142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21288791)
1. Development of a rapid, 96-well alkaline based differential DNA extraction method for sexual assault evidence.
Hudlow WR; Buoncristiani MR
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Jan; 6(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 21288791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automation of the standard DNA differential extraction on the Hamilton AutoLys STAR system: A proof-of-concept study.
Timken MD; Klein SB; Kubala S; Scharnhorst G; Buoncristiani MR; Miller KWP
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():96-104. PubMed ID: 30785062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acoustic differential extraction for forensic analysis of sexual assault evidence.
Norris JV; Evander M; Horsman-Hall KM; Nilsson J; Laurell T; Landers JP
Anal Chem; 2009 Aug; 81(15):6089-95. PubMed ID: 19591449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inferring the presence of spermatozoa in forensic samples based on male DNA fractionation following differential extraction.
Alderson G; Gurevitch H; Casimiro T; Reid B; Millman J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():225-232. PubMed ID: 30077873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Extraction of DNA from forensic-type sexual assault specimens using simple, rapid sonication procedures.
Crouse CA; Ban JD; D'Alessio JK
Biotechniques; 1993 Oct; 15(4):641-4, 646, 648. PubMed ID: 7902722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving the efficacy of the standard DNA differential extraction method for sexual assault evidence.
Timken MD; Klein SB; Buoncristiani MR
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 May; 34():170-177. PubMed ID: 29494880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microchip-based cell lysis and DNA extraction from sperm cells for application to forensic analysis.
Bienvenue JM; Duncalf N; Marchiarullo D; Ferrance JP; Landers JP
J Forensic Sci; 2006 Mar; 51(2):266-73. PubMed ID: 16566759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Post-coital vaginal sampling with nylon flocked swabs improves DNA typing.
Benschop CC; Wiebosch DC; Kloosterman AD; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2010 Feb; 4(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 20129470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating the efficacy of DNA differential extraction methods for sexual assault evidence.
Klein SB; Buoncristiani MR
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():109-117. PubMed ID: 28419902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Separation of sperm and epithelial cells in a microfabricated device: potential application to forensic analysis of sexual assault evidence.
Horsman KM; Barker SL; Ferrance JP; Forrest KA; Koen KA; Landers JP
Anal Chem; 2005 Feb; 77(3):742-9. PubMed ID: 15679339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Enhanced recovery of spermatozoa and comprehensive lysis of epithelial cells from sexual assault samples having a low cell counts or aged up to one year.
Lounsbury JA; Nambiar SM; Karlsson A; Cunniffe H; Norris JV; Ferrance JP; Landers JP
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jan; 8(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 24315594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The application of alkaline lysis and pressure cycling technology in the differential extraction of DNA from sperm and epithelial cells recovered from cotton swabs.
Nori DV; McCord BR
Anal Bioanal Chem; 2015 Sep; 407(23):6975-84. PubMed ID: 26055880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sperm Hy-Liter™: an effective tool for the detection of spermatozoa in sexual assault exhibits.
De Moors A; Georgalis T; Armstrong G; Modler J; Frégeau CJ
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 May; 7(3):367-79. PubMed ID: 23571070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Alternative direct-to-amplification sperm cell lysis techniques for sexual assault sample processing.
Schellhammer SK; Hudson BC; Cox JO; Dawson Green T
J Forensic Sci; 2022 Jul; 67(4):1668-1678. PubMed ID: 35285573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automation of the Differential Digestion Process of Sexual Assault Evidence.
Wong H; Mihalovich J
J Forensic Sci; 2019 Mar; 64(2):539-550. PubMed ID: 30044890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Material modifications for the alkaline differential extraction method for sexual assault evidence.
Hudlow WR; Buoncristiani MR
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Jul; 7(4):e104-5. PubMed ID: 23651586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of an alkaline lysis method for the extraction of DNA from whole blood and forensic stains for STR analysis.
Klintschar M; Neuhuber F
J Forensic Sci; 2000 May; 45(3):669-73. PubMed ID: 10855975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Validation of Differential Extraction Kit in forensic sexual assault cases].
Wu D; Cao Y; Xu Y; He BF; Bi G; Zhou HG
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Dec; 25(6):440-2. PubMed ID: 20225622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Filtration based DNA preparation for sexual assault cases.
Garvin AM
J Forensic Sci; 2003 Sep; 48(5):1084-7. PubMed ID: 14535671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between MACSprep™ forensic sperm microbead kit and Erase Sperm Isolation kit for the enrichment of sperm fractions recovered from sexual assault samples.
Grosjean F; Favre M; Castella V
Int J Legal Med; 2023 Jan; 137(1):267-278. PubMed ID: 35773355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
