These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21287047)
1. Duaal processes in recognition and in recognition failure. Richard Hanley J Mem Cognit; 1984 Nov; 12(6):575-80. PubMed ID: 21287047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exceptions to recognition failure as a function of the encoded association between cue and target. Bryant DJ Mem Cognit; 1991 Mar; 19(2):210-9. PubMed ID: 2017044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of integration in recognition failure and action memory. Kormi-Nouri R; Nilsson LG Mem Cognit; 1998 Jul; 26(4):681-91. PubMed ID: 9701961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Item-specific effects in recognition failure: reasons for rejection of the Tulving-Wiseman function. Lian A; Glass AL; Raanaas RK Mem Cognit; 1998 Jul; 26(4):692-707. PubMed ID: 9701962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Tulving-Wiseman law and the recognition of recallable music. Gardiner JM; Kaminska Z; Java RI; Clarke EF; Mayer P Mem Cognit; 1990 Nov; 18(6):632-7. PubMed ID: 2266864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A multinomial modeling analysis of the recognition-failure paradigm. Riefer DM; Batchelder WH Mem Cognit; 1995 Sep; 23(5):611-30. PubMed ID: 7476247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recognition failure of categorised words: further evidence of exceptions. Gardiner JM; Mäntylä T; Nilsson LG Memory; 1995 Mar; 3(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 8556534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The use of cue familiarity during retrieval failure is affected by past versus future orientation. Cleary AM Memory; 2015; 23(4):590-601. PubMed ID: 24786966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recognition during recall failure: Semantic feature matching as a mechanism for recognition of semantic cues when recall fails. Cleary AM; Ryals AJ; Wagner SR Mem Cognit; 2016 Jan; 44(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 26282623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retrieval dynamics in recognition and list discrimination: further evidence of separate processes of familiarity and recall. Hintzman DL; Caulton DA; Levitin DJ Mem Cognit; 1998 May; 26(3):449-62. PubMed ID: 9610117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Remembering and knowing in a patient with preserved recognition and impaired recall. Hanley JR; Davies AD; Downes JJ; Roberts JN; Gong QY; Mayes AR Neuropsychologia; 2001; 39(9):1003-10. PubMed ID: 11516451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of cue-target uniqueness on cued recall performance. Stein B Mem Cognit; 1977 May; 5(3):319-22. PubMed ID: 24202901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. More ways than one: ERPs reveal multiple familiarity signals in the word frequency mirror effect. Bridger EK; Bader R; Mecklinger A Neuropsychologia; 2014 May; 57():179-90. PubMed ID: 24675676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Part-List Cues Hinder Familiarity but Not Recollection in Item Recognition: Behavioral and Event-Related Potential Evidence. Liu T; Xing M; Bai X Front Psychol; 2020; 11():561899. PubMed ID: 33132967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A role for familiarity in supporting the testing effect over time. Shaffer RA; McDermott KB Neuropsychologia; 2020 Feb; 138():107298. PubMed ID: 31838098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Episodic generation can cause semantic forgetting: retrieval-induced forgetting of false memories. Starns JJ; Hicks JL Mem Cognit; 2004 Jun; 32(4):602-9. PubMed ID: 15478754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mathematical constraints and the Tulving-Wiseman law: a rejoinder. Gardiner JM; Nilsson LG Memory; 1993 Sep; 1(3):219-29. PubMed ID: 7584269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]