These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21281271)

  • 1. A comparison of association methods correcting for population stratification in case-control studies.
    Wu C; DeWan A; Hoh J; Wang Z
    Ann Hum Genet; 2011 May; 75(3):418-27. PubMed ID: 21281271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ROADTRIPS: case-control association testing with partially or completely unknown population and pedigree structure.
    Thornton T; McPeek MS
    Am J Hum Genet; 2010 Feb; 86(2):172-84. PubMed ID: 20137780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of population stratification adjustment using genome-wide or exonic variants.
    Chen Y; Peloso GM; Liu CT; DeStefano AL; Dupuis J
    Genet Epidemiol; 2020 Oct; 44(7):702-716. PubMed ID: 32608112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accounting for population stratification in DNA methylation studies.
    Barfield RT; Almli LM; Kilaru V; Smith AK; Mercer KB; Duncan R; Klengel T; Mehta D; Binder EB; Epstein MP; Ressler KJ; Conneely KN
    Genet Epidemiol; 2014 Apr; 38(3):231-41. PubMed ID: 24478250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of population-based association study methods correcting for population stratification.
    Zhang F; Wang Y; Deng HW
    PLoS One; 2008; 3(10):e3392. PubMed ID: 18852890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals.
    Alexander DH; Novembre J; Lange K
    Genome Res; 2009 Sep; 19(9):1655-64. PubMed ID: 19648217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robust inference of population structure for ancestry prediction and correction of stratification in the presence of relatedness.
    Conomos MP; Miller MB; Thornton TA
    Genet Epidemiol; 2015 May; 39(4):276-93. PubMed ID: 25810074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A mixed model reduces spurious genetic associations produced by population stratification in genome-wide association studies.
    Shin J; Lee C
    Genomics; 2015 Apr; 105(4):191-6. PubMed ID: 25640449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing for genetic association in the presence of population stratification in genome-wide association studies.
    Wang K
    Genet Epidemiol; 2009 Nov; 33(7):637-45. PubMed ID: 19235185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robust methods for population stratification in genome wide association studies.
    Liu L; Zhang D; Liu H; Arendt C
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Apr; 14():132. PubMed ID: 23601181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clustering by genetic ancestry using genome-wide SNP data.
    Solovieff N; Hartley SW; Baldwin CT; Perls TT; Steinberg MH; Sebastiani P
    BMC Genet; 2010 Dec; 11():108. PubMed ID: 21143920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Controlling for human population stratification in rare variant association studies.
    Bouaziz M; Mullaert J; Bigio B; Seeleuthner Y; Casanova JL; Alcais A; Abel L; Cobat A
    Sci Rep; 2021 Sep; 11(1):19015. PubMed ID: 34561511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Double genomic control is not effective to correct for population stratification in meta-analysis for genome-wide association studies.
    Wang S; Chen W; Chen X; Hu F; Archer KJ; Liu HN; Sun S; Gao G
    Front Genet; 2012; 3():300. PubMed ID: 23269928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of mixed model based approaches for correcting for population substructure with application to extreme phenotype sampling.
    Onifade M; Roy-Gagnon MH; Parent MÉ; Burkett KM
    BMC Genomics; 2022 Feb; 23(1):98. PubMed ID: 35120458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Choice of population structure informative principal components for adjustment in a case-control study.
    Peloso GM; Lunetta KL
    BMC Genet; 2011 Jul; 12():64. PubMed ID: 21771328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correcting for differential genotyping error in genetic association analysis.
    Yuan M; Fang H; Zhang H
    J Hum Genet; 2013 Oct; 58(10):657-66. PubMed ID: 23863749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of a fine-scale population stratification on rare variant association test results.
    Persyn E; Redon R; Bellanger L; Dina C
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0207677. PubMed ID: 30521541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gene Mapping in Admixed Families: A Cautionary Note on the Interpretation of the Transmission Disequilibrium Test and a Possible Solution.
    Wang X; Xiao R; Zhu X; Li M
    Hum Hered; 2016; 81(2):106-116. PubMed ID: 28076865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marbled inflation from population structure in gene-based association studies with rare variants.
    Liu Q; Nicolae DL; Chen LS
    Genet Epidemiol; 2013 Apr; 37(3):286-92. PubMed ID: 23468125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A rapid association test procedure robust under different genetic models accounting for population stratification.
    Chen W; Chen X; Archer KJ; Liu N; Li Q; Zhao Z; Sun S; Gao G
    Hum Hered; 2013; 75(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 23571404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.