These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21289917)

  • 1. Longevity of dental amalgam in comparison to composite materials.
    Antony K; Genser D; Hiebinger C; Windisch F
    GMS Health Technol Assess; 2008 Nov; 4():Doc12. PubMed ID: 21289917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent posterior teeth.
    Worthington HV; Khangura S; Seal K; Mierzwinski-Urban M; Veitz-Keenan A; Sahrmann P; Schmidlin PR; Davis D; Iheozor-Ejiofor Z; Rasines Alcaraz MG
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Aug; 8(8):CD005620. PubMed ID: 34387873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent or adult posterior teeth.
    Rasines Alcaraz MG; Veitz-Keenan A; Sahrmann P; Schmidlin PR; Davis D; Iheozor-Ejiofor Z
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Mar; (3):CD005620. PubMed ID: 24683067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. WITHDRAWN: Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.
    Yengopal V; Harnekar SY; Patel N; Siegfried N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Oct; 10(10):CD004483. PubMed ID: 27748505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.
    Yengopal V; Harneker SY; Patel N; Siegfried N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Apr; (2):CD004483. PubMed ID: 19370602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-coloured alternatives to amalgam.
    Roulet JF
    J Dent; 1997 Nov; 25(6):459-73. PubMed ID: 9604577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical effectiveness of direct class II restorations - a meta-analysis.
    Heintze SD; Rousson V
    J Adhes Dent; 2012 Aug; 14(5):407-31. PubMed ID: 23082310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Black or white--Which choice for the molars? Part 2. Which does one choose for the restoration of posterior teeth: amalgam or composite?].
    De Moor R; Delmé K
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2008; 63(4):135-46. PubMed ID: 19227687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The longevity of amalgam versus compomer/composite restorations in posterior primary and permanent teeth: findings From the New England Children's Amalgam Trial.
    Soncini JA; Maserejian NN; Trachtenberg F; Tavares M; Hayes C
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 Jun; 138(6):763-72. PubMed ID: 17545265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Clinical pattern of secondary dental caries in relation to tissue defect class and type of filling material].
    Krupiński J; Krupińska A; Lejman L; Modelska D; Roterman I; Sciegienny-Malec J; Rutkowska H
    Czas Stomatol; 1990 Oct; 43(10):595-9. PubMed ID: 2104302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
    Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
    J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: the 10-year report.
    Gaengler P; Hoyer I; Montag R
    J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(2):185-94. PubMed ID: 11570687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adhesively bonded versus non-bonded amalgam restorations for dental caries.
    Agnihotry A; Fedorowicz Z; Nasser M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Mar; 3(3):CD007517. PubMed ID: 26954446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selection of restorative materials in dental treatment of children and adults in public and private dental care in Finland.
    Widström E; Forss H
    Swed Dent J; 1994; 18(1-2):1-7. PubMed ID: 8052946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Decision criteria for replacement of fillings: a retrospective study.
    Kirsch J; Tchorz J; Hellwig E; Tauböck TT; Attin T; Hannig C
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2016 Nov; 2(2):121-128. PubMed ID: 29744158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prevalence and incidence of caries lesions in relation to placement and replacement of fillings: a longitudinal observational radiographic study of an adult Danish population.
    Kirkevang LL; Vaeth M; Wenzel A
    Caries Res; 2009; 43(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 19439950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Single crowns versus conventional fillings for the restoration of root filled teeth.
    Fedorowicz Z; Carter B; de Souza RF; Chaves CA; Nasser M; Sequeira-Byron P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 May; (5):CD009109. PubMed ID: 22592736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimental secondary caries around amalgam, composite and glass ionomer cement fillings in human teeth.
    Hotz PR
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1979 Sep; 89(9):965-86. PubMed ID: 293928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Best-practice prevention alone or with conventional or biological caries management for 3- to 7-year-olds: the FiCTION three-arm RCT.
    Maguire A; Clarkson JE; Douglas GV; Ryan V; Homer T; Marshman Z; McColl E; Wilson N; Vale L; Robertson M; Abouhajar A; Holmes RD; Freeman R; Chadwick B; Deery C; Wong F; Innes NP
    Health Technol Assess; 2020 Jan; 24(1):1-174. PubMed ID: 31928611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.