These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Estimation of finite population mean for a sensitive variable using dual auxiliary information in the presence of measurement errors. Zahid E; Shabbir J PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0212111. PubMed ID: 30742674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Joint models for a primary endpoint and multiple longitudinal covariate processes. Li E; Wang N; Wang NY Biometrics; 2007 Dec; 63(4):1068-78. PubMed ID: 17501940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ratio estimation with measurement error in the auxiliary variate. Gregoire TG; Salas C Biometrics; 2009 Jun; 65(2):590-8. PubMed ID: 18759838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimation in capture-recapture models when covariates are subject to measurement errors. Hwang WH; Huang SY Biometrics; 2003 Dec; 59(4):1113-22. PubMed ID: 14969492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Density estimation in the presence of heteroscedastic measurement error of unknown type using phase function deconvolution. Nghiem L; Potgieter CJ Stat Med; 2018 Nov; 37(25):3679-3692. PubMed ID: 30003564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Segmented regression with errors in predictors: semi-parametric and parametric methods. Küchenhoff H; Carroll RJ Stat Med; 1997 Jan 15-Feb 15; 16(1-3):169-88. PubMed ID: 9004390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adjustment for missingness using auxiliary information in semiparametric regression. Zeng D; Chen Q Biometrics; 2010 Mar; 66(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 19432773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Type I and Type II error under random-effects misspecification in generalized linear mixed models. Litière S; Alonso A; Molenberghs G Biometrics; 2007 Dec; 63(4):1038-44. PubMed ID: 17425642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robust best linear estimator for Cox regression with instrumental variables in whole cohort and surrogates with additive measurement error in calibration sample. Wang CY; Song X Biom J; 2016 Nov; 58(6):1465-1484. PubMed ID: 27546625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Instrumental variables vs. grouping approach for reducing bias due to measurement error. Batistatou E; McNamee R Int J Biostat; 2008; 4(1):Article 8. PubMed ID: 22462115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Semiparametric estimation in generalized linear mixed models with auxiliary covariates: a pairwise likelihood approach. Liu L; Xiang L Biometrics; 2014 Dec; 70(4):910-9. PubMed ID: 25251282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A non-parametric conditional bivariate reference region with an application to height/weight measurements on normal girls. Petersen JH Biom J; 2009 Aug; 51(4):697-709. PubMed ID: 19650052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A natural robustification of the ordinary instrumental variables estimator. Freue GV; Ortiz-Molina H; Zamar RH Biometrics; 2013 Sep; 69(3):641-50. PubMed ID: 23865476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Monte Carlo methods for nonparametric regression with heteroscedastic measurement error. McIntyre J; Johnson BA; Rappaport SM Biometrics; 2018 Jun; 74(2):498-505. PubMed ID: 28914966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Semiparametric maximum likelihood for measurement error model regression. Schafer DW Biometrics; 2001 Mar; 57(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 11252618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Constrained S-estimators for linear mixed effects models with covariance components. Chervoneva I; Vishnyakov M Stat Med; 2011 Jun; 30(14):1735-50. PubMed ID: 21638300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A note on dichotomization of continuous response variable in the presence of contamination and model misspecification. Shentu Y; Xie M Stat Med; 2010 Sep; 29(21):2200-14. PubMed ID: 20812301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]