187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21295982)
41. Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: incidence of recurrence in patients with invasive breast cancer.
Fersis N; Hoenig A; Relakis K; Pinis S; Wallwiener D
Breast; 2004 Dec; 13(6):488-93. PubMed ID: 15563856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Cancer recurrence involving a TRAM flap and abdominal donor site following mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: a case report.
Kobraei EM; Kenady DE; Rogers WB; Rinker BD
Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Jun; 68(6):559-61. PubMed ID: 21587038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Early experience of immediate reconstruction using autologous free dermal fat graft after breast conservational surgery.
Kijima Y; Yoshinaka H; Owaki T; Aikou T
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2007; 60(5):495-502. PubMed ID: 17399658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Outcome analysis of immediate and delayed conservative breast surgery reconstruction with mastopexy and reduction mammaplasty techniques.
Munhoz AM; Aldrighi CM; Montag E; Arruda E; Brasil JA; Filassi JR; Aldrighi JM; Gemperli R; Ferreira MC
Ann Plast Surg; 2011 Sep; 67(3):220-5. PubMed ID: 21301307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The oncological implications of immediate breast reconstruction.
Knottenbelt A; Spauwen PH; Wobbes T
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2004 Oct; 30(8):829-33. PubMed ID: 15336727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A prospective model of care for breast cancer rehabilitation: postoperative and postreconstructive issues.
McNeely ML; Binkley JM; Pusic AL; Campbell KL; Gabram S; Soballe PW
Cancer; 2012 Apr; 118(8 Suppl):2226-36. PubMed ID: 22488697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The efficacy of the surgical delay procedure in pedicle TRAM breast reconstruction.
Atisha D; Alderman AK; Janiga T; Singal B; Wilkins EG
Ann Plast Surg; 2009 Oct; 63(4):383-8. PubMed ID: 19770703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Impact of immediate reconstruction on the local recurrence of breast cancer after mastectomy.
Murphy RX; Wahhab S; Rovito PF; Harper G; Kimmel SR; Kleinman LC; Young MJ
Ann Plast Surg; 2003 Apr; 50(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 12671371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Autologous tissue immediate breast reconstruction: desired but oncologically safe?
Lewis RS; Kontos M
Int J Clin Pract; 2009 Nov; 63(11):1642-6. PubMed ID: 19832820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. [The place of skin-sparing mastectomy in oncoplastic breast surgery].
Mátrai Z; Gulyás G; Tóth L; Sávolt A; Kunos C; Pesthy P; Bartal A; Kásler M
Magy Onkol; 2011 Nov; 55(4):252-67. PubMed ID: 22128308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Immediate reconstruction with implants in women with invasive breast cancer does not affect oncological safety in a matched cohort study.
Eriksen C; Frisell J; Wickman M; Lidbrink E; Krawiec K; Sandelin K
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Jun; 127(2):439-46. PubMed ID: 21409394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Defining the role for autologous breast reconstruction after mastectomy: social and oncologic implications.
Rozen WM; Ashton MW; Taylor GI
Clin Breast Cancer; 2008 Apr; 8(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 18621609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Immediate breast reconstruction with the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap after skin-sparing mastectomy.
Gherardini G; Thomas R; Basoccu G; Zaccheddu R; Fortunato L; Cortino P; Evans GR; Matarasso A; D'Aiuto M; D'Aiuto G
Int Surg; 2001; 86(4):246-51. PubMed ID: 12056470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Breast cancer surgery: use of mammaplasty. Results. Series of 298 cases].
Staub G; Fitoussi A; Falcou MC; Salmon RJ
Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 2008 Apr; 53(2):124-34. PubMed ID: 17949880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [In situ carcinomas of the breast: clinical features and therapeutic strategies].
Attene F; Scognamillo F; Trignano E; Meloni GB; Rubino C; Trignano M
Ann Ital Chir; 2006; 77(1):3-10; discussion 10-2. PubMed ID: 16910353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. New concept for immediate breast reconstruction for invasive cancers: feasibility, oncological safety and esthetic outcome of post-neoadjuvant therapy immediate breast reconstruction versus delayed breast reconstruction: a prospective pilot study.
Giacalone PL; Rathat G; Daures JP; Benos P; Azria D; Rouleau C
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Jul; 122(2):439-51. PubMed ID: 20502959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Advances and surgical decision-making for breast reconstruction.
Kronowitz SJ; Kuerer HM
Cancer; 2006 Sep; 107(5):893-907. PubMed ID: 16862569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Oncological results of immediate breast reconstruction: long term follow-up of a large series at a single institution.
Petit JY; Gentilini O; Rotmensz N; Rey P; Rietjens M; Garusi C; Botteri E; De Lorenzi F; Martella S; Bosco R; Khuthaila DK; Luini A
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Dec; 112(3):545-9. PubMed ID: 18210199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Local recurrence of breast cancer after skin-sparing mastectomy following core needle biopsy: case reports and review of the literature.
Uriburu JL; Vuoto HD; Cogorno L; Isetta JA; Candas G; Imach GC; Bernabo OL
Breast J; 2006; 12(3):194-8. PubMed ID: 16684314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Central quadrantectomy with resection of the nipple-areola complex compared with mastectomy in patients with retroareolar breast cancer.
Wagner E; Schrenk P; Huemer GM; Sir A; Schreiner M; Wayand W
Breast J; 2007; 13(6):557-63. PubMed ID: 17983395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
