These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21282757)

  • 1. The effect of surface finish and interstitial fluid on the cement-in-cement interface in revision surgery of the hip.
    Rudol G; Wilcox R; Jin Z; Tsiridis E
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Feb; 93(2):188-93. PubMed ID: 21282757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanical aspects of degree of cement bonding and implant wedge effect.
    Yoon YS; Oxland TR; Hodgson AJ; Duncan CP; Masri BA; Choi D
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Nov; 23(9):1141-7. PubMed ID: 18584929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro cyclic testing of the Exeter stem after cement within cement revision.
    Wilson LJ; Bell CG; Weinrauch P; Crawford R
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):789-94. PubMed ID: 18534400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of 2 modern femoral cementing techniques: analysis by cement-bone interface pressure measurements, computerized image analysis, and static mechanical testing.
    Reading AD; McCaskie AW; Barnes MR; Gregg PJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jun; 15(4):479-87. PubMed ID: 10884209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of vacuum mixing and pre-heating the femoral component on the mechanical properties of the cement mantle.
    Baleani M; Bialoblocka-Juszczyk E; Engels GE; Viceconti M
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Mar; 92(3):454-60. PubMed ID: 20190321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty using rough and smooth surface femoral stems with similar design: 10-year survivorship of 48 cases.
    Datir SP; Wynn-Jones CH
    Acta Orthop; 2005 Dec; 76(6):809-14. PubMed ID: 16470434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The significance of the micropores at the stem-cement interface in total hip replacement.
    Zhang H; Blunt L; Jiang X; Brown L; Barrans S
    J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 2011; 22(7):845-56. PubMed ID: 21144164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cement mantle retention: filling the hole.
    Cross M; Bostrom M
    Orthopedics; 2009 Sep; 32(9):. PubMed ID: 19751012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Challenges in relating experimental hip implant fixation predictions to clinical observations.
    Sangiorgio SN; Longjohn DB; Dorr LD; Ebramzadeh E
    J Biomech; 2011 Jan; 44(2):235-43. PubMed ID: 21040920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of femoral stem surface finish on the apparent static shear strength at the stem-cement interface.
    Zhang H; Brown LT; Blunt LA; Barrans SM
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2008 Jan; 1(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 19627775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shear properties of bilaminar polymethylmethacrylate cement mantles in revision hip joint arthroplasty.
    Weinrauch PC; Bell C; Wilson L; Goss B; Lutton C; Crawford RW
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Apr; 22(3):394-403. PubMed ID: 17400096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reaming versus broaching in cemented hip arthroplasty: mechanical stability in cadaver femora.
    Ioannidis TT; Apostolou CD; Korres DS; Papaletsos I; Gandaifis ND; Panagopoulos CN; Agathocleous PE
    Acta Orthop; 2005 Jun; 76(3):326-30. PubMed ID: 16156458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors affecting flexural strength in cement within cement revisions.
    Dang K; Pelletier MH; Walsh WR
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1540-8. PubMed ID: 21414744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of stem insertion rate on the porosity of the cement mantle of hip joint replacements.
    Baleani M; Fognani R; Toni A
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2003; 217(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 12807160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement of transient and residual stresses during polymerization of bone cement for cemented hip implants.
    Nuño N; Madrala A; Plamondon D
    J Biomech; 2008 Aug; 41(12):2605-11. PubMed ID: 18692188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cement-within-cement revision hip arthroplasty; should it be done?
    Li PL; Ingle PJ; Dowell JK
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1996 Sep; 78(5):809-11. PubMed ID: 8836076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of bone density on the cement fixation of femoral hip resurfacing components.
    Bitsch RG; Jäger S; Lürssen M; Loidolt T; Schmalzried TP; Clarius M
    J Orthop Res; 2010 Aug; 28(8):986-91. PubMed ID: 20162694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of impaction on cement mantle and trabecular bone in hip resurfacing.
    Schlegel UJ; Knifka J; Röllinghoff M; Koebke J; Eysel P; Morlock MM
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2011 Apr; 131(4):459-64. PubMed ID: 20632022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of the cementing technique on the cement mantle in hip resurfacing: an in vitro computed tomography scan-based analysis.
    Scheerlinck T; Delport H; Kiewitt T
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Feb; 92(2):375-87. PubMed ID: 20124065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cementing constrained acetabular liners in revision hip replacement: clinical and laboratory observations.
    Mountney J; Garbuz DS; Greidanus NV; Masri BA; Duncan CP
    Instr Course Lect; 2004; 53():131-40. PubMed ID: 15116607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.