These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21288060)

  • 21. Audibility-index predictions of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' performance on the connected speech test.
    Sherbecoe RL; Studebaker GA
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 12598814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment of auditory processing disorder in children using an adaptive filtered speech test.
    Rickard NA; Heidtke UJ; O'Beirne GA
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Oct; 52(10):687-97. PubMed ID: 23879742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reference sound pressure level for Korean speech audiometry.
    Han H; Lee J; Cho S; Kim J; Lee K; Choi WD
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 21047297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Two-tone auditory suppression in younger and older normal-hearing adults and its relationship to speech perception in noise.
    Sommers MS; Gehr SE
    Hear Res; 2010 Jun; 264(1-2):56-62. PubMed ID: 20006694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Contribution of high-frequency information to the acceptance of background noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Plyler PN; Madix SG; Thelin JW; Johnston KW
    Am J Audiol; 2007 Dec; 16(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 18056883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Benefits of audibility for listeners with severe high-frequency hearing loss.
    Simpson A; McDermott HJ; Dowell RC
    Hear Res; 2005 Dec; 210(1-2):42-52. PubMed ID: 16137848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Development of the Mandarin early speech perception test: children with normal hearing and the effects of dialect exposure.
    Zheng Y; Meng ZL; Wang K; Tao Y; Xu K; Soli SD
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):600-12. PubMed ID: 19726935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of envelope enhancement on speech perception in individuals with auditory neuropathy.
    Narne VK; Vanaja CS
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 18091107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Auditory processing in individuals with auditory neuropathy.
    Kumar AU; Jayaram M
    Behav Brain Funct; 2005 Dec; 1():21. PubMed ID: 16321163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf.
    Faulkner A; Walliker JR; Howard IS; Ball V; Fourcin AJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effects of feedback filtering on nasalization in normal and hypernasal speakers.
    Garber SR; Moller KT
    J Speech Hear Res; 1979 Jun; 22(2):321-33. PubMed ID: 491559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Regulation of vocal intensity in the presence of feedback filtering and amplification.
    Garber SR; Siegel GM; Pick HL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1981 Mar; 24(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 7253615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of feedback filtering on nasalization and self-perception of nasality.
    Burzynski CM; Starr CD
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Dec; 28(4):585-8. PubMed ID: 4087893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of Compression Ratio on Perception of Time Compressed Phonemically Balanced Words in Kannada and Monosyllables.
    Prabhu P; Sujan MJ; Rakshith S
    Audiol Res; 2015 Jan; 5(1):128. PubMed ID: 26557363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Filtered word testing in the assessment of children's central auditory abilities.
    Farrer SM; Keith RW
    Ear Hear; 1981; 2(6):267-9. PubMed ID: 7308601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Speech identification with temporal and spectral modification in subjects with auditory neuropathy.
    Kumar Name V; Vanaja CS
    ISRN Otolaryngol; 2012; 2012():671247. PubMed ID: 23762615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.