BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21286953)

  • 1. Short-term retention of pictures and words as a function of type of distraction and length of delay interval.
    Pellegrino JW; Siegel AW; Dhawan M
    Mem Cognit; 1976 Jan; 4(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 21286953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differential distraction effects in short-term and long-term retention of pictures and words.
    Pellegrino JW; Siegel AW; Dhawan M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1976 Sep; 2(5):541-7. PubMed ID: 1003127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Short-term retention of pictures and words: evidence for dual coding systems.
    Pellegrino JW; Siegel AW; Dhawan M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1975 Mar; 104(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 1141833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acoustic and semantic interference effects in words and pictures.
    Dhawan M; Pellegrino JW
    Mem Cognit; 1977 May; 5(3):340-6. PubMed ID: 24202905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modality effects in short term recognition memory.
    Elliott ML; Geiselman RE; Thomas DJ
    Am J Psychol; 1981 Mar; 94(1):85-98. PubMed ID: 7235084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of recall-concurrent visual-motor distraction on picture and word recall.
    Warren MW
    Mem Cognit; 1977 May; 5(3):362-70. PubMed ID: 24202908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tracing the time course of picture--word processing.
    Smith MC; Magee LE
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1980 Dec; 109(4):373-92. PubMed ID: 6449530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The picture superiority effect in a cross-modality recognition task.
    Stenbert G; Radeborg K; Hedman LR
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Jul; 23(4):425-41. PubMed ID: 7666756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interference in short-term memory from vocalization: aural versus visual modality differences.
    Elliott LA; Strawhorn RJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1976 Nov; 2(6):705-11. PubMed ID: 1010993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Task choice and semantic interference in picture naming.
    Piai V; Roelofs A; Schriefers H
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 May; 157():13-22. PubMed ID: 25703606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implicit and Explicit Attention to Pictures and Words: An fMRI-Study of Concurrent Emotional Stimulus Processing.
    Flaisch T; Imhof M; Schmälzle R; Wentz KU; Ibach B; Schupp HT
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1861. PubMed ID: 26733895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A dual contribution to the involuntary semantic processing of unexpected spoken words.
    Parmentier FB; Turner J; Perez L
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Feb; 143(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 23339333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nonvisual codes and nonvisual brain areas support visual working memory.
    Postle BR; Hamidi M
    Cereb Cortex; 2007 Sep; 17(9):2151-62. PubMed ID: 17150984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Semantic interference in picture naming during dual-task performance does not vary with reading ability.
    Piai V; Roelofs A; Roete I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(9):1758-68. PubMed ID: 25397667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Negative and nonemotional interference with visual working memory in schizophrenia.
    Anticevic A; Repovs G; Corlett PR; Barch DM
    Biol Psychiatry; 2011 Dec; 70(12):1159-68. PubMed ID: 21861986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acoustic interference in a recognition task.
    Lutz J; Wuensch KL
    J Gen Psychol; 1989 Oct; 116(4):371-84. PubMed ID: 2592957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Brain Activity and Network Interactions Linked to Valence-Related Differences in the Impact of Emotional Distraction.
    Iordan AD; Dolcos F
    Cereb Cortex; 2017 Jan; 27(1):731-749. PubMed ID: 26543041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Word position affects stimulus recognition: evidence for early ERP short-term plastic modulation.
    Spironelli C; Galfano G; Umiltà C; Angrilli A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Dec; 82(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 21924299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Semantic interference is not modality specific: Evidence from sound naming with distractor pictures.
    Wöhner S; Jescheniak JD; Mädebach A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Dec; 73(12):2290-2308. PubMed ID: 32640868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cross-modal distraction by deviance: functional similarities between the auditory and tactile modalities.
    Ljungberg JK; Parmentier FB
    Exp Psychol; 2012; 59(6):355-63. PubMed ID: 22750743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.