BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21292868)

  • 21. FRAX and its applications in health economics--cost-effectiveness and intervention thresholds using bazedoxifene in a Swedish setting as an example.
    Ström O; Borgström F; Kleman M; McCloskey E; Odén A; Johansson H; Kanis JA
    Bone; 2010 Aug; 47(2):430-7. PubMed ID: 20493983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Low bone mineral density and fracture burden in postmenopausal women.
    Cranney A; Jamal SA; Tsang JF; Josse RG; Leslie WD
    CMAJ; 2007 Sep; 177(6):575-80. PubMed ID: 17846439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Bone mineral density and bone loss measured at the radius to predict the risk of nonspinal osteoporotic fracture.
    Gnudi S; Malavolta N; Lisi L; Ripamonti C
    J Bone Miner Res; 2001 Jun; 16(6):1130-5. PubMed ID: 11393790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Ten-year absolute fracture risk and hip bone strength in Canadian women with systemic lupus erythematosus.
    Lee JJ; Aghdassi E; Cheung AM; Morrison S; Cymet A; Peeva V; Neville C; Hewitt S; DaCosta D; Pineau C; Pope J; Fortin PR
    J Rheumatol; 2012 Jul; 39(7):1378-84. PubMed ID: 22660811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of a hip fracture risk score for assessing elderly women: the Melton Osteoporotic Fracture (MOF) study.
    McGrother CW; Donaldson MM; Clayton D; Abrams KR; Clarke M
    Osteoporos Int; 2002 Jan; 13(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 11883411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of alendronate on the age-specific incidence of symptomatic osteoporotic fractures.
    Hochberg MC; Thompson DE; Black DM; Quandt SA; Cauley J; Geusens P; Ross PD; Baran D;
    J Bone Miner Res; 2005 Jun; 20(6):971-6. PubMed ID: 15883637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. BMD at multiple sites and risk of fracture of multiple types: long-term results from the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures.
    Stone KL; Seeley DG; Lui LY; Cauley JA; Ensrud K; Browner WS; Nevitt MC; Cummings SR;
    J Bone Miner Res; 2003 Nov; 18(11):1947-54. PubMed ID: 14606506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. FRAX calculator and Garvan nomogram in male osteoporotic population.
    Pluskiewicz W; Adamczyk P; Franek E; Sewerynek E; Leszczynski P; Wichrowska H; Napiórkowska L; Stuss M; Ptaszek A; Kostyk T; Golba KS; Garbacz W; Drozdzowska B
    Aging Male; 2014 Sep; 17(3):174-82. PubMed ID: 24456527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Treatment with alendronate prevents fractures in women at highest risk: results from the Fracture Intervention Trial.
    Ensrud KE; Black DM; Palermo L; Bauer DC; Barrett-Connor E; Quandt SA; Thompson DE; Karpf DB
    Arch Intern Med; 1997 Dec 8-22; 157(22):2617-24. PubMed ID: 9531231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The utility of absolute risk prediction using FRAX® and Garvan Fracture Risk Calculator in daily practice.
    van Geel TA; Eisman JA; Geusens PP; van den Bergh JP; Center JR; Dinant GJ
    Maturitas; 2014 Feb; 77(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 24287178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Factors associated with 5-year risk of hip fracture in postmenopausal women.
    Robbins J; Aragaki AK; Kooperberg C; Watts N; Wactawski-Wende J; Jackson RD; LeBoff MS; Lewis CE; Chen Z; Stefanick ML; Cauley J
    JAMA; 2007 Nov; 298(20):2389-98. PubMed ID: 18042916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Contribution of clinical risk factors to bone density-based absolute fracture risk assessment in postmenopausal women.
    Leslie WD; Metge C; Ward L
    Osteoporos Int; 2003 Jun; 14(4):334-8. PubMed ID: 12730741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reasons for discrepancies in hip fracture risk estimates using FRAX and Garvan calculators.
    Billington EO; Gamble GD; Reid IR
    Maturitas; 2016 Mar; 85():11-8. PubMed ID: 26857874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prognosis of fracture: evaluation of predictive accuracy of the FRAX algorithm and Garvan nomogram.
    Sandhu SK; Nguyen ND; Center JR; Pocock NA; Eisman JA; Nguyen TV
    Osteoporos Int; 2010 May; 21(5):863-71. PubMed ID: 19633880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Intervals between bone density testing.
    Reid IR; Gamble GD
    J Bone Miner Res; 2014 Feb; 29(2):389-91. PubMed ID: 23893403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Better bone density reporting: T-score report versus fracture risk report with outcome analysis.
    Greenwald L; Barajas K; White-Greenwald M
    Am J Manag Care; 2003 Oct; 9(10):665-70. PubMed ID: 14572176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Overview of Fracture Prediction Tools.
    Kanis JA; Harvey NC; Johansson H; Odén A; McCloskey EV; Leslie WD
    J Clin Densitom; 2017; 20(3):444-450. PubMed ID: 28716500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Five-year fracture risk assessment in postmenopausal women, using both the POL-RISK calculator and the Garvan nomogram: the Silesia Osteo Active Study.
    Zagórski P; Tabor E; Martela-Tomaszek K; Adamczyk P; Pluskiewicz W
    Arch Osteoporos; 2021 Feb; 16(1):32. PubMed ID: 33594643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Risk of hip fracture derived from relative risks: an analysis applied to the population of Sweden.
    Kanis JA; Johnell O; Oden A; Jonsson B; Dawson A; Dere W
    Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(2):120-7. PubMed ID: 10793869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. FRAX--Where are we now?
    Compston J
    Maturitas; 2015 Nov; 82(3):284-7. PubMed ID: 26277257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.