These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21281493)

  • 21. DiScRIBinATE: a rapid method for accurate taxonomic classification of metagenomic sequences.
    Ghosh TS; Monzoorul Haque M; Mande SS
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Oct; 11 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):S14. PubMed ID: 21106121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A robust and accurate binning algorithm for metagenomic sequences with arbitrary species abundance ratio.
    Leung HC; Yiu SM; Yang B; Peng Y; Wang Y; Liu Z; Chen J; Qin J; Li R; Chin FY
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Jun; 27(11):1489-95. PubMed ID: 21493653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A scalable assembly-free variable selection algorithm for biomarker discovery from metagenomes.
    Gkanogiannis A; Gazut S; Salanoubat M; Kanj S; Brüls T
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Aug; 17(1):311. PubMed ID: 27542753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Introduction to the Analysis of Environmental Sequences: Metagenomics with MEGAN.
    Bağcı C; Beier S; Górska A; Huson DH
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1910():591-604. PubMed ID: 31278678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Metagenomic taxonomic classification using extreme learning machines.
    Rasheed Z; Rangwala H
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2012 Oct; 10(5):1250015. PubMed ID: 22849369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Moleculo Long-Read Sequencing Facilitates Assembly and Genomic Binning from Complex Soil Metagenomes.
    White RA; Bottos EM; Roy Chowdhury T; Zucker JD; Brislawn CJ; Nicora CD; Fansler SJ; Glaesemann KR; Glass K; Jansson JK
    mSystems; 2016; 1(3):. PubMed ID: 27822530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Rapid phylogenetic and functional classification of short genomic fragments with signature peptides.
    Berendzen J; Bruno WJ; Cohn JD; Hengartner NW; Kuske CR; McMahon BH; Wolinsky MA; Xie G
    BMC Res Notes; 2012 Aug; 5():460. PubMed ID: 22925230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Improved assemblies using a source-agnostic pipeline for MetaGenomic Assembly by Merging (MeGAMerge) of contigs.
    Scholz M; Lo CC; Chain PS
    Sci Rep; 2014 Oct; 4():6480. PubMed ID: 25270300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. CH-Bin: A convex hull based approach for binning metagenomic contigs.
    Chandrasiri S; Perera T; Dilhara A; Perera I; Mallawaarachchi V
    Comput Biol Chem; 2022 Oct; 100():107734. PubMed ID: 35964419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. HiFine: integrating Hi-C-based and shotgun-based methods to refine binning of metagenomic contigs.
    Du Y; Sun F
    Bioinformatics; 2022 May; 38(11):2973-2979. PubMed ID: 35482530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mora: abundance aware metagenomic read re-assignment for disentangling similar strains.
    Zheng A; Shaw J; Yu YW
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2024 Apr; 25(1):161. PubMed ID: 38649836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mixture models for analysis of the taxonomic composition of metagenomes.
    Meinicke P; Asshauer KP; Lingner T
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Jun; 27(12):1618-24. PubMed ID: 21546400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Resolving prokaryotic taxonomy without rRNA: longer oligonucleotide word lengths improve genome and metagenome taxonomic classification.
    Alsop EB; Raymond J
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e67337. PubMed ID: 23840870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. CAMISIM: simulating metagenomes and microbial communities.
    Fritz A; Hofmann P; Majda S; Dahms E; Dröge J; Fiedler J; Lesker TR; Belmann P; DeMaere MZ; Darling AE; Sczyrba A; Bremges A; McHardy AC
    Microbiome; 2019 Feb; 7(1):17. PubMed ID: 30736849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fragmentation and Coverage Variation in Viral Metagenome Assemblies, and Their Effect in Diversity Calculations.
    García-López R; Vázquez-Castellanos JF; Moya A
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2015; 3():141. PubMed ID: 26442255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Re-purposing software for functional characterization of the microbiome.
    Gardiner LJ; Haiminen N; Utro F; Parida L; Seabolt E; Krishna R; Kaufman JH
    Microbiome; 2021 Jan; 9(1):4. PubMed ID: 33422152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. TAMA: improved metagenomic sequence classification through meta-analysis.
    Sim M; Lee J; Lee D; Kwon D; Kim J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 May; 21(1):185. PubMed ID: 32397982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Large-scale machine learning for metagenomics sequence classification.
    Vervier K; Mahé P; Tournoud M; Veyrieras JB; Vert JP
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Apr; 32(7):1023-32. PubMed ID: 26589281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. GraphBin: refined binning of metagenomic contigs using assembly graphs.
    Mallawaarachchi V; Wickramarachchi A; Lin Y
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Jun; 36(11):3307-3313. PubMed ID: 32167528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A new metagenome binning method based on gene uniqueness.
    Kang Y; Wan C; Lu S; Fu Z; Chen AK; Lu Z
    Genes Genomics; 2020 Aug; 42(8):883-892. PubMed ID: 32506266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.