374 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21288518)
1. Capsule endoscopy versus positron emission tomography for detection of small-bowel metastatic melanoma: a pilot study.
Prakoso E; Fulham M; Thompson JF; Selby WS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Apr; 73(4):750-6. PubMed ID: 21288518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Small bowel metastases from melanoma: does videocapsule provide additional information after FDG positron emission tomography?
Aerts MA; Mana F; Neyns B; De Looze D; Reenaers C; Urbain D
Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2012 Jun; 75(2):219-21. PubMed ID: 22870786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of FDG-PET in the assessment of survival prognosis in melanoma.
Pleiss C; Risse JH; Biersack HJ; Bender H
Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2007 Dec; 22(6):740-7. PubMed ID: 18158764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Capsule endoscopy in patients with malignant melanoma.
Prakoso E; Selby WS
Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Jun; 102(6):1204-8. PubMed ID: 17324125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. High-risk melanoma: accuracy of FDG PET/CT with added CT morphologic information for detection of metastases.
Strobel K; Dummer R; Husarik DB; Pérez Lago M; Hany TF; Steinert HC
Radiology; 2007 Aug; 244(2):566-74. PubMed ID: 17641374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Small bowel invagination caused by intestinal melanoma metastasis: unsuspected diagnosis by FDG-PET/CT imaging.
Strobel K; Skalsky J; Hany TF; Dummer R; Steinert HC
Clin Nucl Med; 2007 Mar; 32(3):213-4. PubMed ID: 17314600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of metastases in patients with cutaneous melanoma using FDG-PET/CT.
Akcali C; Zincirkeser S; Erbagcý Z; Akcali A; Halac M; Durak G; Sager S; Sahin E
J Int Med Res; 2007; 35(4):547-53. PubMed ID: 17697533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Diagnosis of intestinal metastases from malignant melanoma].
Albert JG; Helmbold P
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2012 Mar; 137(9):431-6. PubMed ID: 22354799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography fails to detect distant metastases at initial staging of melanoma patients with metastatic involvement of sentinel lymph node.
Wagner T; Meyer N; Zerdoud S; Julian A; Chevreau C; Payoux P; Courbon F
Br J Dermatol; 2011 Jun; 164(6):1235-40. PubMed ID: 21332457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inefficacy of F-18 fluorodeoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography scans for initial evaluation in early-stage cutaneous melanoma.
Wagner JD; Schauwecker D; Davidson D; Logan T; Coleman JJ; Hutchins G; Love C; Wenck S; Daggy J
Cancer; 2005 Aug; 104(3):570-9. PubMed ID: 15977211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Verification of musculoskeletal FDG-PET-CT findings performed for melanoma staging.
Mansour AA; Kelley MC; Hatmaker AR; Holt GE; Schwartz HS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Apr; 17(4):1144-51. PubMed ID: 19967460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective comparison of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography in patients with melanoma with palpable lymph node metastases: diagnostic accuracy and impact on treatment.
Bastiaannet E; Wobbes T; Hoekstra OS; van der Jagt EJ; Brouwers AH; Koelemij R; de Klerk JM; Oyen WJ; Meijer S; Hoekstra HJ
J Clin Oncol; 2009 Oct; 27(28):4774-80. PubMed ID: 19720925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective diagnostic accuracy study of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography, multidetector row computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in primary diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer.
Kauhanen SP; Komar G; Seppänen MP; Dean KI; Minn HR; Kajander SA; Rinta-Kiikka I; Alanen K; Borra RJ; Puolakkainen PA; Nuutila P; Ovaska JT
Ann Surg; 2009 Dec; 250(6):957-63. PubMed ID: 19687736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14.
Ram-Wolff C; Vercellino L; Brice P; La Selva R; Bagot M
Eur J Dermatol; 2017 Oct; 27(5):496-504. PubMed ID: 28721937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. "One-stop-shop" staging: should we prefer FDG-PET/CT or MRI for the detection of bone metastases?
Heusner T; Gölitz P; Hamami M; Eberhardt W; Esser S; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Jun; 78(3):430-5. PubMed ID: 19945240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. FDG PET in early stage cutaneous malignant melanoma.
McIvor J; Siew T; Campbell A; McCarthy M
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2014 Apr; 58(2):149-54; quiz 266. PubMed ID: 24690243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic accuracy of (18)F-FDG-PET/CT in early and late stages of high-risk cutaneous malignant melanoma.
Gellén E; Sántha O; Janka E; Juhász I; Péter Z; Erdei I; Lukács R; Fedinecz N; Galuska L; Remenyik É; Emri G
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2015 Oct; 29(10):1938-44. PubMed ID: 25753249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness of adding FDG-PET or CT to the diagnostic work-up of patients with stage III melanoma.
Bastiaannet E; Uyl-de Groot CA; Brouwers AH; van der Jagt EJ; Hoekstra OS; Oyen W; Verzijlbergen F; van Ooijen B; Thompson JF; Hoekstra HJ
Ann Surg; 2012 Apr; 255(4):771-6. PubMed ID: 22367443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic performance of whole body dual modality 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging for N- and M-staging of malignant melanoma: experience with 250 consecutive patients.
Reinhardt MJ; Joe AY; Jaeger U; Huber A; Matthies A; Bucerius J; Roedel R; Strunk H; Bieber T; Biersack HJ; Tüting T
J Clin Oncol; 2006 Mar; 24(7):1178-87. PubMed ID: 16505438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of high-risk melanoma: comparison of [18F]FDG PET and high-dose 67Ga SPET.
Kalff V; Hicks RJ; Ware RE; Greer B; Binns DS; Hogg A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2002 Apr; 29(4):506-15. PubMed ID: 11914889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
