165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21288873)
1. Inference of mutation parameters and selective constraint in mammalian coding sequences by approximate Bayesian computation.
Keightley PD; Eöry L; Halligan DL; Kirkpatrick M
Genetics; 2011 Apr; 187(4):1153-61. PubMed ID: 21288873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Distributions of selectively constrained sites and deleterious mutation rates in the hominid and murid genomes.
Eory L; Halligan DL; Keightley PD
Mol Biol Evol; 2010 Jan; 27(1):177-92. PubMed ID: 19759235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Are Synonymous Sites in Primates and Rodents Functionally Constrained?
Price N; Graur D
J Mol Evol; 2016 Jan; 82(1):51-64. PubMed ID: 26563252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Conditional Approximate Bayesian Computation: A New Approach for Across-Site Dependency in High-Dimensional Mutation-Selection Models.
Laurin-Lemay S; Rodrigue N; Lartillot N; Philippe H
Mol Biol Evol; 2018 Nov; 35(11):2819-2834. PubMed ID: 30203003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genomic selective constraints in murid noncoding DNA.
Gaffney DJ; Keightley PD
PLoS Genet; 2006 Nov; 2(11):e204. PubMed ID: 17166057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Extensively Parameterized Mutation-Selection Models Reliably Capture Site-Specific Selective Constraint.
Spielman SJ; Wilke CO
Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Nov; 33(11):2990-3002. PubMed ID: 27512115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Methods for incorporating the hypermutability of CpG dinucleotides in detecting natural selection operating at the amino acid sequence level.
Suzuki Y; Gojobori T; Kumar S
Mol Biol Evol; 2009 Oct; 26(10):2275-84. PubMed ID: 19581348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating the parameters of background selection and selective sweeps in
Campos JL; Zhao L; Charlesworth B
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Jun; 114(24):E4762-E4771. PubMed ID: 28559322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CodABC: a computational framework to coestimate recombination, substitution, and molecular adaptation rates by approximate Bayesian computation.
Arenas M; Lopes JS; Beaumont MA; Posada D
Mol Biol Evol; 2015 Apr; 32(4):1109-12. PubMed ID: 25577191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Molecular evolution of the Bovini tribe (Bovidae, Bovinae): is there evidence of rapid evolution or reduced selective constraint in Domestic cattle?
MacEachern S; McEwan J; McCulloch A; Mather A; Savin K; Goddard M
BMC Genomics; 2009 Apr; 10():179. PubMed ID: 19393048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Synonymous and nonsynonymous rate variation in nuclear genes of mammals.
Yang Z; Nielsen R
J Mol Evol; 1998 Apr; 46(4):409-18. PubMed ID: 9541535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Comparison of One-Rate and Two-Rate Inference Frameworks for Site-Specific dN/dS Estimation.
Spielman SJ; Wan S; Wilke CO
Genetics; 2016 Oct; 204(2):499-511. PubMed ID: 27535929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Exploiting CpG hypermutability to identify phenotypically significant variation within human protein-coding genes.
Ying H; Huttley G
Genome Biol Evol; 2011; 3():938-49. PubMed ID: 21398426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A simple method for estimating the intensity of purifying selection in protein-coding genes.
Ophir R; Itoh T; Graur D; Gojobori T
Mol Biol Evol; 1999 Jan; 16(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 10331251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bayesian estimation of nonsynonymous/synonymous rate ratios for pairwise sequence comparisons.
Angelis K; Dos Reis M; Yang Z
Mol Biol Evol; 2014 Jul; 31(7):1902-13. PubMed ID: 24748652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Bayesian model comparison approach to inferring positive selection.
Scheffler K; Seoighe C
Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Dec; 22(12):2531-40. PubMed ID: 16120799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Positive and negative selection on noncoding DNA close to protein-coding genes in wild house mice.
Kousathanas A; Oliver F; Halligan DL; Keightley PD
Mol Biol Evol; 2011 Mar; 28(3):1183-91. PubMed ID: 21059791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Significant selective constraint at 4-fold degenerate sites in the avian genome and its consequence for detection of positive selection.
Künstner A; Nabholz B; Ellegren H
Genome Biol Evol; 2011; 3():1381-9. PubMed ID: 22042333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimating absolute rates of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution in order to characterize natural selection and date species divergences.
Seo TK; Kishino H; Thorne JL
Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Jul; 21(7):1201-13. PubMed ID: 15014159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nonsynonymous, synonymous and nonsense mutations in human cancer-related genes undergo stronger purifying selections than expectation.
Chu D; Wei L
BMC Cancer; 2019 Apr; 19(1):359. PubMed ID: 30991970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
