These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21290243)

  • 1. Integration of visual and auditory information for hand actions: preliminary evidence for the contribution of natural sounds to grasping.
    Sedda A; Monaco S; Bottini G; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Mar; 209(3):365-74. PubMed ID: 21290243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Grasping without vision: time normalizing grip aperture profiles yields spurious grip scaling to target size.
    Whitwell RL; Goodale MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Aug; 51(10):1878-87. PubMed ID: 23796704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Grasping the sound: Auditory pitch influences size processing in motor planning.
    Rinaldi L; Lega C; Cattaneo Z; Girelli L; Bernardi NF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jan; 42(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 26280267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Control of aperture closure initiation during reach-to-grasp movements under manipulations of visual feedback and trunk involvement in Parkinson's disease.
    Rand MK; Lemay M; Squire LM; Shimansky YP; Stelmach GE
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Mar; 201(3):509-25. PubMed ID: 19902195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of the reach-to-grasp movement between children and adults: a kinematic study.
    Zoia S; Pezzetta E; Blason L; Scabar A; Carrozzi M; Bulgheroni M; Castiello U
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2006; 30(2):719-38. PubMed ID: 16995833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gender differences in non-standard mapping tasks: A kinematic study using pantomimed reach-to-grasp actions.
    Copley-Mills J; Connolly JD; Cavina-Pratesi C
    Cortex; 2016 Sep; 82():244-254. PubMed ID: 27410715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical constraints do not influence pantomime-grasping adherence to Weber's law: A reply to Utz et al. (2015).
    Manzone J; Davarpanah Jazi S; Whitwell RL; Heath M
    Vision Res; 2017 Jan; 130():31-35. PubMed ID: 27876512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When perception trips action! The increase in the perceived size of both hand and target matters in reaching and grasping movements.
    Ambron E; Schettino LF; Coyle M; Jax S; Coslett HB
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Oct; 180():160-168. PubMed ID: 28957732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Grasp aperture corrections in reach-to-grasp movements do not reliably alter size perception.
    van Polanen V
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0248084. PubMed ID: 34520478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Grasping with the left and right hand: a kinematic study.
    Grosskopf A; Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 168(1-2):230-40. PubMed ID: 16078023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The destination defines the journey: an examination of the kinematics of hand-to-mouth movements.
    Flindall JW; Gonzalez CL
    J Neurophysiol; 2016 Nov; 116(5):2105-2113. PubMed ID: 27512020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gaze strategies during visually-guided versus memory-guided grasping.
    Prime SL; Marotta JJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Mar; 225(2):291-305. PubMed ID: 23239197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of delay on the kinematics of grasping.
    Hu Y; Eagleson R; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 1999 May; 126(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 10333011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of object shape and visual feedback on hand configuration during grasping.
    Schettino LF; Adamovich SV; Poizner H
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Jul; 151(2):158-66. PubMed ID: 12783144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Grasping movements toward seen and handheld objects.
    Camponogara I; Volcic R
    Sci Rep; 2019 Mar; 9(1):3665. PubMed ID: 30842478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory contact cues improve performance when grasping augmented and virtual objects with a tool.
    Zahariev MA; Mackenzie CL
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Apr; 186(4):619-27. PubMed ID: 18214451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Task requirements influence sensory integration during grasping in humans.
    Säfström D; Edin BB
    Learn Mem; 2004; 11(3):356-63. PubMed ID: 15169866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Grasping Weber's illusion: the effect of receptor density differences on grasping and matching.
    Anema HA; Wolswijk VW; Ruis C; Dijkerman HC
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2008; 25(7-8):951-67. PubMed ID: 19378413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Planning movements well in advance.
    Hesse C; de Grave DD; Franz VH; Brenner E; Smeets JB
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2008; 25(7-8):985-95. PubMed ID: 18608330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visually and memory-guided grasping: aperture shaping exhibits a time-dependent scaling to Weber's law.
    Holmes SA; Mulla A; Binsted G; Heath M
    Vision Res; 2011 Sep; 51(17):1941-8. PubMed ID: 21777599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.