125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21290022)
1. Distal humerus internal fixation: a biomechanical comparison of 90° and parallel constructs.
Kollias CM; Darcy SP; Reed JG; Rosvold JM; Shrive NG; Hildebrand KA
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2010 Sep; 39(9):440-4. PubMed ID: 21290022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone.
O'Toole RV; Andersen RC; Vesnovsky O; Alexander M; Topoleski LD; Nascone JW; Sciadini MF; Turen C; Eglseder WA
J Orthop Trauma; 2008; 22(10):709-15. PubMed ID: 18978547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanical comparison in cadaver specimens of three different 90-degree double-plate osteosyntheses for simulated C2-type distal humerus fractures with varying bone densities.
Schuster I; Korner J; Arzdorf M; Schwieger K; Diederichs G; Linke B
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Feb; 22(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 18349779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical comparison of parallel versus 90-90 plating of bicolumn distal humerus fractures with intra-articular comminution.
Got C; Shuck J; Biercevicz A; Paller D; Mulcahey M; Zimmermann M; Blaine T; Green A
J Hand Surg Am; 2012 Dec; 37(12):2512-8. PubMed ID: 23174063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Locking plates in osteoporosis: a biomechanical cadaveric study of diaphyseal humerus fractures.
Davis C; Stall A; Knutsen E; Whitney A; Becker E; Hsieh AH; OʼToole RV
J Orthop Trauma; 2012 Apr; 26(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 22068207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fixation of extra-articular distal humerus fractures using one locking plate versus two reconstruction plates: a laboratory study.
Tejwani NC; Murthy A; Park J; McLaurin TM; Egol KA; Kummer FJ
J Trauma; 2009 Mar; 66(3):795-9. PubMed ID: 19276755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Are conventional reconstruction plates equivalent to precontoured locking plates for distal humerus fracture fixation? A biomechanics cadaver study.
Koonce RC; Baldini TH; Morgan SJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Aug; 27(7):697-701. PubMed ID: 22538250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Parallel Plating of Simulated Distal Humerus Fractures Demonstrates Increased Stiffness Relative to Orthogonal Plating With a Distal Humerus Locking Plate System.
Taylor PA; Owen JR; Benfield CP; Wayne JS; Boardman ND
J Orthop Trauma; 2016 Apr; 30(4):e118-22. PubMed ID: 26529123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Proximal humerus fracture rotational stability after fixation using a locking plate or a fixed-angle locked nail: the role of implant stiffness.
Foruria AM; Carrascal MT; Revilla C; Munuera L; Sanchez-Sotelo J
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 May; 25(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 20153916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Locked plate fixation of osteoporotic humeral shaft fractures: are two locking screws per segment enough?
Hak DJ; Althausen P; Hazelwood SJ
J Orthop Trauma; 2010 Apr; 24(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 20335752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Locking versus nonlocking T-plates for dorsal and volar fixation of dorsally comminuted distal radius fractures: a biomechanical study.
Trease C; McIff T; Toby EB
J Hand Surg Am; 2005 Jul; 30(4):756-63. PubMed ID: 16039369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical comparison of two different periarticular plating systems for stabilization of complex distal humerus fractures.
Schwartz A; Oka R; Odell T; Mahar A
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Nov; 21(9):950-5. PubMed ID: 16782245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A biomechanical comparison of plate configuration in distal humerus fractures.
Arnander MW; Reeves A; MacLeod IA; Pinto TM; Khaleel A
J Orthop Trauma; 2008; 22(5):332-6. PubMed ID: 18448987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of distal humerus fracture fixation: a biomechanical study.
Jacobson SR; Glisson RR; Urbaniak JR
J South Orthop Assoc; 1997; 6(4):241-9. PubMed ID: 9434244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Complex distal humerus fractures-comparison of polyaxial locking and nonlocking screw configurations-a preliminary biomechanical study.
Hungerer S; Wipf F; von Oldenburg G; Augat P; Penzkofer R
J Orthop Trauma; 2014 Mar; 28(3):130-6. PubMed ID: 23736772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical evaluation of methods of internal fixation of the distal humerus.
Schemitsch EH; Tencer AF; Henley MB
J Orthop Trauma; 1994 Dec; 8(6):468-75. PubMed ID: 7869160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical testing of unstable humeral shaft fracture plating.
Catanzarite J; Alan R; Baig R; Forno P; Benson L
J Surg Orthop Adv; 2009; 18(4):175-81. PubMed ID: 19995496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Plate selection for fixation of extra-articular distal humerus fractures: a biomechanical comparison of three different implants.
Scolaro JA; Hsu JE; Svach DJ; Mehta S
Injury; 2014 Dec; 45(12):2040-4. PubMed ID: 25249244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Biomechanical comparative study of three types of osteosynthesis in the treatment of supra and intercondylar fractures of the humerus in adults].
Fornasiéri C; Staub C; Tourné Y; Rumelhart C; Saragaglia D
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1997; 83(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 9255359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative biomechanical analysis of implants for the stabilization of proximal humerus fractures.
Füchtmeier B; May R; Fierlbeck J; Hammer J; Nerlich M
Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(4-5):261-70. PubMed ID: 17065749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
