These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21289563)
1. Centroid method: reliable method to determine the coronal curvature of scoliosis: a case control study comparing with the Cobb method. Hong JY; Suh SW; Modi HN; Hur CY; Song HR; Ryu JH Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(13):E855-61. PubMed ID: 21289563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Centroid method: an alternative method of determining coronal curvature in scoliosis. A comparative study versus Cobb method in the degenerative spine. Hong JY; Suh SW; Modi HN; Lee JM; Park SY Spine J; 2013 Apr; 13(4):421-7. PubMed ID: 23332390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparative analysis of 4 curvature measurement methods in early-onset scoliosis. Hwang JH; Hong JY; Suh SW; Yang JH; Lee JM Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Sep; 37(20):E1273-81. PubMed ID: 22739673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability analysis of a smartphone-aided measurement method for the Cobb angle of scoliosis. Qiao J; Liu Z; Xu L; Wu T; Zheng X; Zhu Z; Zhu F; Qian B; Qiu Y J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jun; 25(4):E88-92. PubMed ID: 22237178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability of Coronal Curvature Measures in Premature Scoliosis: Comparison of 4 Methods Using Inverted Digital Luminescence Radiography. Hong JY; Hwang JH; Suh SW; Yang JH; Kim JR; Bae YG Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jun; 40(12):E701-12. PubMed ID: 25768689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability analysis for radiographic measures of lumbar lordosis in adult scoliosis: a case-control study comparing 6 methods. Hong JY; Suh SW; Modi HN; Hur CY; Song HR; Park JH Eur Spine J; 2010 Sep; 19(9):1551-7. PubMed ID: 20437183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical validation of coronal and sagittal spinal curve measurements based on three-dimensional vertebra vector parameters. Somoskeöy S; Tunyogi-Csapó M; Bogyó C; Illés T Spine J; 2012 Oct; 12(10):960-8. PubMed ID: 23018164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A reliability and validity study for different coronal angles using ultrasound imaging in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Brink RC; Wijdicks SPJ; Tromp IN; Schlösser TPC; Kruyt MC; Beek FJA; Castelein RM Spine J; 2018 Jun; 18(6):979-985. PubMed ID: 29056566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Supine magnetic resonance imaging Cobb measurements for idiopathic scoliosis are linearly related to measurements from standing plain radiographs. Lee MC; Solomito M; Patel A Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(11):E656-61. PubMed ID: 23429689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability analysis of Cobb angle measurements of congenital scoliosis using X-ray and 3D-CT images. Tauchi R; Tsuji T; Cahill PJ; Flynn JM; Flynn JM; Glotzbecker M; El-Hawary R; Heflin JA; Imagama S; Joshi AP; Nohara A; Ramirez N; Roye DP; Saito T; Sawyer JR; Smith JT; Kawakami N Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 Jan; 26(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 26377663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intra- and Interrater Reliability of Cobb Angle Measurements on the Plane of Maximum Curvature Using Ultrasound Imaging Method. Trac S; Zheng R; Hill DL; Lou E Spine Deform; 2019 Jan; 7(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 30587314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability of radiographic measures for infantile idiopathic scoliosis. Corona J; Sanders JO; Luhmann SJ; Diab M; Vitale MG J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jun; 94(12):e86. PubMed ID: 22717838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A computer-aided Cobb angle measurement method and its reliability. Zhang J; Lou E; Shi X; Wang Y; Hill DL; Raso JV; Le LH; Lv L J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):383-7. PubMed ID: 20124919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability analysis for manual measurement of coronal plane deformity in adolescent scoliosis. Are 30 x 90 cm plain films better than digitized small films? De Carvalho A; Vialle R; Thomsen L; Amzallag J; Cluzel G; le Pointe HD; Mary P Eur Spine J; 2007 Oct; 16(10):1615-20. PubMed ID: 17619912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability analysis of shoulder balance measures: comparison of the 4 available methods. Hong JY; Suh SW; Yang JH; Park SY; Han JH Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Dec; 38(26):E1684-90. PubMed ID: 23804158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of manual and digital measurements in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Kuklo TR; Potter BK; Schroeder TM; O'Brien MF Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 May; 31(11):1240-6. PubMed ID: 16688038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability of lumbar lordosis measurement in patients with spondylolisthesis: a case-control study comparing the Cobb, centroid, and posterior tangent methods. Hwang JH; Modi HN; Suh SW; Hong JY; Park YH; Park JH; Yang JH Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Aug; 35(18):1691-700. PubMed ID: 20543767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy and repeatability of a new method for measuring scoliosis curvature. He JW; Yan ZH; Liu J; Yu ZK; Wang XY; Bai GH; Ye XJ; Zhang X Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(9):E323-9. PubMed ID: 19531987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]