BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21296548)

  • 1. A biomechanical evaluation of press-fit stem constructs for tumor endoprosthetic reconstruction of the distal femur.
    Ferguson PC; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Deheshi BM; Bell RS; Wunder JS
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1373-9. PubMed ID: 21296548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of distal stem geometry on interface motion in uncemented revision total hip prostheses.
    Kirk KL; Potter BK; Lehman RA; Xenos JS
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2007 Oct; 36(10):545-9. PubMed ID: 18033566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mechanical characteristics of proximal femoral reconstruction after 50% resection.
    Markel MD; Gottsauner-Wolf F; Rock MG; Frassica FJ; Chao EY
    J Orthop Res; 1993 May; 11(3):339-49. PubMed ID: 8326440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modular uncemented prosthetic reconstruction after resection of tumours of the distal femur.
    Capanna R; Morris HG; Campanacci D; Del Ben M; Campanacci M
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1994 Mar; 76(2):178-86. PubMed ID: 8113272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Primary stability of a robodoc implanted anatomical stem versus manual implantation.
    Nogler M; Polikeit A; Wimmer C; Brückner A; Ferguson SJ; Krismer M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Feb; 19(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 14967574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reaming technique of the femoral diaphysis in cementless total hip arthroplasty.
    Otani T; Whiteside LA; White SE; McCarthy DS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Feb; (311):210-21. PubMed ID: 7634578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Failure of cementless fixation of the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty.
    Otani T; Whiteside LA
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1992 Apr; 23(2):335-46. PubMed ID: 1570145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Torsional stability of uncemented femoral stems in oncologic reconstructions.
    Scharschmidt T; Cohen A; Thomas N; Ching R; Conrad E
    Orthopedics; 2011 Jan; 34(2):96. PubMed ID: 21323288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Uncemented, curved, short endoprosthesis stem for distal femoral reconstruction: early follow-up outcomes.
    Lu M; Wang J; Xiao C; Tang F; Min L; Zhou Y; Zhang W; Tu C
    World J Surg Oncol; 2018 Sep; 16(1):183. PubMed ID: 30200979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bending stiffness, torsional stability, and insertion force of cementless femoral stems.
    Incavo SJ; Johnson CC; Churchill DL; Beynnon BD
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2001 Apr; 30(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 11334454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem.
    Mumme T; Müller-Rath R; Andereya S; Wirtz DC
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):56-77. PubMed ID: 17345027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanical evaluation of six types of reconstruction following 25, 50, and 75% resection of the proximal femur.
    Kohles SS; Markel MD; Rock MG; Chao EY; Vanderby R
    J Orthop Res; 1994 Nov; 12(6):834-43. PubMed ID: 7983559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Closeness of fit of uncemented stems improves the strain distribution in the femur.
    Hua J; Walker PS
    J Orthop Res; 1995 May; 13(3):339-46. PubMed ID: 7602395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A biomechanical comparison of four different cementless press-fit stems used in revision surgery for total knee replacements.
    Zdero R; Saidi K; Mason SA; Schemitsch EH; Naudie DD
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2012 Nov; 226(11):848-57. PubMed ID: 23185955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Endoprosthetic bone reconstruction following malignant tumor resection in skeletally immature patients.
    Ward WG; Yang R-S ; Eckardt JJ
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1996 Jul; 27(3):493-502. PubMed ID: 8649732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modified transfemoral approach to revision arthroplasty with uncemented modular revision stems.
    Fink B; Grossmann A
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):32-55. PubMed ID: 17345026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical comparison of newly designed stemless prosthesis and conventional hip prosthesis--an experimental study.
    Tai CL; Lee MS; Chen WP; Hsieh PH; Lee PC; Shih CH
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2005; 15(3):239-49. PubMed ID: 15912004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of cortical strain after cemented and press-fit proximal and distal femoral replacement.
    Hua J; Walker PS
    J Orthop Res; 1992 Sep; 10(5):739-44. PubMed ID: 1500986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of femoral prosthesis design on cement strain in cemented total hip arthroplasty.
    Peters CL; Bachus KN; Craig MA; Higginbotham TO
    J Arthroplasty; 2001 Feb; 16(2):216-24. PubMed ID: 11222897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.