These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21289757)

  • 1. The electronic fetal monitor: should every mother have one?
    Dixon AS
    Can Fam Physician; 1981 Jun; 27():1023-8. PubMed ID: 21289757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of electronic fetal monitoring on rates of early neonatal death, low Apgar score, and cesarean section.
    Greenland S; Olsen J; Rachootin P; Pedersen GT
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1985; 64(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 3976379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: early neonatal outcomes associated with normal rate, fetal stress, and fetal distress.
    Dellinger EH; Boehm FH; Crane MM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jan; 182(1 Pt 1):214-20. PubMed ID: 10649181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The current status of intrapartum fetal monitoring.
    Ott WJ
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1976 May; 31(5):339-64. PubMed ID: 772506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neonatal outcome and delivery mode in labors with repetitive fetal scalp blood sampling.
    Holzmann M; Wretler S; Cnattingius S; Nordström L
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Jan; 184():97-102. PubMed ID: 25483990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fetal heart rate monitoring during labour--too frequent intervention, too little benefit?
    Prentice A; Lind T
    Lancet; 1987 Dec; 2(8572):1375-7. PubMed ID: 2890961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fetal health surveillance in labour.
    Liston R; Crane J; Hamilton E; Hughes O; Kuling S; MacKinnon C; McNamara H; Milne K; Richardson B; Trépanie MJ; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2002 Mar; 24(3):250-76; quiz 277-80. PubMed ID: 12196876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Dublin randomized controlled trial of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring.
    MacDonald D; Grant A; Sheridan-Pereira M; Boylan P; Chalmers I
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Jul; 152(5):524-39. PubMed ID: 3893132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors involved in the interpretation of fetal monitor tracings.
    Helfand M; Marton K; Ueland K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Mar; 151(6):737-44. PubMed ID: 3976782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intermittent versus continuous electronic monitoring in labour: a randomised study.
    Herbst A; Ingemarsson I
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1994 Aug; 101(8):663-8. PubMed ID: 7947499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Evaluation of selected morphological markers of inflammation in afterbirth from idiopathic premature labors].
    Raba G; Kotarski J
    Ginekol Pol; 2010 Jun; 81(6):435-40. PubMed ID: 20695193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monitoring intrapartum fetal heart rates by mothers in labour in two public hospitals: an initiative to improve maternal and neonatal healthcare in Liberia.
    Borzie K; Jasper N; Southall DP; MacDonald R; Kola AA; Dolo O; Magnus A; Watson SD; Casement M; Dahn B; Jallah W
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Jun; 20(1):362. PubMed ID: 32536345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The importance of the learning process in ST analysis interpretation and its impact in improving clinical and neonatal outcomes.
    Timonen S; Holmberg K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):620.e1-620.e7. PubMed ID: 29577914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electronic fetal monitoring during labor.
    Kurse J
    J Fam Pract; 1982 Jul; 15(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 7086382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An evaluation of the electronic fetal monitor as a feedback device during labor.
    Brasted WS; Callahan EJ
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1984; 17(2):261-6. PubMed ID: 6735956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The evaluation of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in high-risk pregnancy.
    Haverkamp AD; Thompson HE; McFee JG; Cetrulo C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Jun; 125(3):310-20. PubMed ID: 5895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of oxytocin and oral prostaglandin E2 on uterine contractility and fetal heart rate patterns.
    Freidman EA; Sachtleben MR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1978 Feb; 130(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 629283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Significance of meconium during labor.
    Miller FC; Sacks DA; Yeh SY; Paul RH; Schifrin BS; Martin CB; Hon EH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1975 Jul; 122(5):573-80. PubMed ID: 238396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comments on past and present situation of intensive monitoring of the fetus during labor.
    Saling E
    J Perinat Med; 1996; 24(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8708934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A controlled trial of the differential effects of intrapartum fetal monitoring.
    Haverkamp AD; Orleans M; Langendoerfer S; McFee J; Murphy J; Thompson HE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Jun; 134(4):399-412. PubMed ID: 453276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.