164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21295532)
1. A stochastic model of the processes in PCR based amplification of STR DNA in forensic applications.
Weusten J; Herbergs J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Jan; 6(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 21295532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Direct comparison of post-28-cycle PCR purification and modified capillary electrophoresis methods with the 34-cycle "low copy number" (LCN) method for analysis of trace forensic DNA samples.
Forster L; Thomson J; Kutranov S
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Sep; 2(4):318-28. PubMed ID: 19083842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Simplified low-copy-number DNA analysis by post-PCR purification.
Smith PJ; Ballantyne J
J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jul; 52(4):820-9. PubMed ID: 17553095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modeling forward stutter: toward increased objectivity in forensic DNA interpretation.
Bright JA; Buckleton JS; Taylor D; Fernando MA; Curran JM
Electrophoresis; 2014 Nov; 35(21-22):3152-7. PubMed ID: 25147083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of short tandem repeats (STRs) for forensic usage: performance testing of fluorescent multiplex STR systems and analysis of authentic and simulated forensic samples.
Moretti TR; Baumstark AL; Defenbaugh DA; Keys KM; Smerick JB; Budowle B
J Forensic Sci; 2001 May; 46(3):647-60. PubMed ID: 11373004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of an STR peak area model.
Cowell RG
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Jun; 3(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 19414168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterising the STR locus D6S1043 and examination of its effect on stutter rates.
Bright JA; Stevenson KE; Coble MD; Hill CR; Curran JM; Buckleton JS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jan; 8(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 24315584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimization and validation of a fast amplification protocol for AmpFlSTR® Profiler Plus® for rapid forensic human identification.
Laurin N; Frégeau C
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Jan; 6(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 21397581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Demonstration of rapid multiplex PCR amplification involving 16 genetic loci.
Vallone PM; Hill CR; Butler JM
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Dec; 3(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 19083866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Forensic genetic SNP typing of low-template DNA and highly degraded DNA from crime case samples.
Børsting C; Mogensen HS; Morling N
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 May; 7(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 23523365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of two 17 locus forensic identification STR kits-Applied Biosystems's AmpFℓSTR® NGMSElect™ and Promega's PowerPlex® ESI17 kits.
Tvedebrink T; Mogensen HS; Stene MC; Morling N
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Sep; 6(5):523-31. PubMed ID: 22266064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. TWGDAM validation of the AmpFISTR blue PCR amplification kit for forensic casework analysis.
Wallin JM; Buoncristiani MR; Lazaruk KD; Fildes N; Holt CL; Walsh PS
J Forensic Sci; 1998 Jul; 43(4):854-70. PubMed ID: 9670511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of the stochastic threshold, back- and forward stutter filters and low template techniques for NGM.
Westen AA; Grol LJ; Harteveld J; Matai AS; de Knijff P; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):708-15. PubMed ID: 22633964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Probabilistic expert systems for handling artifacts in complex DNA mixtures.
Cowell RG; Lauritzen SL; Mortera J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Jun; 5(3):202-9. PubMed ID: 20452303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reduction of stutter ratios in short tandem repeat loci typing of low copy number DNA samples.
Seo SB; Ge J; King JL; Budowle B
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jan; 8(1):213-8. PubMed ID: 24315611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characterising stutter in forensic STR multiplexes.
Brookes C; Bright JA; Harbison S; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Jan; 6(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 21388903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New stutter ratio distribution for DNA mixture interpretation based on a continuous model.
Manabe S; Hamano Y; Morimoto C; Kawai C; Fujimoto S; Tamaki K
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2016 Mar; 19():16-21. PubMed ID: 26980248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of a male-specific, 12-locus fluorescent short tandem repeat (STR) multiplex.
Krenke BE; Viculis L; Richard ML; Prinz M; Milne SC; Ladd C; Gross AM; Gornall T; Frappier JR; Eisenberg AJ; Barna C; Aranda XG; Adamowicz MS; Budowle B
Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Feb; 148(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 15607584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stochastic sampling effects in STR typing: Implications for analysis and interpretation.
Timken MD; Klein SB; Buoncristiani MR
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jul; 11():195-204. PubMed ID: 24799164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating forensic DNA profiles using peak heights, allowing for multiple donors, allelic dropout and stutters.
Puch-Solis R; Rodgers L; Mazumder A; Pope S; Evett I; Curran J; Balding D
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Sep; 7(5):555-63. PubMed ID: 23948327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
