These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21296623)

  • 1. The overshoot phenomenon as a function of internal resistance in microbial fuel cells.
    Winfield J; Ieropoulos I; Greenman J; Dennis J
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2011 Apr; 81(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 21296623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of microbial fuel cell in response to change in sludge loading rate at different anodic feed pH.
    Behera M; Ghangrekar MM
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Nov; 100(21):5114-21. PubMed ID: 19539466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Controlling the occurrence of power overshoot by adapting microbial fuel cells to high anode potentials.
    Zhu X; Tokash JC; Hong Y; Logan BE
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2013 Apr; 90():30-5. PubMed ID: 23178374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adaptation to high current using low external resistances eliminates power overshoot in microbial fuel cells.
    Hong Y; Call DF; Werner CM; Logan BE
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2011 Oct; 28(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 21831626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microbial fuel cells: the effects of configurations, electrolyte solutions, and electrode materials on power generation.
    Li F; Sharma Y; Lei Y; Li B; Zhou Q
    Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2010 Jan; 160(1):168-81. PubMed ID: 19172235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of hydrolysis and fermentation rates in microbial fuel cells.
    Velasquez-Orta SB; Yu E; Katuri KP; Head IM; Curtis TP; Scott K
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2011 Apr; 90(2):789-98. PubMed ID: 21347728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improved energy output levels from small-scale Microbial Fuel Cells.
    Ieropoulos I; Greenman J; Melhuish C
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2010 Apr; 78(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 19540172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrocatalytic activity of anodic biofilm responses to pH changes in microbial fuel cells.
    Yuan Y; Zhao B; Zhou S; Zhong S; Zhuang L
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jul; 102(13):6887-91. PubMed ID: 21530241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of initial biofilm growth on the anode impedance of microbial fuel cells.
    Ramasamy RP; Ren Z; Mench MM; Regan JM
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2008 Sep; 101(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 18646217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of flow-rate, inoculum and time on the internal resistance of microbial fuel cells.
    Ieropoulos I; Winfield J; Greenman J
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 May; 101(10):3520-5. PubMed ID: 20100658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigating the effects of fluidic connection between microbial fuel cells.
    Winfield J; Ieropoulos I; Greenman J; Dennis J
    Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2011 May; 34(4):477-84. PubMed ID: 21136085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Power overshoot in two-chambered microbial fuel cell (MFC).
    Nien PC; Lee CY; Ho KC; Adav SS; Liu L; Wang A; Ren N; Lee DJ
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 Apr; 102(7):4742-6. PubMed ID: 21295969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is resistance futile? Changing external resistance does not improve microbial fuel cell performance.
    Lyon DY; Buret F; Vogel TM; Monier JM
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2010 Apr; 78(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 19783225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of external resistance on bacterial diversity and metabolism in cellulose-fed microbial fuel cells.
    Rismani-Yazdi H; Christy AD; Carver SM; Yu Z; Dehority BA; Tuovinen OH
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jan; 102(1):278-83. PubMed ID: 20627719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A novel configuration of microbial fuel cell stack bridged internally through an extra cation exchange membrane.
    Liu Z; Liu J; Zhang S; Su Z
    Biotechnol Lett; 2008 Jun; 30(6):1017-23. PubMed ID: 18259873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Proton exchange membrane and electrode surface areas as factors that affect power generation in microbial fuel cells.
    Oh SE; Logan BE
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2006 Mar; 70(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 16167143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of electrolyte pH on the rate of the anodic and cathodic reactions in an air-cathode microbial fuel cell.
    He Z; Huang Y; Manohar AK; Mansfeld F
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2008 Nov; 74(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 18774345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enhanced performance of air-cathode two-chamber microbial fuel cells with high-pH anode and low-pH cathode.
    Zhuang L; Zhou S; Li Y; Yuan Y
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 May; 101(10):3514-9. PubMed ID: 20093009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Graphite anode surface modification with controlled reduction of specific aryl diazonium salts for improved microbial fuel cells power output.
    Picot M; Lapinsonnière L; Rothballer M; Barrière F
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2011 Oct; 28(1):181-8. PubMed ID: 21803564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of microbial fuel cells with and without Nafion solution as cathode binding agent.
    Huang Y; He Z; Mansfeld F
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2010 Oct; 79(2):261-4. PubMed ID: 20478750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.