These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
374 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21282753)
1. Adverse reaction to metal debris following hip resurfacing: the influence of component type, orientation and volumetric wear. Langton DJ; Joyce TJ; Jameson SS; Lord J; Van Orsouw M; Holland JP; Nargol AV; De Smet KA J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Feb; 93(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 21282753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accelerating failure rate of the ASR total hip replacement. Langton DJ; Jameson SS; Joyce TJ; Gandhi JN; Sidaginamale R; Mereddy P; Lord J; Nargol AV J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Aug; 93(8):1011-6. PubMed ID: 21768621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of explanted Articular Surface Replacement and Birmingham Hip Resurfacing components. Underwood R; Matthies A; Cann P; Skinner JA; Hart AJ J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Sep; 93(9):1169-77. PubMed ID: 21911526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Metal ion release from bearing wear and corrosion with 28 mm and large-diameter metal-on-metal bearing articulations: a follow-up study. Vendittoli PA; Roy A; Mottard S; Girard J; Lusignan D; Lavigne M J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Jan; 92(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 20044673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Exposure to chromium, cobalt and molybdenum from metal-on-metal total hip replacement and hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Witzleb WC; Ziegler J; Krummenauer F; Neumeister V; Guenther KP Acta Orthop; 2006 Oct; 77(5):697-705. PubMed ID: 17068698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of component size and orientation on the concentrations of metal ions after resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. Langton DJ; Jameson SS; Joyce TJ; Webb J; Nargol AV J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Sep; 90(9):1143-51. PubMed ID: 18757952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retrieval analysis of 240 metal-on-metal hip components, comparing modular total hip replacement with hip resurfacing. Matthies A; Underwood R; Cann P; Ilo K; Nawaz Z; Skinner J; Hart AJ J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Mar; 93(3):307-14. PubMed ID: 21357950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Effectiveness of Blood Metal Ions in Identifying Patients with Unilateral Birmingham Hip Resurfacing and Corail-Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants at Risk of Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris. Matharu GS; Berryman F; Brash L; Pynsent PB; Treacy RB; Dunlop DJ J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Apr; 98(8):617-26. PubMed ID: 27098320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Independent predictors of revision following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a retrospective cohort study using National Joint Registry data. Jameson SS; Baker PN; Mason J; Porter ML; Deehan DJ; Reed MR J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jun; 94(6):746-54. PubMed ID: 22628587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The exercise-related rise in plasma cobalt levels after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Khan M; Kuiper JH; Richardson JB J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Sep; 90(9):1152-7. PubMed ID: 18757953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Systemic toxicity related to metal hip prostheses. Bradberry SM; Wilkinson JM; Ferner RE Clin Toxicol (Phila); 2014; 52(8):837-47. PubMed ID: 25132471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Which factors determine the wear rate of large-diameter metal-on-metal hip replacements? Multivariate analysis of two hundred and seventy-six components. Hart AJ; Muirhead-Allwood S; Porter M; Matthies A; Ilo K; Maggiore P; Underwood R; Cann P; Cobb J; Skinner JA J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Apr; 95(8):678-85. PubMed ID: 23595065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vivo wear rate of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty. A review of 10 retrieved components. Witzleb WC; Hanisch U; Ziegler J; Guenther KP J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6):951-6. PubMed ID: 18757168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. One-component revision of failed hip resurfacing from adverse reaction to metal wear debris. Pritchett JW J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jan; 29(1):219-24. PubMed ID: 23680501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Understanding why metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties fail: a comparison between patients with well-functioning and revised birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasties. AAOS exhibit selection. Hart AJ; Matthies A; Henckel J; Ilo K; Skinner J; Noble PC J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Feb; 94(4):e22. PubMed ID: 22336981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Acetabular cup malalignment after total hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a case for elective revision? Mai MC; Milbrandt JC; Hulsen J; Allan DG Orthopedics; 2009 Nov; 32(11):853. PubMed ID: 19902880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Revision of Metal-on-metal Hip Prostheses Results in Marked Reduction of Blood Cobalt and Chromium Ion Concentrations. Lainiala O; Reito A; Elo P; Pajamäki J; Puolakka T; Eskelinen A Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jul; 473(7):2305-13. PubMed ID: 25623595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of bearing wear, whole blood and synovial fluid metal ion concentrations and histopathological findings in patients with failed ASR hip resurfacings. Lehtovirta L; Reito A; Parkkinen J; Hothi H; Henckel J; Hart A; Eskelinen A BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Dec; 18(1):523. PubMed ID: 29228956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lymphocyte proliferation responses in patients with pseudotumors following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Kwon YM; Thomas P; Summer B; Pandit H; Taylor A; Beard D; Murray DW; Gill HS J Orthop Res; 2010 Apr; 28(4):444-50. PubMed ID: 19834954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can blood metal ion levels be used to identify patients with bilateral Birmingham Hip Resurfacings who are at risk of adverse reactions to metal debris? Matharu GS; Berryman F; Brash L; Pynsent PB; Dunlop DJ; Treacy RB Bone Joint J; 2016 Nov; 98-B(11):1455-1462. PubMed ID: 27803220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]