These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

670 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21288523)

  • 1. Computed-tomography-based finite-element models of long bones can accurately capture strain response to bending and torsion.
    Varghese B; Short D; Penmetsa R; Goswami T; Hangartner T
    J Biomech; 2011 Apr; 44(7):1374-9. PubMed ID: 21288523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experimental validation of a finite element model of a human cadaveric tibia.
    Gray HA; Taddei F; Zavatsky AB; Cristofolini L; Gill HS
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Jun; 130(3):031016. PubMed ID: 18532865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
    Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimation of Young's modulus in swine cortical bone using quantitative computed tomography.
    Kato N; Koshino T; Saito T; Takeuchi R
    Bull Hosp Jt Dis; 1998; 57(4):183-6. PubMed ID: 9926256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Verified and validated finite element analyses of humeri.
    Dahan G; Trabelsi N; Safran O; Yosibash Z
    J Biomech; 2016 May; 49(7):1094-1102. PubMed ID: 26972763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Load distribution and the predictive power of morphological indices in the distal radius and tibia by high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography.
    MacNeil JA; Boyd SK
    Bone; 2007 Jul; 41(1):129-37. PubMed ID: 17442649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of mechanical properties of cortical bone by quantitative computed tomography.
    Duchemin L; Bousson V; Raossanaly C; Bergot C; Laredo JD; Skalli W; Mitton D
    Med Eng Phys; 2008 Apr; 30(3):321-8. PubMed ID: 17596993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Concept and development of an orthotropic FE model of the proximal femur.
    Wirtz DC; Pandorf T; Portheine F; Radermacher K; Schiffers N; Prescher A; Weichert D; Niethard FU
    J Biomech; 2003 Feb; 36(2):289-93. PubMed ID: 12547369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of geometric and threshold definitions on cortical bone metrics assessed by in vivo high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography.
    Davis KA; Burghardt AJ; Link TM; Majumdar S
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2007 Nov; 81(5):364-71. PubMed ID: 17952361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Shape and function of the diaphysis of the human tibia.
    Cristofolini L; Angeli E; Juszczyk JM; Juszczyk MM
    J Biomech; 2013 Jul; 46(11):1882-92. PubMed ID: 23726289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. To what extent can linear finite element models of human femora predict failure under stance and fall loading configurations?
    Schileo E; Balistreri L; Grassi L; Cristofolini L; Taddei F
    J Biomech; 2014 Nov; 47(14):3531-8. PubMed ID: 25261321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigating the mechanical response of paediatric bone under bending and torsion using finite element analysis.
    Altai Z; Viceconti M; Offiah AC; Li X
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2018 Aug; 17(4):1001-1009. PubMed ID: 29525976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Calculation of tibial loading using strain gauges.
    Funk JR; Crandall JR
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2006; 42():160-5. PubMed ID: 16817602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of quantitative computed-tomography-based strength indicators for the identification of low bone-strength individuals in a clinical environment.
    Varghese B; Short D; Hangartner T
    Bone; 2012 Jan; 50(1):357-63. PubMed ID: 22036909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method.
    Bessho M; Ohnishi I; Matsuyama J; Matsumoto T; Imai K; Nakamura K
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(8):1745-53. PubMed ID: 17034798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Finite element analysis of a femur to deconstruct the paradox of bone curvature.
    Jade S; Tamvada KH; Strait DS; Grosse IR
    J Theor Biol; 2014 Jan; 341():53-63. PubMed ID: 24099719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trabecular plates and rods determine elastic modulus and yield strength of human trabecular bone.
    Wang J; Zhou B; Liu XS; Fields AJ; Sanyal A; Shi X; Adams M; Keaveny TM; Guo XE
    Bone; 2015 Mar; 72():71-80. PubMed ID: 25460571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Constructing anisotropic finite element model of bone from computed tomography (CT).
    Kazembakhshi S; Luo Y
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):2619-26. PubMed ID: 25226965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A modified method for assigning material properties to FE models of bones.
    Helgason B; Taddei F; Pálsson H; Schileo E; Cristofolini L; Viceconti M; Brynjólfsson S
    Med Eng Phys; 2008 May; 30(4):444-53. PubMed ID: 17627862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An investigation to determine if a single validated density-elasticity relationship can be used for subject specific finite element analyses of human long bones.
    Eberle S; Göttlinger M; Augat P
    Med Eng Phys; 2013 Jul; 35(7):875-83. PubMed ID: 23010570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.