These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21289562)

  • 1. Manual and computerized measurement of sagittal vertebral inclination in computed tomography images.
    Vrtovec T; Likar B; Pernuš F
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(13):E875-81. PubMed ID: 21289562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigation of the reproducibility and reliability of sagittal vertebral inclination measurements from MR images of the spine.
    Vrtovec T; Pernuš F; Likar B
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2014 Oct; 38(7):620-7. PubMed ID: 24881499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Manual and computerized measurement of coronal vertebral inclination on MRI images: a pilot study.
    Vrtovec T; Likar B; Pernuš F
    Clin Radiol; 2013 Aug; 68(8):807-14. PubMed ID: 23615034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of four manual and a computerized method for measuring axial vertebral rotation in computed tomography images.
    Vrtovec T; Vengust R; Likar B; Pernus F
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 May; 35(12):E535-41. PubMed ID: 20489565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determination of axial vertebral rotation in MR images: comparison of four manual and a computerized method.
    Vrtovec T; Pernus F; Likar B
    Eur Spine J; 2010 May; 19(5):774-81. PubMed ID: 20204425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variability in Cobb angle measurements using reformatted computerized tomography scans.
    Adam CJ; Izatt MT; Harvey JR; Askin GN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul; 30(14):1664-9. PubMed ID: 16025038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical validation of coronal and sagittal spinal curve measurements based on three-dimensional vertebra vector parameters.
    Somoskeöy S; Tunyogi-Csapó M; Bogyó C; Illés T
    Spine J; 2012 Oct; 12(10):960-8. PubMed ID: 23018164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A computer-aided Cobb angle measurement method and its reliability.
    Zhang J; Lou E; Shi X; Wang Y; Hill DL; Raso JV; Le LH; Lv L
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):383-7. PubMed ID: 20124919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automatic measurement of vertebral rotation in idiopathic scoliosis.
    Adam CJ; Askin GN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Feb; 31(3):E80-3. PubMed ID: 16449892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparison between clinical Cobb angles and measurements performed on vertebral bodies, pedicle centroids and spinous processes].
    Delorme S; Labelle H; Aubin CE; de Guise JA; Dansereau J
    Ann Chir; 1999; 53(8):792-7. PubMed ID: 10584391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of computer-assisted lumbar intervertebral measurements using a novel vertebral motion analysis system.
    Yeager MS; Cook DJ; Cheng BC
    Spine J; 2014 Feb; 14(2):274-81. PubMed ID: 24239805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability analysis of Cobb angle measurements of congenital scoliosis using X-ray and 3D-CT images.
    Tauchi R; Tsuji T; Cahill PJ; Flynn JM; Flynn JM; Glotzbecker M; El-Hawary R; Heflin JA; Imagama S; Joshi AP; Nohara A; Ramirez N; Roye DP; Saito T; Sawyer JR; Smith JT; Kawakami N
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 Jan; 26(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 26377663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative analysis of spinal curvature in 3D: application to CT images of normal spine.
    Vrtovec T; Likar B; Pernus F
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(7):1895-908. PubMed ID: 18364545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of a simple computerized tool for measuring spinal and pelvic parameters.
    Kim CH; Chung CK; Hong HS; Kim EH; Kim MJ; Park BJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Feb; 16(2):154-62. PubMed ID: 22136391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy and reliability of coronal and sagittal spinal curvature data based on patient-specific three-dimensional models created by the EOS 2D/3D imaging system.
    Somoskeöy S; Tunyogi-Csapó M; Bogyó C; Illés T
    Spine J; 2012 Nov; 12(11):1052-9. PubMed ID: 23102842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Supine thoracolumbar sagittal spine alignment: comparing computerized tomography and plain radiographs.
    Abdel MP; Bodemer WS; Anderson PA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Feb; 37(4):340-5. PubMed ID: 22333928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Defining normal vertebral angulation at the thoracolumbar junction.
    Crawford MB; Toms AP; Shepstone L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 193(1):W33-7. PubMed ID: 19542380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability of radiographic measures for infantile idiopathic scoliosis.
    Corona J; Sanders JO; Luhmann SJ; Diab M; Vitale MG
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jun; 94(12):e86. PubMed ID: 22717838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional analysis of thoracic apical sagittal alignment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
    Hayashi K; Upasani VV; Pawelek JB; Aubin CE; Labelle H; Lenke LG; Jackson R; Newton PO
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(8):792-7. PubMed ID: 19365246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Sagittal Thoracic Modifier Component of the Lenke Classification System in Moderate and Severe Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Reliability and Reproducibility of Measurements Among 5 Observers.
    El-Fiky T; Elsagheer H; Darwish M; Essmat H; Kamal R; Hasan A; Shoukry F; Allam Y
    Clin Spine Surg; 2019 Jul; 32(6):E266-E271. PubMed ID: 30807366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.