221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21290140)
1. A comparison of misoprostol, controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert and oxytocin for cervical ripening.
Silfeler DB; Tandogan B; Ayvaci H; Silfeler I; Yenidede I; Dayicioglu V
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Dec; 284(6):1331-7. PubMed ID: 21290140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
Meyer M; Pflum J; Howard D
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Neiger R; Greaves PC
Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Misoprostol versus Dinoprostone for pre-induction cervical ripening at-term.
Chitrakar NS
J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2012 Jan; 10(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 22929629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone.
Calder AA; Loughney AD; Weir CJ; Barber JW
BJOG; 2008 Sep; 115(10):1279-88. PubMed ID: 18715414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Induction of labor with misoprostol in pregnancies with advanced maternal age.
Zeteroglu S; Sahin GH; Sahin HA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Dec; 129(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 16406221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomised controlled trial of low-dose misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal pessaries for cervical priming.
Tan TC; Yan SY; Chua TM; Biswas A; Chong YS
BJOG; 2010 Sep; 117(10):1270-7. PubMed ID: 20722643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: misoprostol vs oxytocin.
Fonseca L; Wood HC; Lucas MJ; Ramin SM; Phatak D; Gilstrap LC; Yeomans ER
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 199(3):305.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18771993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Oxytocin versus sustained-release dinoprostone vaginal pessary for labor induction of unfavorable cervix with Bishop score ≥ 4 and ≤ 6: a randomized controlled trial.
Koc O; Duran B; Ozdemirci S; Albayrak M; Koc U
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2013 Apr; 39(4):790-8. PubMed ID: 23167718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomized controlled trial of 24-hour vaginal dinoprostone pessary compared to gel for induction of labor in term pregnancies with a Bishop score < or = 4.
Triglia MT; Palamara F; Lojacono A; Prefumo F; Frusca T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 May; 89(5):651-7. PubMed ID: 20199360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Vaginal misoprostol in managing premature rupture of membranes.
Ayad IA
East Mediterr Health J; 2002; 8(4-5):515-20. PubMed ID: 15603033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin and vaginal PGE2 for second-trimester labor induction.
Ramsey PS; Savage K; Lincoln T; Owen J
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 104(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 15229013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of glyceryl trinitrate, misoprostol, and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening in term pregnancy.
Sharma Y; Kumar S; Mittal S; Misra R; Dadhwal V
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Jun; 31(3):210-5. PubMed ID: 15916656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
Chang CH; Chang FM
J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of different doses of intravaginal misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Saxena P; Puri M; Bajaj M; Mishra A; Trivedi SS
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2011 Jul; 15(7):759-63. PubMed ID: 21780543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of two preparations of dinoprostone for pre-induction of labour in nulliparous women with very unfavourable cervical condition: a randomised clinical trial.
Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Verocchi G; Volpe A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Apr; 119(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 15808378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Cervical ripening at term. A randomized and prospective study: Misoprotol versus dinoprostone].
Trabelsi H; Mathlouthi N; Zayen S; Dhouib M; Chaabene K; Trabelsi K; Amouri H; Ben Ayed B; Guermazi M
Tunis Med; 2012 May; 90(5):362-9. PubMed ID: 22585642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert: a randomized controlled trial.
Wing DA;
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 112(4):801-12. PubMed ID: 18827122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
