200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21285878)
1. Determination of preferred parameters for multichannel compression using individually fitted simulated hearing AIDS and paired comparisons.
Moore BC; Füllgrabe C; Stone MA
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):556-68. PubMed ID: 21285878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the CAM2 and NAL-NL2 hearing aid fitting methods.
Moore BC; Sęk A
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 22878351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the CAMEQ2-HF method for fitting hearing aids with multichannel amplitude compression.
Moore BC; Füllgrabe C
Ear Hear; 2010 Oct; 31(5):657-66. PubMed ID: 20526199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of Modified Hearing Aid Fittings on Loudness and Tone Quality for Different Acoustic Scenes.
Moore BC; Baer T; Ives DT; Marriage J; Salorio-Corbetto M
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):483-91. PubMed ID: 26928003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An initial-fit comparison of two generic hearing aid prescriptive methods (NAL-NL2 and CAM2) to individuals having mild to moderately severe high-frequency hearing loss.
Johnson EE
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Feb; 24(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 23357807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of bandwidth, compression speed, and gain at high frequencies on preferences for amplified music.
Moore BC
Trends Amplif; 2012 Sep; 16(3):159-72. PubMed ID: 23172008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of multi-channel compression time constants on subjectively perceived sound quality and speech intelligibility.
Hansen M
Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):369-80. PubMed ID: 12195179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of gain for adults from generic hearing aid prescriptive methods: impacts on predicted loudness, frequency bandwidth, and speech intelligibility.
Johnson EE; Dillon H
J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):441-59. PubMed ID: 21993050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Musician and Nonmusician Hearing Aid Setting Preferences for Music and Speech Stimuli.
D'Onofrio KL; Gifford RH; Ricketts TA
Am J Audiol; 2019 Jun; 28(2):333-347. PubMed ID: 31091118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the CAM2A and NAL-NL2 hearing-aid fitting methods for participants with a wide range of hearing losses.
Moore BC; Sęk A
Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 26470732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Music preferences with hearing aids: effects of signal properties, compression settings, and listener characteristics.
Croghan NB; Arehart KH; Kates JM
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(5):e170-84. PubMed ID: 25010635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech intelligibility benefits of hearing AIDS at various input levels.
Kuk F; Lau CC; Korhonen P; Crose B
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):275-88. PubMed ID: 25751695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Paired comparisons of nonlinear frequency compression, extended bandwidth, and restricted bandwidth hearing aid processing for children and adults with hearing loss.
Brennan MA; McCreery R; Kopun J; Hoover B; Alexander J; Lewis D; Stelmachowicz PG
J Am Acad Audiol; 2014; 25(10):983-98. PubMed ID: 25514451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of different forms of compression using wearable digital hearing aids.
Stone MA; Moore BC; Alcántara JI; Glasberg BR
J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Dec; 106(6):3603-19. PubMed ID: 10615700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preliminary evaluation of a method for fitting hearing aids with extended bandwidth.
Füllgrabe C; Baer T; Stone MA; Moore BC
Int J Audiol; 2010 Oct; 49(10):741-53. PubMed ID: 20672875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preferred listening levels for linear and slow-acting compression hearing aids.
Neuman AC; Bakke MH; Hellman S; Levitt H
Ear Hear; 1995 Aug; 16(4):407-16. PubMed ID: 8549896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of fast-acting high-frequency compression on the intelligibility of speech in steady and fluctuating background sounds.
Stone MA; Moore BC; Wojtczak M; Gudgin E
Br J Audiol; 1997 Aug; 31(4):257-73. PubMed ID: 9307821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preferred Compression Speed for Speech and Music and Its Relationship to Sensitivity to Temporal Fine Structure.
Moore BC; Sęk A
Trends Hear; 2016 Sep; 20():. PubMed ID: 27604778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect on speech intelligibility of varying compression time constants in a digital hearing aid.
Moore BC; Stainsby TH; Alcántara JI; Kühnel V
Int J Audiol; 2004; 43(7):399-409. PubMed ID: 15515639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
