These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21288259)

  • 21. Impact of top-down control during mental fatigue.
    Lorist MM
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1232():113-23. PubMed ID: 18687317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Changes in reaction potentials in neurotic depression].
    Munz D; Ehlers W; Czogalik D
    EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb; 1984 Jun; 15(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 6432515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Removing irrelevant information from working memory: a cognitive aging study with the modified Sternberg task.
    Oberauer K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Jul; 27(4):948-57. PubMed ID: 11486928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. About the unidirectionality of interference: insight from the musical Stroop effect.
    Grégoire L; Perruchet P; Poulin-Charronnat B
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(11):2071-89. PubMed ID: 24697690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. ERPs dissociate the effects of switching task sets and task cues.
    Nicholson R; Karayanidis F; Bumak E; Poboka D; Michie PT
    Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1095(1):107-23. PubMed ID: 16714004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Spatial attention modulates feature crosstalk in visual word processing.
    Risko EF; Stolz JA; Besner D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):989-98. PubMed ID: 20436195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Functional connectivity during Stroop task performance.
    Harrison BJ; Shaw M; Yücel M; Purcell R; Brewer WJ; Strother SC; Egan GF; Olver JS; Nathan PJ; Pantelis C
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jan; 24(1):181-91. PubMed ID: 15588609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. How task representations guide attention: further evidence for the shielding function of task sets.
    Dreisbach G; Haider H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):477-86. PubMed ID: 19271860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An electrophysiological study of response conflict processing across the lifespan: assessing the roles of conflict monitoring, cue utilization, response anticipation, and response suppression.
    Hämmerer D; Li SC; Müller V; Lindenberger U
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Sep; 48(11):3305-16. PubMed ID: 20638396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Autonomic predictors of Stroop performance in young and middle-aged adults.
    Mathewson KJ; Jetha MK; Drmic IE; Bryson SE; Goldberg JO; Hall GB; Santesso DL; Segalowitz SJ; Schmidt LA
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Jun; 76(3):123-9. PubMed ID: 20193717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Modulation of word-reading processes in task switching.
    Masson ME; Bub DN; Woodward TS; Chan JC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2003 Sep; 132(3):400-18. PubMed ID: 13678375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. On the minimization of task switch costs following long-term training.
    Berryhill ME; Hughes HC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):503-14. PubMed ID: 19304641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Do children profit from looking beyond looks? From similarity-based to cue abstraction processes in multiple-cue judgment.
    von Helversen B; Mata R; Olsson H
    Dev Psychol; 2010 Jan; 46(1):220-9. PubMed ID: 20053019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Use of the Hayling task to measure inhibition of prepotent responses in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease.
    Belleville S; Rouleau N; Van der Linden M
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Nov; 62(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 16757076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Age differences in attentional control: an event-related potential approach.
    Kray J; Eppinger B; Mecklinger A
    Psychophysiology; 2005 Jul; 42(4):407-16. PubMed ID: 16008769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Conflict: run! Reduced Stroop interference with avoidance responses.
    Schouppe N; De Houwer J; Ridderinkhof KR; Notebaert W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(6):1052-8. PubMed ID: 22640724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The next trial will be conflicting! Effects of explicit congruency pre-cues on cognitive control.
    Bugg JM; Smallwood A
    Psychol Res; 2016 Jan; 80(1):16-33. PubMed ID: 25522873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Using Brain Potentials to Functionally Localise Stroop-Like Effects in Colour and Picture Naming: Perceptual Encoding versus Word Planning.
    Shitova N; Roelofs A; Schriefers H; Bastiaansen M; Schoffelen JM
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0161052. PubMed ID: 27632171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The impact of verbal instructions on goal-directed behaviour.
    Kirkham AJ; Breeze JM; Marí-Beffa P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Jan; 139(1):212-9. PubMed ID: 22035945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The impact of goal cues on everyday action performance in dementia.
    Brennan L; Giovannetti T; Libon DJ; Bettcher BM; Duey K
    Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2009 Aug; 19(4):562-82. PubMed ID: 18923960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.