hung WC; Lin YL; Cheng TT; Chin WL; Tu LT; Chen CK; Yang CH; Wu CH
    Osteoporos Int; 2024 Jan; 35(1):129-141. PubMed ID: 37728768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Discriminative value of FRAX for fracture prediction in a cohort of Chinese postmenopausal women.
    Cheung EY; Bow CH; Cheung CL; Soong C; Yeung S; Loong C; Kung A
    Osteoporos Int; 2012 Mar; 23(3):871-8. PubMed ID: 21562875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. FRAX for fracture prediction shorter and longer than 10 years: the Manitoba BMD registry.
    Leslie WD; Majumdar SR; Morin SN; Lix LM; Johansson H; Oden A; McCloskey EV; Kanis JA
    Osteoporos Int; 2017 Sep; 28(9):2557-2564. PubMed ID: 28593449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.