205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21282752)
1. A medium-term comparison of hybrid hip replacement and Birmingham hip resurfacing in active young patients.
Baker RP; Pollard TC; Eastaugh-Waring SJ; Bannister GC
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Feb; 93(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21282752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An 18-year comparison of hybrid total hip replacement and Birmingham hip resurfacing in active young patients.
Jonas SC; Whitehouse MR; Bick S; Bannister GC; Baker RP
Hip Int; 2019 Nov; 29(6):630-637. PubMed ID: 30672350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing.
Pollard TC; Baker RP; Eastaugh-Waring SJ; Bannister GC
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 May; 88(5):592-600. PubMed ID: 16645103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compared with 28-mm diameter metal-on-metal total hip replacement: a randomised study with six to nine years' follow-up.
Vendittoli PA; Rivière C; Roy AG; Barry J; Lusignan D; Lavigne M
Bone Joint J; 2013 Nov; 95-B(11):1464-73. PubMed ID: 24151264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Birmingham hip resurfacing at a mean of ten years: results from an independent centre.
Coulter G; Young DA; Dalziel RE; Shimmin AJ
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Mar; 94(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 22371536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical and radiographic results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with a minimum ten-year follow-up.
Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ; Campbell PA; Gruen TA; Wisk LE
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Nov; 92(16):2663-71. PubMed ID: 21084576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The outcome of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing in patients aged < 50 years up to 14 years post-operatively.
Matharu GS; McBryde CW; Pynsent WB; Pynsent PB; Treacy RB
Bone Joint J; 2013 Sep; 95-B(9):1172-7. PubMed ID: 23997127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in young patients: outcomes and activity levels at minimum ten-year follow-up.
Chana R; Facek M; Tilley S; Walter WK; Zicat B; Walter WL
Bone Joint J; 2013 Dec; 95-B(12):1603-9. PubMed ID: 24293588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The early outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: an independent Thai surgeon experiences.
Larbpaiboonpong V; Turajane T; Pragtong P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Dec; 92 Suppl 6():S134-40. PubMed ID: 20120675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ten-year clinical, radiological and metal ion analysis of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: from a single, non-designer surgeon.
Holland JP; Langton DJ; Hashmi M
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Apr; 94(4):471-6. PubMed ID: 22434461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mid-Term Results and Predictors of Patient-Reported Outcomes of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing.
Oak SR; Strnad GJ; O'Rourke C; Higuera CA; Spindler KP; Brooks PJ
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jan; 32(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 27480827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Results of Birmingham hip resurfacing at 12 to 15 years: a single-surgeon series.
Daniel J; Pradhan C; Ziaee H; Pynsent PB; McMinn DJ
Bone Joint J; 2014 Oct; 96-B(10):1298-306. PubMed ID: 25274912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Five to Ten-Year Results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Implant in the U.S.: A Single Institution's Experience.
Ford MC; Hellman MD; Kazarian GS; Clohisy JC; Nunley RM; Barrack RL
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Nov; 100(21):1879-1887. PubMed ID: 30399083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum follow-up of ten years.
Treacy RB; McBryde CW; Shears E; Pynsent PB
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Jan; 93(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 21196539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Birmingham hip resurfacing in patients who are seventy years of age or older.
Carrothers AD; Gilbert RE; Richardson JB
Hip Int; 2011; 21(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 21462151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 10 years: results from an independent centre.
Moroni A; Miscione MT; Orsini R; Micera G; Mosca S; Sinapi F; De Girolamo L; Banfi G
Hip Int; 2017 Mar; 27(2):134-139. PubMed ID: 28362050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a series of 140 consecutive hips with a minimum five year follow-up. A clinical, radiological and histological analysis.
Giannini S; Cadossi M; Chiarello E; Faldini C; Moroni A; Romagnoli M
Hip Int; 2011; 21(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 21279970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Metal ion levels from well-functioning Birmingham Hip Resurfacings decline significantly at ten years.
Van Der Straeten C; Van Quickenborne D; De Roest B; Calistri A; Victor J; De Smet K
Bone Joint J; 2013 Oct; 95-B(10):1332-8. PubMed ID: 24078528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Results of the First U.S. FDA-Approved Hip Resurfacing Device at 10-Year Follow-up.
Su EP; Ho H; Bhal V; Housman LR; Masonis JL; Noble JW; Hopper RH; Engh CA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2021 Jul; 103(14):1303-1311. PubMed ID: 33999875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a series of 110 consecutive hips with a minimum five-year clinical and radiological follow-up.
Heilpern GN; Shah NN; Fordyce MJ
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Sep; 90(9):1137-42. PubMed ID: 18757951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
