These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21288259)

  • 1. Developmental differences in the use of task goals in a cued version of the stroop task.
    Lorsbach TC; Reimer JF
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2011 Mar; 29(Pt 1):138-47. PubMed ID: 21288259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ignoring irrelevant stimuli in latent inhibition and Stroop paradigms: the effects of schizotypy and gender.
    Kaplan O; Lubow RE
    Psychiatry Res; 2011 Mar; 186(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 20797796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Active inhibition of a distractor word: the distractor precue benefit in the Stroop color-naming task.
    Chao HF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Jun; 37(3):799-812. PubMed ID: 21480743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Stroop revisited: a meta-analysis of interference control in AD/HD.
    van Mourik R; Oosterlaan J; Sergeant JA
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2005 Feb; 46(2):150-65. PubMed ID: 15679524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cognitive control in children: stroop interference and suppression of word reading.
    Bub DN; Masson ME; Lalonde CE
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Apr; 17(4):351-7. PubMed ID: 16623694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: how intact is the ipsilesional field?
    Snow JC; Mattingley JB
    Brain; 2006 Jan; 129(Pt 1):168-81. PubMed ID: 16317021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Age-related trends of interference control in school-age children and young adults in the Stroop color-word test.
    Ikeda Y; Okuzumi H; Kokubun M; Haishi K
    Psychol Rep; 2011 Apr; 108(2):577-84. PubMed ID: 21675571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Color-word interference in relation to comparative compatibility: evidence for two sources of interference].
    Schulz T; Liebing D
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1991; 38(4):648-68. PubMed ID: 1785215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mixed pro and antisaccade performance in children and adults.
    Irving EL; Tajik-Parvinchi DJ; Lillakas L; González EG; Steinbach MJ
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1255():67-74. PubMed ID: 19103183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporal constraints of the word blindness posthypnotic suggestion on Stroop task performance.
    Parris BA; Dienes Z; Hodgson TL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Aug; 38(4):833-7. PubMed ID: 22506782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attention and facilitation: converging information versus inadvertent reading in Stroop task performance.
    Roelofs A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):411-22. PubMed ID: 20192539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Deficient inhibition of return for emotional faces in depression.
    Dai Q; Feng Z
    Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry; 2009 Aug; 33(6):921-32. PubMed ID: 19394388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adult age differences in the Color Stroop Test: a comparison between an Item-by-item and a Blocked version.
    Ludwig C; Borella E; Tettamanti M; de Ribaupierre A
    Arch Gerontol Geriatr; 2010; 51(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 19846224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ADHD and Stroop interference from age 9 to age 41 years: a meta-analysis of developmental effects.
    Schwartz K; Verhaeghen P
    Psychol Med; 2008 Nov; 38(11):1607-16. PubMed ID: 18226285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Oddball and incongruity effects during Stroop task performance: a comparative fMRI study on selective attention.
    Melcher T; Gruber O
    Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 1121(1):136-49. PubMed ID: 17022954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enduring cognitive dysfunction in unipolar major depression: a test-retest study using the Stroop paradigm.
    Hammar A; Sørensen L; Ardal G; Oedegaard KJ; Kroken R; Roness A; Lund A
    Scand J Psychol; 2010 Aug; 51(4):304-8. PubMed ID: 20042028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experimental evidence for interpretive but not attention biases towards somatic information in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome.
    Moss-Morris R; Petrie KJ
    Br J Health Psychol; 2003 May; 8(Pt 2):195-208. PubMed ID: 12804333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attention, temporal predictability, and the time course of context effects in naming performance.
    Roelofs A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Feb; 133(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 19963201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 'Goals' are not an integral component of imitation.
    Leighton J; Bird G; Heyes C
    Cognition; 2010 Mar; 114(3):423-35. PubMed ID: 19945096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors influencing Stroop performance in schizophrenia.
    Barch DM; Carter CS; Cohen JD
    Neuropsychology; 2004 Jul; 18(3):477-84. PubMed ID: 15291726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.