These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21293153)

  • 1. Matching, an appealing method to avoid confounding?
    de Graaf MA; Jager KJ; Zoccali C; Dekker FW
    Nephron Clin Pract; 2011; 118(4):c315-8. PubMed ID: 21293153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Matching.
    Costanza MC
    Prev Med; 1995 Sep; 24(5):425-33. PubMed ID: 8524715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.
    Brunekreef B; Beelen R; Hoek G; Schouten L; Bausch-Goldbohm S; Fischer P; Armstrong B; Hughes E; Jerrett M; van den Brandt P
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Mar; (139):5-71; discussion 73-89. PubMed ID: 19554969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Supplementary data collection with case-cohort analysis to address potential confounding in a cohort study of thromboembolism in oral contraceptive initiators matched on claims-based propensity scores.
    Eng PM; Seeger JD; Loughlin J; Clifford CR; Mentor S; Walker AM
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 Mar; 17(3):297-305. PubMed ID: 18215000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving the efficiency of nested case-control studies of interaction by selecting controls using counter matching on exposure.
    Cologne JB; Sharp GB; Neriishi K; Verkasalo PK; Land CE; Nakachi K
    Int J Epidemiol; 2004 Jun; 33(3):485-92. PubMed ID: 15105408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bias formulas for external adjustment and sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounders.
    Arah OA; Chiba Y; Greenland S
    Ann Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 18(8):637-46. PubMed ID: 18652982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ignoring the matching variables in cohort studies - when is it valid and why?
    Sjölander A; Greenland S
    Stat Med; 2013 Nov; 32(27):4696-708. PubMed ID: 23761197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Roaming through methodology. XIII. Matching as a rule is not useful].
    Verbeek AL
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 May; 143(20):1037-40. PubMed ID: 10368730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stratification for confounding--part 1: the Mantel-Haenszel formula.
    Tripepi G; Jager KJ; Dekker FW; Zoccali C
    Nephron Clin Pract; 2010; 116(4):c317-21. PubMed ID: 20664286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Epidemiologic studies: pitfalls in interpretation.
    Westhoff CL
    Dialogues Contracept; 1995; 4(5):5-6, 8. PubMed ID: 12288680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The case-control study: a primer for the obstetrician-gynecologist.
    Peipert JF; Grimes DA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jul; 84(1):140-5. PubMed ID: 8008310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Confounders and intermediaries in case-control study designs: a strategy for distinguishing between the two when measured using the same variable.
    Gruneir A; Marras C; Fischer H; Wang X; Gill S; Rochon PA; Anderson GM
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2011 Mar; 20(3):221-8. PubMed ID: 21351302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unpredictable bias when using the missing indicator method or complete case analysis for missing confounder values: an empirical example.
    Knol MJ; Janssen KJ; Donders AR; Egberts AC; Heerdink ER; Grobbee DE; Moons KG; Geerlings MI
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Jul; 63(7):728-36. PubMed ID: 20346625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the estimation and use of propensity scores in case-control and case-cohort studies.
    Månsson R; Joffe MM; Sun W; Hennessy S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 166(3):332-9. PubMed ID: 17504780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two-stage case-control studies: precision of parameter estimates and considerations in selecting sample size.
    Hanley JA; Csizmadi I; Collet JP
    Am J Epidemiol; 2005 Dec; 162(12):1225-34. PubMed ID: 16269581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A closer look at confounding.
    Sonis J
    Fam Med; 1998 Sep; 30(8):584-8. PubMed ID: 9773290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Roaming through methodology. XXVII. Problems with longitudinal studies: confounding of the relationship between age, time of measurement and birth cohort].
    Kemper HC
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Nov; 144(47):2247-51. PubMed ID: 11109468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimating adjusted NNT measures in logistic regression analysis.
    Bender R; Kuss O; Hildebrandt M; Gehrmann U
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(30):5586-95. PubMed ID: 17879268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Longitudinal studies 4: Matching strategies to evaluate risk.
    James MT
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1281():133-43. PubMed ID: 25694307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the impact of confounding (measured and unmeasured) in a case-control study to examine the increased risk of pandemic A/H1N1 associated with receipt of the 2008-9 seasonal influenza vaccine.
    Rosella LC; Groenwold RH; Crowcroft NS
    Vaccine; 2011 Nov; 29(49):9194-200. PubMed ID: 22001885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.