176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21293257)
1. Protein microarray-based comparison of HER2, estrogen receptor, and progesterone receptor status in core biopsies and surgical specimens from FFPE breast cancer tissues.
Berg D; Langer R; Tran K; Walch A; Schuster T; Bronger H; Becker KF
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2011 Jul; 19(4):300-5. PubMed ID: 21293257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Profiling signalling pathways in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded breast cancer tissues reveals cross-talk between EGFR, HER2, HER3 and uPAR.
Berg D; Wolff C; Malinowsky K; Tran K; Walch A; Bronger H; Schuster T; Höfler H; Becker KF
J Cell Physiol; 2012 Jan; 227(1):204-12. PubMed ID: 21391216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Re-testing of predictive biomarkers on surgical breast cancer specimens is clinically relevant.
Robertson S; Rönnlund C; de Boniface J; Hartman J
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Apr; 174(3):795-805. PubMed ID: 30659433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative determination of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 mRNA in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue--a new option for predictive biomarker assessment in breast cancer.
Müller BM; Kronenwett R; Hennig G; Euting H; Weber K; Bohmann K; Weichert W; Altmann G; Roth C; Winzer KJ; Kristiansen G; Petry C; Dietel M; Denkert C
Diagn Mol Pathol; 2011 Mar; 20(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 21326033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical utility of reverse phase protein array for molecular classification of breast cancer.
Negm OH; Muftah AA; Aleskandarany MA; Hamed MR; Ahmad DA; Nolan CC; Diez-Rodriguez M; Tighe PJ; Ellis IO; Rakha EA; Green AR
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Jan; 155(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 26661092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Expression of wild-type estrogen receptor beta protein in human breast cancer: specific correlation with HER2/neu overexpression.
Umekita Y; Souda M; Ohi Y; Sagara Y; Rai Y; Takahama T; Yoshida H
Pathol Int; 2006 Aug; 56(8):423-7. PubMed ID: 16872435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hormone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status evaluation on ThinPrep specimens from breast carcinoma: correlation with histologic sections determination.
Pegolo E; Machin P; Riosa F; Bassini A; Deroma L; Di Loreto C
Cancer Cytopathol; 2012 Jun; 120(3):196-205. PubMed ID: 22298467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 Testing in Breast Cancer: Assessing the Value of Repeated Centralized Testing in Excision Specimens.
Hariri N; Hasteh F; Walavalkar V; Roma AA; Fadare O
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2019 Jan; 27(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 28549033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Technical validation of an RT-qPCR in vitro diagnostic test system for the determination of breast cancer molecular subtypes by quantification of ERBB2, ESR1, PGR and MKI67 mRNA levels from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast tumor specimens.
Laible M; Schlombs K; Kaiser K; Veltrup E; Herlein S; Lakis S; Stöhr R; Eidt S; Hartmann A; Wirtz RM; Sahin U
BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():398. PubMed ID: 27389414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Concordance between core needle biopsy and surgical specimen for oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status in breast cancer.
Asogan AB; Hong GS; Arni Prabhakaran SK
Singapore Med J; 2017 Mar; 58(3):145-149. PubMed ID: 27029805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Immunohistochemical detection of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 in formalin-fixed breast carcinoma cell block preparations: correlation of results to corresponding tissue block (needle core and excision) samples.
Kinsella MD; Birdsong GG; Siddiqui MT; Cohen C; Hanley KZ
Diagn Cytopathol; 2013 Mar; 41(3):192-8. PubMed ID: 22611048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 status between core needle and open excision biopsy in breast cancer: a meta-analysis.
Chen X; Yuan Y; Gu Z; Shen K
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Aug; 134(3):957-67. PubMed ID: 22370627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of central laboratory assessments of ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 by IHC/FISH and the corresponding mRNAs (ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and MKi67) by RT-qPCR on an automated, broadly deployed diagnostic platform.
Wu NC; Wong W; Ho KE; Chu VC; Rizo A; Davenport S; Kelly D; Makar R; Jassem J; Duchnowska R; Biernat W; Radecka B; Fujita T; Klein JL; Stonecypher M; Ohta S; Juhl H; Weidler JM; Bates M; Press MF
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Nov; 172(2):327-338. PubMed ID: 30120700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical relevance of DNA microarray analyses using archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast cancer specimens.
Sadi AM; Wang DY; Youngson BJ; Miller N; Boerner S; Done SJ; Leong WL
BMC Cancer; 2011 Jun; 11():253:1-13. PubMed ID: 21679412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estrogen receptor positive operable breast cancer: does menopausal status impact on HER2 and progesterone receptor status?
Wang N; Wang B; Wang Y; Hu J
Breast; 2011 Dec; 20(6):519-24. PubMed ID: 21700456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast fine needle aspiration continues to be relevant in a large academic medical center: experience from Massachusetts General Hospital.
Dong J; Ly A; Arpin R; Ahmed Q; Brachtel E
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Jul; 158(2):297-305. PubMed ID: 27383478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of core needle biopsy (CNB) and surgical specimens for accurate preoperative evaluation of ER, PgR and HER2 status of breast cancer patients.
Tamaki K; Sasano H; Ishida T; Miyashita M; Takeda M; Amari M; Tamaki N; Ohuchi N
Cancer Sci; 2010 Sep; 101(9):2074-9. PubMed ID: 20557310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High Ki-67 Expression and Low Progesterone Receptor Expression Could Independently Lead to a Worse Prognosis for Postmenopausal Patients With Estrogen Receptor-Positive and HER2-Negative Breast Cancer.
Nishimukai A; Yagi T; Yanai A; Miyagawa Y; Enomoto Y; Murase K; Imamura M; Takatsuka Y; Sakita I; Hatada T; Miyoshi Y
Clin Breast Cancer; 2015 Jun; 15(3):204-11. PubMed ID: 25600243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intratumoral heterogeneity of immunohistochemical marker expression in breast carcinoma: a tissue microarray-based study.
Nassar A; Radhakrishnan A; Cabrero IA; Cotsonis GA; Cohen C
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2010 Oct; 18(5):433-41. PubMed ID: 20485156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gene expression profiles of breast cancer obtained from core cut biopsies before neoadjuvant docetaxel, adriamycin, and cyclophoshamide chemotherapy correlate with routine prognostic markers and could be used to identify predictive signatures.
Rody A; Karn T; Gätje R; Kourtis K; Minckwitz G; Loibl S; Munnes M; Ruckhäberle E; Holtrich U; Kaufmann M; Ahr A
Zentralbl Gynakol; 2006 Apr; 128(2):76-81. PubMed ID: 16673249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
