These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21284692)

  • 1. Methods in pharmacology: measurement of cardiac output.
    Geerts BF; Aarts LP; Jansen JR
    Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2011 Mar; 71(3):316-30. PubMed ID: 21284692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cardiac output measurements. A review of current techniques and research.
    Ehlers KC; Mylrea KC; Waterson CK; Calkins JM
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1986; 14(3):219-39. PubMed ID: 3532871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Estimating cardiac output. Utility in the clinical practice. Available invasive and non-invasive monitoring].
    García X; Mateu L; Maynar J; Mercadal J; Ochagavía A; Ferrandiz A
    Med Intensiva; 2011 Dec; 35(9):552-61. PubMed ID: 21411188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring cardiac output in critically Ill patients: disagreement between thermodilution-, calculated-, expired gas-, and oxygen consumption-based methods.
    Sherman MS; Kosinski R; Paz HL; Campbell D
    Cardiology; 1997; 88(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 8960620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Noninvasive Assessment of Cardiac Output: Accuracy and Precision of the Closed-Circuit Acetylene Rebreathing Technique for Cardiac Output Measurement.
    Hardin EA; Stoller D; Lawley J; Howden EJ; Hieda M; Pawelczyk J; Jarvis S; Prisk K; Sarma S; Levine BD
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2020 Sep; 9(17):e015794. PubMed ID: 32851906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of cardiac output measurement techniques: thermodilution, Doppler, CO2-rebreathing and the direct Fick method.
    Espersen K; Jensen EW; Rosenborg D; Thomsen JK; Eliasen K; Olsen NV; Kanstrup IL
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 1995 Feb; 39(2):245-51. PubMed ID: 7793193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of cardiac output determined by bioimpedance, thermodilution, and the Fick method.
    Engoren M; Barbee D
    Am J Crit Care; 2005 Jan; 14(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 15608107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cardiac output measurement with a simplified thermodilution technique. Comparison with the Fick method.
    Sibille L; Prasquier R; Vallois JM; Gaudebout C; Pocidalo JJ
    Biomedicine; 1975 Feb; 23(2):64-7. PubMed ID: 239762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Measurement of cardiac output by invasive methods: methods and variability].
    Machecourt J; Bertrand B; Polidori C
    Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris); 1992 May; 41(5):237-45. PubMed ID: 1416764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Understanding techniques for measuring cardiac output.
    Taylor BC; Sheffer DB
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 1990; 24(3):188-97. PubMed ID: 2188704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output by a carbon dioxide rebreathing method at rest and during exercise.
    Nugent AM; McParland J; McEneaney DJ; Steele I; Campbell NP; Stanford CF; Nicholls DP
    Eur Heart J; 1994 Mar; 15(3):361-8. PubMed ID: 8013510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Noninvasive versus invasive assessment of cardiac output after cardiac surgery: clinical validation.
    Spahn DR; Schmid ER; Tornic M; Jenni R; von Segesser L; Turina M; Baetscher A
    J Cardiothorac Anesth; 1990 Feb; 4(1):46-59. PubMed ID: 2131856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cardiac output monitoring.
    Mathews L; Singh RK
    Ann Card Anaesth; 2008; 11(1):56-68. PubMed ID: 18182765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of a new method based on ultrasound velocity dilution to measure cardiac output in paediatric patients.
    Floh AA; La Rotta G; Wermelt JZ; Bastero-Miñón P; Sivarajan VB; Humpl T
    Intensive Care Med; 2013 May; 39(5):926-33. PubMed ID: 23430016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of bedside measurement of cardiac output with the thermodilution method and the Fick method in mechanically ventilated patients.
    Gonzalez J; Delafosse C; Fartoukh M; Capderou A; Straus C; Zelter M; Derenne JP; Similowski T
    Crit Care; 2003 Apr; 7(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 12720564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Oxygen Fick and modified carbon dioxide Fick cardiac outputs.
    Mahutte CK; Jaffe MB; Chen PA; Sasse SA; Wong DH; Sassoon CS
    Crit Care Med; 1994 Jan; 22(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 8124981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lack of agreement between thermodilution and fick cardiac output in critically ill patients.
    Dhingra VK; Fenwick JC; Walley KR; Chittock DR; Ronco JJ
    Chest; 2002 Sep; 122(3):990-7. PubMed ID: 12226045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Noninvasive technologies for tissue perfusion.
    Ramsay J
    Anesthesiol Clin; 2006 Dec; 24(4):763-75. PubMed ID: 17342963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determination of cardiac output by ultrasound dilution technique in infants and children: a validation study against direct Fick principle.
    Boehne M; Baustert M; Paetzel V; Köditz H; Schoof S; Happel CM; Bertram H
    Br J Anaesth; 2014 Mar; 112(3):469-76. PubMed ID: 24335550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automated non-invasive measurement of cardiac output by the carbon dioxide rebreathing method: comparisons with dye dilution and thermodilution.
    Russell AE; Smith SA; West MJ; Aylward PE; McRitchie RJ; Hassam RM; Minson RB; Wing LM; Chalmers JP
    Br Heart J; 1990 Mar; 63(3):195-9. PubMed ID: 2109625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.