256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21296856)
1. Shadow of doubt.
Shafer SL
Anesth Analg; 2011 Mar; 112(3):498-500. PubMed ID: 21296856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Special notice to readers and authors on scientific misconduct.
Miller DR
Can J Anaesth; 2009 Jun; 56(6):408-11. PubMed ID: 19330396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Under suspicion.
Nature; 2010 Apr; 464(7293):1245. PubMed ID: 20428116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The science of retraction.
Nat Neurosci; 2002 Dec; 5(12):1249. PubMed ID: 12447375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Standards for ethical publication.
Johnson JT; Niparko JK; Levine PA; Kennedy DW; Weber P; Weber RS; Benninger MS; Rosenfeld RM; Ruben RJ; Smith RJ; Sataloff RT; Weir N
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Dec; 70(12):2017-8. PubMed ID: 17045345
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Coping with scientific misconduct.
Wager E
BMJ; 2011 Oct; 343():d6586. PubMed ID: 22016451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Anaesthetics journals retract further articles after ethics approval is found lacking.
Torjesen I
BMJ; 2012 Mar; 344():e2019. PubMed ID: 22415958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Scientific misconduct. Cleaning up the paper trail.
Couzin J; Unger K
Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5770):38-43. PubMed ID: 16601164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Publication ethics.
Hays JC
Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 19386055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Falsification, fabrication, and plagiarism: the unholy trinity of scientific writing.
Zietman AL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Oct; 87(2):225-7. PubMed ID: 23958142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?
Steen RG
J Med Ethics; 2011 Feb; 37(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 21081306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retractions: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Wager E; Barbour V; Yentis S; Kleinert S;
Obes Rev; 2010 Jan; 11(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 20653849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Standards for ethical publication.
Johnson JT; Niparko JK; Levine PA; Kennedy DW; Rudy SF; Weber P; Weber RS; Benninger MS; Rosenfeld RM; Ruben RJ; Smith RJ; Sataloff RT; Weir N
Am J Otolaryngol; 2007; 28(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 17162121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Update to readers and authors on ethical and scientific misconduct: retraction of the "Boldt articles".
Miller DR
Can J Anaesth; 2011 Sep; 58(9):777-9, 779-81. PubMed ID: 21800211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Science publishing: The trouble with retractions.
Van Noorden R
Nature; 2011 Oct; 478(7367):26-8. PubMed ID: 21979026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Retractions: trends, implications, and possible further steps.
Giglia E; Pescarmona GP
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2012 Jun; 48(2):339-43. PubMed ID: 22614895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Gel slicing and dicing: a recipe for disaster.
Nat Cell Biol; 2004 Apr; 6(4):275. PubMed ID: 15057234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Standards for ethical publication.
Johnson JT; Niparko JK; Levine PA; Kennedy DW; Weber P; Weber RS; Benninger MS; Rosenfeld RM; Ruben RJ; Smith RJ; Sataloff RT; Weir N
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Dec; 27(8):1049-50. PubMed ID: 17130794
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Author misconduct: What journal editors do when they suspect and find it?
Yadav S; De D
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2013; 79(4):453-6. PubMed ID: 23760314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?
Steen RG
J Med Ethics; 2011 Apr; 37(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 21186208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
