117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21279959)
21. Femoral stem impaction grafting: extending the role of cement.
Gehrke T; Gebauer M; Kendoff D
Bone Joint J; 2013 Nov; 95-B(11 Suppl A):92-4. PubMed ID: 24187362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Inferior stability of a biodegradable cement plug. 122 total hip replacements randomized to degradable or non-degradable cement restrictor.
Schauss SM; Hinz M; Mayr E; Bach CM; Krismer M; Fischer M
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2006 Jul; 126(5):324-9. PubMed ID: 16612619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Revision of the cemented femoral stem using a cement-in-cement technique: a five- to 15-year review.
Duncan WW; Hubble MJ; Howell JR; Whitehouse SL; Timperley AJ; Gie GA
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 May; 91(5):577-82. PubMed ID: 19407288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A rough surface finish adversely affects the survivorship of a cemented femoral stem.
Della Valle AG; Zoppi A; Peterson MG; Salvati EA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2005 Jul; (436):158-63. PubMed ID: 15995435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Femoral canal occlusion in total hip replacement using a resorbable and flexible cement restrictor.
Bulstra SK; Geesink RG; Bakker D; Bulstra TH; Bouwmeester SJ; van der Linden AJ
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1996 Nov; 78(6):892-8. PubMed ID: 8951002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Fracture of the precoated femoral component after cemented total hip arthroplasty.
Yamasaki S; Masuhara K; Fuji T
J Orthop Sci; 2006 May; 11(3):308-11. PubMed ID: 16721536
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Effects of pre-cooling and pre-heating procedures on cement polymerisation and thermal osteonecrosis in cemented hip replacements [Medical Engineering & Physics 25 (2003) 559-64].
Talbot JC; Shaw DL
Med Eng Phys; 2005 Jun; 27(5):439; author reply 441-2. PubMed ID: 15863352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Re-design of the Exeter V40 long-stem femoral component for ease of removal.
Tevelen GA; Pearcy MJ; Crawford RW
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2007 Feb; 221(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 17385573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Thin cement mantles surrounding femoral hip implants might not be deleterious in all cases.
Scheerlinck T; Janssen D; Verdonschot N
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 May; 23(4):500-1; author reply 501-3. PubMed ID: 18207616
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Technique for a composite femoral intramedullary plug in cemented hip arthroplasty.
Owens P; Lavernia CJ
J Arthroplasty; 1999 Apr; 14(3):369-71. PubMed ID: 10220192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Uncompromised quality of the cement mantle in Exeter femoral components implanted through a minimally-invasive direct anterior approach. A prospective, randomised cadaver study.
Mayr E; Krismer M; Ertl M; Kessler O; Thaler M; Nogler M
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Sep; 88(9):1252-6. PubMed ID: 16943482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The cement mantle of femoral hip implants is more influenced by stem-broach sizing than by shape: an in vitro CT analysis of straight Charnley-Kerboul and anatomic Lubinus SPII stems.
Scheerlinck T; de Mey J; Deklerck R
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Nov; 129(11):1473-81. PubMed ID: 19198861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A comparison of distal canal restrictors in primary cemented femoral hip arthroplasty.
Smith EL; Wohlrab KP; Matzkin EG; Providence BC
Orthopedics; 2004 Aug; 27(8):847-51. PubMed ID: 15369006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Influence of bone density on the cement fixation of femoral hip resurfacing components.
Bitsch RG; Jäger S; Lürssen M; Loidolt T; Schmalzried TP; Clarius M
J Orthop Res; 2010 Aug; 28(8):986-91. PubMed ID: 20162694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Mechanical stability of total hip replacement using pressurization of bone cement during curing: push-out tests in cadaver femora.
Apostolou CD; Yiannakopoulos CK; Ioannidis TT; Papagelopoulos PJ; Korres D
Orthopedics; 2007 Dec; 30(12):1028-32. PubMed ID: 18198774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Long-term femoral bone remodeling after cemented hip arthroplasty with the Müller straight stem in the operated and nonoperated femora.
Stucinskas J; Clauss M; Tarasevicius S; Wingstrand H; Ilchmann T
J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jun; 27(6):927-33. PubMed ID: 22085798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Long-term survival of the cemented Müller CDH stem: a minimum follow-up of 10 years.
Salentiny Y; Zwicky L; Ochsner PE; Clauss M
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2018 Oct; 138(10):1471-1477. PubMed ID: 30046893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Patient-specific finite element analysis of femurs with cemented hip implants.
Katz Y; Lubovsky O; Yosibash Z
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Oct; 58():74-89. PubMed ID: 30053643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The Exeter Universal cemented femoral stem at 20 to 25 years: A report of 382 hips.
Petheram TG; Whitehouse SL; Kazi HA; Hubble MJ; Timperley AJ; Wilson MJ; Howell JR
Bone Joint J; 2016 Nov; 98-B(11):1441-1449. PubMed ID: 27803218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Femoral impaction bone allografting with an Exeter cemented collarless, polished, tapered stem in revision hip replacement: a mean follow-up of 10.5 years.
Wraighte PJ; Howard PW
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Aug; 90(8):1000-4. PubMed ID: 18669953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
