These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21286974)

  • 1. Differences in encoding for free recall vs. recognition.
    Hall JW; Grossman LR; Elwood KD
    Mem Cognit; 1976 Sep; 4(5):507-13. PubMed ID: 21286974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The roles of encoding strategies and retrieval practice in test-expectancy effects.
    Cho KW; Neely JH
    Memory; 2017 May; 25(5):626-635. PubMed ID: 27348692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are test-expectancy effects better explained by changes in encoding strategies or differential test experience?
    Rivers ML; Dunlosky J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Feb; 47(2):195-207. PubMed ID: 32940510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Test expectancy and memory for important information.
    Middlebrooks CD; Murayama K; Castel AD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jun; 43(6):972-985. PubMed ID: 28095010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hypermnesia occurs in recall but not in recognition.
    Payne DG; Roediger HL
    Am J Psychol; 1987; 100(2):145-65. PubMed ID: 3618837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating the contributions of task expectancy in the testing and guessing benefits on recognition memory.
    Huff MJ; Yates TJ; Balota DA
    Memory; 2018 Sep; 26(8):1065-1083. PubMed ID: 29723114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distinctiveness and priority in free recall of words.
    Schmidt CR; Schmidt SR; Wilson KA
    Memory; 2021 Jan; 29(1):21-38. PubMed ID: 33158367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of retrieval during study: Evidence of reminding from self-paced study time.
    McKinley GL; Ross BH; Benjamin AS
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Jul; 47(5):877-892. PubMed ID: 30725375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Examining the relationship between free recall and immediate serial recall: the serial nature of recall and the effect of test expectancy.
    Bhatarah P; Ward G; Tan L
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Jan; 36(1):20-34. PubMed ID: 18323059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Why do participants initiate free recall of short lists of words with the first list item? Toward a general episodic memory explanation.
    Spurgeon J; Ward G; Matthews WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Nov; 40(6):1551-67. PubMed ID: 24933695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Deficits in memory retrieval: an argument in favor of frontal subcortical dysfunction in depression].
    Fossati P; Deweer B; Raoux N; Allilaire JF
    Encephale; 1995; 21(4):295-305. PubMed ID: 7588169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modality effects in delayed free recall and recognition: visual is better than auditory.
    Penney CG
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1989 Aug; 41(3):455-70. PubMed ID: 2798920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Effects of test-expectancies and test-sequence orders on the recognition failure of recallable words].
    Maezawa K; Kashu K
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1988 Oct; 59(4):234-40. PubMed ID: 3236585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Memorability as a measure of processing: a unit analysis of prose and list learning.
    Rubin DC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1985 Jun; 114(2):213-38. PubMed ID: 3159830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Age differences in adults' scene memory: knowledge and strategy interactions.
    Azmitia M; Perlmutter M
    Compr Gerontol B; 1988 Aug; 2(2):75-84. PubMed ID: 3228800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using recall to reduce false recognition: diagnostic and disqualifying monitoring.
    Gallo DA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jan; 30(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 14736301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. RBANS analysis of verbal memory in multiple sclerosis.
    Beatty WW
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2004 Sep; 19(6):825-34. PubMed ID: 15288335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are There Age Differences in Consolidated Episodic Memory?
    Allen PA; Hughes ML; Houston JR; Jardin E; Mallik P; McLennan C; Delahanty DL
    Exp Aging Res; 2019; 45(2):97-119. PubMed ID: 30849026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Free recall test experience potentiates strategy-driven effects of value on memory.
    Cohen MS; Rissman J; Hovhannisyan M; Castel AD; Knowlton BJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1581-1601. PubMed ID: 28394160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. No selective deficit in recall in amnesia.
    MacAndrew SB; Jones GV; Mayes AR
    Memory; 1994 Sep; 2(3):241-54. PubMed ID: 7584294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.