These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21284684)

  • 1. Using a familiar risk comparison within a risk ladder to improve risk understanding by low numerates: a study of visual attention.
    Keller C
    Risk Anal; 2011 Jul; 31(7):1043-54. PubMed ID: 21284684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of risk ladder format on risk perception in high- and low-numerate individuals.
    Keller C; Siegrist M; Visschers V
    Risk Anal; 2009 Sep; 29(9):1255-64. PubMed ID: 19572963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does Guiding Toward Task-Relevant Information Help Improve Graph Processing and Graph Comprehension of Individuals with Low or High Numeracy? An Eye-Tracker Experiment.
    Keller C; Junghans A
    Med Decis Making; 2017 Nov; 37(8):942-954. PubMed ID: 28618918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of risk communication formats on risk perception depending on numeracy.
    Keller C; Siegrist M
    Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(4):483-90. PubMed ID: 19525484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High Numerates Count Icons and Low Numerates Process Large Areas in Pictographs: Results of an Eye-Tracking Study.
    Kreuzmair C; Siegrist M; Keller C
    Risk Anal; 2016 Aug; 36(8):1599-614. PubMed ID: 26800006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Presentation format affects comprehension and risk assessment: the case of prenatal screening.
    Miron-Shatz T; Hanoch Y; Graef D; Sagi M
    J Health Commun; 2009; 14(5):439-50. PubMed ID: 19657924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of numeracy on the comprehension of information about medicines in users of a patient information website.
    Gardner PH; McMillan B; Raynor DK; Woolf E; Knapp P
    Patient Educ Couns; 2011 Jun; 83(3):398-403. PubMed ID: 21621949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comprehension of Internet-based numeric cancer information by older adults.
    Donelle L; Hoffman-Goetz L; Gatobu S; Arocha JF
    Inform Health Soc Care; 2009 Dec; 34(4):209-24. PubMed ID: 19919298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using plausible group sizes to communicate information about medical risks.
    Garcia-Retamero R; Galesic M
    Patient Educ Couns; 2011 Aug; 84(2):245-50. PubMed ID: 20728298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Communicating risk information: the influence of graphical display format on quantitative information perception-Accuracy, comprehension and preferences.
    Price M; Cameron R; Butow P
    Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Dec; 69(1-3):121-8. PubMed ID: 17905553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Numeracy and the perception and communication of risk.
    Peters E
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008 Apr; 1128():1-7. PubMed ID: 18469208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Understanding the positive effects of graphical risk information on comprehension: measuring attention directed to written, tabular, and graphical risk information.
    Smerecnik CM; Mesters I; Kessels LT; Ruiter RA; De Vries NK; De Vries H
    Risk Anal; 2010 Sep; 30(9):1387-98. PubMed ID: 20561265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Increased attention but more efficient disengagement: neuroscientific evidence for defensive processing of threatening health information.
    Kessels LT; Ruiter RA; Jansma BM
    Health Psychol; 2010 Jul; 29(4):346-54. PubMed ID: 20658820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving risk literacy in surgeons.
    Garcia-Retamero R; Cokely ET; Wicki B; Joeris A
    Patient Educ Couns; 2016 Jul; 99(7):1156-1161. PubMed ID: 26879804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gaze allocation in a dynamic situation: effects of social status and speaking.
    Foulsham T; Cheng JT; Tracy JL; Henrich J; Kingstone A
    Cognition; 2010 Dec; 117(3):319-31. PubMed ID: 20965502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measuring numeracy without a math test: development of the Subjective Numeracy Scale.
    Fagerlin A; Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Ubel PA; Jankovic A; Derry HA; Smith DM
    Med Decis Making; 2007; 27(5):672-80. PubMed ID: 17641137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlating reading comprehension and health numeracy among adults with low literacy.
    Golbeck A; Paschal A; Jones A; Hsiao T
    Patient Educ Couns; 2011 Jul; 84(1):132-4. PubMed ID: 20598469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does Iconicity in Pictographs Matter? The Influence of Iconicity and Numeracy on Information Processing, Decision Making, and Liking in an Eye-Tracking Study.
    Kreuzmair C; Siegrist M; Keller C
    Risk Anal; 2017 Mar; 37(3):546-556. PubMed ID: 27089046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Eye fixations of deaf and hearing observers in simultaneous communication perception.
    De Filippo CL; Lansing CR
    Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):331-52. PubMed ID: 16825884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.