These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21285878)

  • 21. Compression-dependent differences in hearing aid gain between speech and nonspeech input signals.
    Henning RW; Bentler R
    Ear Hear; 2005 Aug; 26(4):409-22. PubMed ID: 16079635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Benefits of linear amplification and multichannel compression for speech comprehension in backgrounds with spectral and temporal dips.
    Moore BC; Peters RW; Stone MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jan; 105(1):400-11. PubMed ID: 9921666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss and personal hearing AIDS on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
    Korczak PA; Kurtzberg D; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):165-85. PubMed ID: 15809543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Achieved Gain and Subjective Outcomes for a Wide-Bandwidth Contact Hearing Aid Fitted Using CAM2.
    Arbogast TL; Moore BCJ; Puria S; Dundas D; Brimacombe J; Edwards B; Carr Levy S
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):741-756. PubMed ID: 30300158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses as an Objective Aided Outcome Measure: Effect of Stimulus Level, Bandwidth, and Amplification in Adults With Hearing Loss.
    Easwar V; Purcell DW; Aiken SJ; Parsa V; Scollie SD
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):635-52. PubMed ID: 26226606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. I. Experienced users, fitted bilaterally.
    Moore BC; Alcántara JI; Marriage J
    Br J Audiol; 2001 Dec; 35(6):339-53. PubMed ID: 11848176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Perceived Sound Quality Dimensions Influencing Frequency-Gain Shaping Preferences for Hearing Aid-Amplified Speech and Music.
    Vaisberg JM; Beaulac S; Glista D; Macpherson EA; Scollie SD
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():2331216521989900. PubMed ID: 33563136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The preferred number of channels (one, two, or four) in NAL-NL1 prescribed wide dynamic range compression (WDRC) devices.
    Keidser G; Grant F
    Ear Hear; 2001 Dec; 22(6):516-27. PubMed ID: 11770673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of a transient noise reduction algorithm on speech understanding, subjective preference, and preferred gain.
    Korhonen P; Kuk F; Lau C; Keenan D; Schumacher J; Nielsen J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):845-58. PubMed ID: 24224991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Dual Variable Speed Compressor over a Single Fixed Speed Compressor.
    Kuk F; Slugocki C; Korhonen P; Seper E; Hau O
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019; 30(7):590-606. PubMed ID: 30420004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of audibility and multichannel wide dynamic range compression on consonant recognition for listeners with severe hearing loss.
    Davies-Venn E; Souza P; Brennan M; Stecker GC
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):494-504. PubMed ID: 19633563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Client preferences for compression threshold in single-channel wide dynamic range compression hearing aids.
    Barker C; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 1999 Apr; 20(2):127-39. PubMed ID: 10229514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of frequency compression and frequency transposition on fricative and affricate perception in listeners with normal hearing and mild to moderate hearing loss.
    Alexander JM; Kopun JG; Stelmachowicz PG
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(5):519-32. PubMed ID: 24699702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of performance with wide dynamic range compression and linear amplification.
    Kam AC; Wong LL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1999 Sep; 10(8):445-57. PubMed ID: 10813645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of spatial separation, extended bandwidth, and compression speed on intelligibility in a competing-speech task.
    Moore BC; Füllgrabe C; Stone MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):360-71. PubMed ID: 20649230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cortical auditory-evoked potentials (CAEPs) in adults in response to filtered speech stimuli.
    Carter L; Dillon H; Seymour J; Seeto M; Van Dun B
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):807-22. PubMed ID: 24224988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. High-frequency amplification and sound quality in listeners with normal through moderate hearing loss.
    Ricketts TA; Dittberner AB; Johnson EE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Feb; 51(1):160-72. PubMed ID: 18230863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of a dual-channel full dynamic range compression system for people with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Moore BC; Johnson JS; Clark TM; Pluvinage V
    Ear Hear; 1992 Oct; 13(5):349-70. PubMed ID: 1487095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Matching Automatic Gain Control Across Devices in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
    Veugen LC; Chalupper J; Snik AF; Opstal AJ; Mens LH
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):260-70. PubMed ID: 26656192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. IV. Fitting hearing aids with multi-channel compression so as to restore 'normal' loudness for speech at different levels.
    Moore BC
    Br J Audiol; 2000 Jun; 34(3):165-77. PubMed ID: 10905450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.