These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21296771)

  • 41. Electronic neutron personal dosemeters: their performance in mixed radiation fields in nuclear power plants.
    Luszik-Bhadra M; Bartlett D; Boschung M; Coeck M; Curzio G; Derdau D; d'Errico F; Fiechtner A; Itié C; Kyllönen JE; Lacoste V; Lahaye T; Lindborg L; Molinos C; Reginatto M; Schuhmacher H; Tanner R; Vanhavere F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):378-82. PubMed ID: 16644993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of two extremity dosemeters based on LiF:Mg,Cu,P thin detectors for mixed beta-gamma fields.
    Ginjaume M; Pérez S; Ortega X; Duch MA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):316-20. PubMed ID: 16644980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The right choice: extremity dosemeter for different radiation fields.
    Brasik N; Stadtmann H; Kindl P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):331-4. PubMed ID: 17711869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. An estimate of the propagated uncertainty for a dosemeter algorithm used for personnel monitoring.
    Veinot KG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Mar; 163(4):409-14. PubMed ID: 25009187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Development of an algorithm for evaluating personal doses due to photon fields in terms of operational quantities for TLD badge system in India.
    Pradhan SM; Sneha C; Chourasiya G; Adtani MM; Tripathi SM; Singh SK
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Sep; 136(3):176-84. PubMed ID: 19755432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. ENVIRONMENTAL DOSIMETRY WITH THE BeOSL PERSONAL DOSEMETER.
    Jahn A; Sommer M; Henniger J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 170(1-4):346-9. PubMed ID: 27060113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Simulated and measured Hp(10) response of the personal dosemeter Seibersdorf.
    Hranitzky C; Stadtmann H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):166-9. PubMed ID: 17846027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A TLD-based personal dosemeter system for aircrew monitoring.
    Hajek M; Berger T; Vana N
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):337-41. PubMed ID: 15353670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Selection of the most appropriate two-dosemeter algorithm for estimating effective dose equivalent during maintenance periods in Korean nuclear power plants.
    Kim HG; Kong TY
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Jul; 140(2):171-81. PubMed ID: 20203124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A STUDY ON THE UNCERTAINTY FOR THE ROUTINE DOSIMETRY SERVICE AT THE LEBANESE ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION USING HARSHAW 8814 DOSEMETERS.
    Rizk C; Vanhavere F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 170(1-4):168-72. PubMed ID: 26443544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Occupational radiation exposure during removal of radioactive reactor components from GRR-1 pool.
    Kontogeorgakos D; Tzika F; Valakis S; Stamatelatos IE
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):632-5. PubMed ID: 21051436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. EDEL: ENEA DOSEMETER FOR EYE LENS.
    Ferrari P; Mariotti F; Campani L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 170(1-4):145-9. PubMed ID: 26170436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. On neutron-gamma mixed field dosimetry with LiF:Mg,Ti at radiation protection dose levels.
    Weinstein M; German U; Alfassi ZB
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):314-8. PubMed ID: 16735561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. On the reassessment of thermal neutron doses in TLD-100 by measuring the residual dose.
    Abraham A; Weinstein M; German U; Alfassi ZB
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 126(1-4):524-7. PubMed ID: 17507383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Calibration and testing of a TLD dosemeter for area monitoring.
    Buchillier T; Aroua A; Bochud F; Schuler C; Stritt N; Valley JF; Wernli C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):705-10. PubMed ID: 15353735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Development of a technique for improving coefficient of variation of CaSO4:Dy teflon-based TLD personnel monitoring system in low-dose region.
    Pradhan SM; Sneha C; Sahai MK; Chougaonkar MP; Babu DA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Dec; 167(4):429-36. PubMed ID: 25527179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The effects of the thermoluminescent dosimeter badge on the monitoring of low energy x-radiation.
    Worley RD
    Health Phys; 1982 Sep; 43(3):422-5. PubMed ID: 7174337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Performance of different thermoluminescence dosimeters in 90SR+90Y radiation fields.
    Oliveira ML; Caldas LV
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 15367762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Compact fluorescent lamp phosphors in accidental radiation monitoring.
    Murthy KV; Pallavi SP; Ghildiyal R; Parmar MC; Patel YS; Ravi Kumar V; Sai Prasad AS; Natarajan V; Page AG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):238-41. PubMed ID: 16816401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Hp(0.07) photon irradiations at Seibersdorf for the EURADOS extremity dosemeter intercomparison 2009.
    Stadtmann H; Hranitzky C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):306-9. PubMed ID: 21208935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.