BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21279959)

  • 1. Choosing the optimum swab for canal drying in cemented total hip replacement.
    Cutts S; Pasapula CS; Modi NR; Gwozdziewicz L; Bowers AG
    Hip Int; 2011; 21(1):107-11. PubMed ID: 21279959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cement restrictor function below the femoral isthmus.
    Moran M; Heisel C; Rupp R; Simpson AH; Breusch SJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 May; 458():111-6. PubMed ID: 17206103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro performance of intramedullary cement restrictors in total hip arthroplasty.
    Heisel C; Norman T; Rupp R; Pritsch M; Ewerbeck V; Breusch SJ
    J Biomech; 2003 Jun; 36(6):835-43. PubMed ID: 12742451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of two pressurisers for cementation of the proximal femur.
    Morishima T; Choy GG; Crawford RW; Wilson LJ
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2014 Aug; 22(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 25163947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Air permeable diaphyseal obturators: efficacity of femoral cementing and prevention of associated cardiovascular disorders].
    Caton J; Prudhon JL; Aslanian T; Lifante JC; Ritz B
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2002 Dec; 88(8):767-76. PubMed ID: 12503018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cement removal and bone bed preparation of the femoral medullary canal assisted by flexible endoscope in total hip revision arthroplasty.
    Takagi M; Tamaki Y; Kobayashi S; Sasaki K; Takakubo Y; Ishii M
    J Orthop Sci; 2009 Nov; 14(6):719-26. PubMed ID: 19997818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of modular neck variation on bone and cement mantle mechanics around a total hip arthroplasty stem.
    Simpson DJ; Little JP; Gray H; Murray DW; Gill HS
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Mar; 24(3):274-85. PubMed ID: 19263573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The timing of femoral component insertion in cemented hip arthroplasty.
    McWilliams TG; Binns MS
    J Arthroplasty; 2003 Jan; 18(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 12555183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cemented femoral fixation: the North Atlantic divide.
    Murray DW
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Nov; 95-B(11 Suppl A):51-2. PubMed ID: 24187352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of undersizing on the long-term stability of the Exeter hip stem: A comparative in vitro study.
    Cristofolini L; Erani P; Bialoblocka-Juszczyk E; Ohashi H; Iida S; Minato I; Viceconti M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 Nov; 25(9):899-908. PubMed ID: 20659780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Femoral impaction bone grafting in revision hip arthroplasty: 705 cases from the originating centre.
    Wilson MJ; Hook S; Whitehouse SL; Timperley AJ; Gie GA
    Bone Joint J; 2016 Dec; 98-B(12):1611-1619. PubMed ID: 27909122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of fixation of the femoral component without cement and fixation with use of a bone-vacuum cementing technique for the prevention of fat embolism during total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized clinical trial.
    Pitto RP; Koessler M; Kuehle JW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Jun; 81(6):831-43. PubMed ID: 10391548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of cement introduction and pressurization techniques.
    Dunne NJ; Orr JF; Beverland DE
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2004; 218(1):11-25. PubMed ID: 14982342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Primary aseptic revision of the femoral component of a cemented total hip arthroplasty using a cemented technique without bone graft.
    Bardou-Jacquet J; Souillac V; Mouton A; Chauveaux D
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Jun; 95(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 19523892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Satisfactory Results of the Exeter Revision Femoral Stem Used for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Desy NM; Johnson JD; Sierra RJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Feb; 32(2):494-498. PubMed ID: 27600303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A novel technique for femoral canal occlusion during cement pressurization in proximal femoral arthroplasty.
    Holt G; Panousis K; Mohammed A; Patil S; Meek RM
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jan; 27(1):129-33. PubMed ID: 22152980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Enhancing proximal femoral pressure during cemented stem insertion.
    Budnar VM; Bannister GC
    Hip Int; 2012; 22(3):302-6. PubMed ID: 22740281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Femoral preparation in cemented total hip arthroplasty: reaming or broaching?
    DiGiovanni CW; Garvin KL; Pellicci PM
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 1999; 7(6):349-57. PubMed ID: 11497488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The cement mantle in femoral impaction allografting. A comparison of three systems from four centres.
    Masterson EL; Masri BA; Duncan CP; Rosenberg A; Cabanela M; Gross M
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1997 Nov; 79(6):908-13. PubMed ID: 9393902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reaming versus broaching in cemented hip arthroplasty: mechanical stability in cadaver femora.
    Ioannidis TT; Apostolou CD; Korres DS; Papaletsos I; Gandaifis ND; Panagopoulos CN; Agathocleous PE
    Acta Orthop; 2005 Jun; 76(3):326-30. PubMed ID: 16156458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.