147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21279963)
1. Cemented impaction grafting with moulded intramedullary mesh for femoral stem revision--long-term results.
Girard J; Riera P; Pearce O; Duquennoy A; Migaud H
Hip Int; 2011; 21(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 21279963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Femoral impaction allografting for significant bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty.
Goff TAJ; Bobak P
Hip Int; 2017 May; 27(3):281-285. PubMed ID: 28165587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impaction allografting with cement for revision of the femoral component. A minimum four-year follow-up study with use of a precoated femoral stem.
Leopold SS; Berger RA; Rosenberg AG; Jacobs JJ; Quigley LR; Galante JO
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Aug; 81(8):1080-92. PubMed ID: 10466641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Femoral impaction bone allografting with an Exeter cemented collarless, polished, tapered stem in revision hip replacement: a mean follow-up of 10.5 years.
Wraighte PJ; Howard PW
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Aug; 90(8):1000-4. PubMed ID: 18669953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reduced femoral component subsidence with improved impaction grafting at revision hip arthroplasty.
Howie DW; Callary SA; McGee MA; Russell NC; Solomon LB
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Dec; 468(12):3314-21. PubMed ID: 20680531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impaction grafting in the femur in cementless modular revision total hip arthroplasty: a descriptive outcome analysis of 243 cases with the MRP-TITAN revision implant.
Wimmer MD; Randau TM; Deml MC; Ascherl R; Nöth U; Forst R; Gravius N; Wirtz D; Gravius S
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2013 Jan; 14():19. PubMed ID: 23311769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Femoral impaction bone grafting in revision hip arthroplasty: 705 cases from the originating centre.
Wilson MJ; Hook S; Whitehouse SL; Timperley AJ; Gie GA
Bone Joint J; 2016 Dec; 98-B(12):1611-1619. PubMed ID: 27909122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A 3- to 18-Year Follow-Up of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With Impacted Bone Allografts and Cemented Lubinus SP II Stem. Clinical, Radiographic, and Survivorship Analysis With Comparison to the Literature.
Stigbrand H; Ullmark G
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Sep; 32(9):2810-2814. PubMed ID: 28529108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Clinical-radiological evaluation of the impaction allografting and cemented rod technique in revision knee surgery].
Mateo-Negreira J; López-Cuello P; Pipa-Muñiz I; Rodríguez García N; Murcia-Mazón A; Suárez-Suárez MA
Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol; 2016; 60(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 26655209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impaction allografting with cement for extensive femoral bone loss in revision hip surgery: a 4- to 8-year follow-up study.
Fetzer GB; Callaghan JJ; Templeton JE; Goetz DD; Sullivan PM; Johnston RC
J Arthroplasty; 2001 Dec; 16(8 Suppl 1):195-202. PubMed ID: 11742475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Revision total hip arthroplasty using impaction bone grafting with cemented nonpolished stems and charnley cups.
Boldt JG; Dilawari P; Agarwal S; Drabu KJ
J Arthroplasty; 2001 Dec; 16(8):943-52. PubMed ID: 11740747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High Survivorship With Cementless Stems and Cortical Strut Allografts for Large Femoral Bone Defects in Revision THA.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS; Rastogi D
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Sep; 473(9):2990-3000. PubMed ID: 26013152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mechanisms of stem subsidence in femoral impaction allografting.
Albert C; Frei H; Duncan C; Fernlund G
Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 2011; 39(6):493-510. PubMed ID: 22196223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impaction bone-grafting before insertion of a femoral stem with cement in revision total hip arthroplasty. A minimum two-year follow-up study.
Meding JB; Ritter MA; Keating EM; Faris PM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Dec; 79(12):1834-41. PubMed ID: 9409797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Primary aseptic revision of the femoral component of a cemented total hip arthroplasty using a cemented technique without bone graft.
Bardou-Jacquet J; Souillac V; Mouton A; Chauveaux D
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Jun; 95(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 19523892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of femoral struts and impacted cancellous bone allograft in patients with severe femoral bone loss who undergo revision total hip replacement: a three- to nine-year follow-up.
Buttaro MA; Costantini J; Comba F; Piccaluga F
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Feb; 94(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 22323680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Isolated acetabular revision with femoral stem retention after bipolar hip arthroplasty.
Kaku N; Tabata T; Tagomori H; Tsumura H
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2017 Mar; 137(3):425-430. PubMed ID: 28150224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term Follow-up Results of Femoral Revision Hip Arthroplasty Using Impaction Bone Grafting and Standard Cemented Polished Stem.
Park JS; Kweon SH; Kang SJ; Jo YH
Clin Orthop Surg; 2023 Oct; 15(5):734-739. PubMed ID: 37811512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. THA revisions using impaction allografting with mesh is durable for medial but not lateral acetabular defects.
García-Rey E; Madero R; García-Cimbrelo E
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3882-91. PubMed ID: 26245166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The fate of stable cemented acetabular components retained during revision of a femoral component of a total hip arthroplasty.
Berger RA; Quigley LR; Jacobs JJ; Sheinkop MB; Rosenberg AG; Galante JO
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Dec; 81(12):1682-91. PubMed ID: 10608379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
