These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21284730)

  • 1. Population viability analysis with species occurrence data from museum collections.
    Skarpaas O; Stabbetorp OE
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Jun; 25(3):577-86. PubMed ID: 21284730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A statistical approach to quasi-extinction forecasting.
    Holmes EE; Sabo JL; Viscido SV; Fagan WF
    Ecol Lett; 2007 Dec; 10(12):1182-98. PubMed ID: 17803676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensitivity analyses of spatial population viability analysis models for species at risk and habitat conservation planning.
    Naujokaitis-Lewis IR; Curtis JM; Arcese P; Rosenfeld J
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Feb; 23(1):225-9. PubMed ID: 18798856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Actual and potential use of population viability analyses in recovery of plant species listed under the US endangered species act.
    Zeigler SL; Che-Castaldo JP; Neel MC
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1265-78. PubMed ID: 24033732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predictive accuracy of population viability analysis in conservation biology.
    Brook BW; O'Grady JJ; Chapman AP; Burgman MA; Akçakaya HR; Frankham R
    Nature; 2000 Mar; 404(6776):385-7. PubMed ID: 10746724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A behaviorally explicit demographic model integrating habitat selection and population dynamics in california sea lions.
    González-Suárez M; Gerber LR
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Dec; 22(6):1608-18. PubMed ID: 18680502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rates of movement of threatened bird species between IUCN red list categories and toward extinction.
    Brooke Mde L; Butchart SH; Garnett ST; Crowley GM; Mantilla-Beniers NB; Stattersfield AJ
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Apr; 22(2):417-27. PubMed ID: 18402584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Commentary on Holmes et al. (2007): resolving the debate on when extinction risk is predictable.
    Ellner SP; Holmes EE
    Ecol Lett; 2008 Aug; 11(8):E1-5. PubMed ID: 18638300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A framework for developing objective and measurable recovery criteria for threatened and endangered species.
    Himes Boor GK
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Feb; 28(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 24112040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determining optimal population monitoring for rare butterflies.
    Haddad NM; Hudgens B; Damiani C; Gross K; Kuefler D; Pollock K
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Aug; 22(4):929-40. PubMed ID: 18477025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A review of the relationships between human population density and biodiversity.
    Luck GW
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2007 Nov; 82(4):607-45. PubMed ID: 17944620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A protocol for better design, application, and communication of population viability analyses.
    Pe'er G; Matsinos YG; Johst K; Franz KW; Turlure C; Radchuk V; Malinowska AH; Curtis JM; Naujokaitis-Lewis I; Wintle BA; Henle K
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):644-56. PubMed ID: 23692056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modeling observation error and its effects in a random walk/extinction model.
    Buonaccorsi JP; Staudenmayer J; Carreras M
    Theor Popul Biol; 2006 Nov; 70(3):322-35. PubMed ID: 16580037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inferring national and regional declines of rare orchid species with probabilistic models.
    Duffy KJ; Kingston NE; Sayers BA; Roberts DL; Stout JC
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Feb; 23(1):184-95. PubMed ID: 18798858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of a threatened-species focus on conservation planning.
    Drummond SP; Wilson KA; Meijaard E; Watts M; Dennis R; Christy L; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):441-9. PubMed ID: 19843123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Geography and recovery under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
    Carroll C; Vucetich JA; Nelson MP; Rohlf DJ; Phillips MK
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 20151988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A critical appraisal of population viability analysis.
    Chaudhary V; Oli MK
    Conserv Biol; 2020 Feb; 34(1):26-40. PubMed ID: 31435956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The sensitivity of population viability analysis to uncertainty about habitat requirements: implications for the management of the endangered southern brown bandicoot.
    Southwell DM; Lechner AM; Coates T; Wintle BA
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Aug; 22(4):1045-54. PubMed ID: 18477023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Regional decline of an iconic amphibian associated with elevation, land-use change, and invasive species.
    Johnson PT; McKenzie VJ; Peterson AC; Kerby JL; Brown J; Blaustein AR; Jackson T
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Jun; 25(3):556-66. PubMed ID: 21342266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Threatened species and the potential loss of phylogenetic diversity: conservation scenarios based on estimated extinction probabilities and phylogenetic risk analysis.
    Faith DP
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Dec; 22(6):1461-70. PubMed ID: 18798854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.