91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21280988)
1. Poor agreement between operators on grading of the placenta.
Moran M; Ryan J; Higgins M; Brennan PC; McAuliffe FM
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2011; 31(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 21280988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intraobserver and interobserver variation in the sonographic grading of placental maturity.
Sau A; Seed P; Langford K
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Apr; 23(4):374-7. PubMed ID: 15065188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reproducibility of placental maturity grade classification using a dynamic ultrasonography.
Delle Donne RD; Araujo Júnior E; Rolo LC; Bruns RF
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Apr; 30(8):987-989. PubMed ID: 27245764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The prediction of pouch of Douglas obliteration using offline analysis of the transvaginal ultrasound 'sliding sign' technique: inter- and intra-observer reproducibility.
Reid S; Lu C; Casikar I; Mein B; Magotti R; Ludlow J; Benzie R; Condous G
Hum Reprod; 2013 May; 28(5):1237-46. PubMed ID: 23482338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of data acquisition for three-dimensional power Doppler angiography of the whole placenta at 12 weeks gestation.
Jones NW; Raine-Fenning N; Mousa H; Bradley E; Bugg G
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Sep; 36(9):1405-11. PubMed ID: 20800167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the sonographic assessment of fatty liver.
Strauss S; Gavish E; Gottlieb P; Katsnelson L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Dec; 189(6):W320-3. PubMed ID: 18029843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interobserver variability of sonography for prediction of placenta accreta.
Bowman ZS; Eller AG; Kennedy AM; Richards DS; Winter TC; Woodward PJ; Silver RM
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Dec; 33(12):2153-8. PubMed ID: 25425372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intra- and interobserver agreement with regard to describing adnexal masses using International Ovarian Tumor Analysis terminology: reproducibility study involving seven observers.
Zannoni L; Savelli L; Jokubkiene L; Di Legge A; Condous G; Testa AC; Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 44(1):100-8. PubMed ID: 24307182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Two-dimensional multiplanar and three-dimensional volume-rendered vascular CT in pancreatic carcinoma: interobserver agreement and comparison with standard helical techniques.
Baek SY; Sheafor DH; Keogan MT; DeLong DM; Nelson RC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Jun; 176(6):1467-73. PubMed ID: 11373215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of pelvic floor measurements on three- and four-dimensional ultrasound during and after first pregnancy: implications for training.
van Veelen GA; Schweitzer KJ; van der Vaart CH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Nov; 42(5):590-5. PubMed ID: 23729398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective assessment of interobserver agreement for defecography in fecal incontinence.
Dobben AC; Wiersma TG; Janssen LW; de Vos R; Terra MP; Baeten CG; Stoker J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Nov; 185(5):1166-72. PubMed ID: 16247127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Observer agreement analysis of MRI grading of knee osteoarthritis.
McNicholas MJ; Brooksbank AJ; Walker CM
J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1999 Feb; 44(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 10079665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Repeatability and reproducibility of the Obel grading system for equine laminitis.
Menzies-Gow NJ; Stevens KB; Sepulveda MF; Jarvis N; Marr CM
Vet Rec; 2010 Jul; 167(2):52-5. PubMed ID: 20622203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional Doppler evaluation of single spherical samples from the placenta: intra- and interobserver reliability.
Martins WP; Lima JC; Welsh AW; Araujo Júnior E; Miyague AH; Filho FM; Raine-Fenning NJ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Aug; 40(2):200-6. PubMed ID: 22173929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Placental Distal Villous Hypoplasia Pattern: Interobserver Agreement and Automated Fractal Dimension as an Objective Metric.
Mukherjee A; Chan AD; Keating S; Redline RW; Fritsch MK; Machin GA; Cornejo-Palma D; de Nanassy J; El-Demellawy D; von Dadelszen P; Benton SJ; Grynspan D
Pediatr Dev Pathol; 2016; 19(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 26275121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intra- and interobserver variability of 2D and 3D transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of benign versus malignant adnexal masses.
Pascual MA; Graupera B; Hereter L; Rotili A; Rodriguez I; Alcázar JL
J Clin Ultrasound; 2011 Jul; 39(6):316-21. PubMed ID: 21500198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of measurement process of placental volume in early pregnancy: an interobserver reliability study.
Florido J; Ocón O; Luna del Castillo Jde D; Vega-Cañadas J; Manrique-Espinoza N; Navarrete L
J Perinat Med; 2014 Sep; 42(5):559-64. PubMed ID: 24515996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the reliability of two hydronephrosis grading systems: the Society for Foetal Urology grading system vs. the Onen grading system.
Kim SY; Kim MJ; Yoon CS; Lee MS; Han KH; Lee MJ
Clin Radiol; 2013 Sep; 68(9):e484-90. PubMed ID: 23684519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computerized assessment of placental calcification post-ultrasound: a novel software tool.
Moran M; Higgins M; Zombori G; Ryan J; McAuliffe FM
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 May; 41(5):545-9. PubMed ID: 22858982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Frontomaxillary facial angle measurement at 11-14 weeks: assessment of interobserver and intraobserver agreement in 2D and 3D imaging.
Alphonse J; Cox J; Clarke JL; Robinson CL; Schluter PJ; McLennan A
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2013; 34(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 23751732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
