These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21297062)

  • 21. Contribution of genetic influences to animal-to-animal variation in myoglobin content and beef lean color stability.
    King DA; Shackelford SD; Kuehn LA; Kemp CM; Rodriguez AB; Thallman RM; Wheeler TL
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Mar; 88(3):1160-7. PubMed ID: 19966159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Selection of single-nucleotide polymorphisms and quality of genotypes used in genomic evaluation of dairy cattle in the United States and Canada.
    Wiggans GR; Sonstegard TS; VanRaden PM; Matukumalli LK; Schnabel RD; Taylor JF; Schenkel FS; Van Tassell CP
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Jul; 92(7):3431-6. PubMed ID: 19528621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Development and validation of a small SNP panel for feed efficiency in beef cattle.
    Abo-Ismail MK; Lansink N; Akanno E; Karisa BK; Crowley JJ; Moore SS; Bork E; Stothard P; Basarab JA; Plastow GS
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Mar; 96(2):375-397. PubMed ID: 29390120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of ractopamine hydrochloride on performance, rate and variation in feed intake, and acid-base balance in feedlot cattle.
    Abney CS; Vasconcelos JT; McMeniman JP; Keyser SA; Wilson KR; Vogel GJ; Galyean ML
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Nov; 85(11):3090-8. PubMed ID: 17609477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Genetic variance and covariance and breed differences for feed intake and average daily gain to improve feed efficiency in growing cattle.
    Retallick KJ; Bormann JM; Weaber RL; MacNeil MD; Bradford HL; Freetly HC; Hales KE; Moser DW; Snelling WM; Thallman RM; Kuehn LA
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1444-1450. PubMed ID: 28464090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Identification of polymorphisms influencing feed intake and efficiency in beef cattle.
    Sherman EL; Nkrumah JD; Murdoch BM; Moore SS
    Anim Genet; 2008 Jun; 39(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 18318789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accuracy of direct genomic values derived from imputed single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes in Jersey cattle.
    Weigel KA; de Los Campos G; Vazquez AI; Rosa GJ; Gianola D; Van Tassell CP
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Nov; 93(11):5423-35. PubMed ID: 20965358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Growth and pubertal development of F1 bulls from Hereford, Angus, Norwegian Red, Swedish Red and White, Friesian, and Wagyu sires.
    Casas E; Lunstra DD; Cundiff LV; Ford JJ
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Nov; 85(11):2904-9. PubMed ID: 17591712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of the effect of alternative measurements of body weight gain and dry matter intake for the calculation of residual feed intake in growing purebred Charolais and Red Angus cattle.
    Kayser W; Glaze JB; Welch CM; Kerley M; Hill RA
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Jul; 93(7):3675-81. PubMed ID: 26440033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Association of a single nucleotide polymorphism in SPP1 with growth traits and twinning in a cattle population selected for twinning rate.
    Allan MF; Thallman RM; Cushman RA; Echternkamp SE; White SN; Kuehn LA; Casas E; Smith TP
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Feb; 85(2):341-7. PubMed ID: 17040953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A genome scan for quantitative trait loci influencing carcass, post-natal growth and reproductive traits in commercial Angus cattle.
    McClure MC; Morsci NS; Schnabel RD; Kim JW; Yao P; Rolf MM; McKay SD; Gregg SJ; Chapple RH; Northcutt SL; Taylor JF
    Anim Genet; 2010 Dec; 41(6):597-607. PubMed ID: 20477797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Relationships among performance, residual feed intake, and product quality of progeny from Red Angus sires divergent for maintenance energy EPD.
    Welch CM; Ahola JK; Hall JB; Murdoch GK; Crews DH; Davis LC; Doumit ME; Price WJ; Keenan LD; Hill RA
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(13):5107-17. PubMed ID: 22871930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Growth, carcass quality, and protein and energy metabolism in beef cattle with different growth potentials and residual feed intakes.
    Castro Bulle FC; Paulino PV; Sanches AC; Sainz RD
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Apr; 85(4):928-36. PubMed ID: 17178805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. DNA-based paternity analysis and genetic evaluation in a large, commercial cattle ranch setting.
    Van Eenennaam AL; Weaber RL; Drake DJ; Penedo MC; Quaas RL; Garrick DJ; Pollak EJ
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Dec; 85(12):3159-69. PubMed ID: 17878282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Estimated gene frequencies of GeneSTAR markers and their size of effects on meat tenderness, marbling, and feed efficiency in temperate and tropical beef cattle breeds across a range of production systems.
    Johnston DJ; Graser HU
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Jun; 88(6):1917-35. PubMed ID: 20154168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Genome-wide association studies for feedlot and growth traits in cattle.
    Bolormaa S; Hayes BJ; Savin K; Hawken R; Barendse W; Arthur PF; Herd RM; Goddard ME
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Jun; 89(6):1684-97. PubMed ID: 21239664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Genetic evaluation of growth in a multibreed beef cattle population using random regression-linear spline models.
    Sánchez JP; Misztal I; Aguilar I; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Feb; 86(2):267-77. PubMed ID: 17965329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of feed conversion in steers from a diallel of Simmental, Limousin, Polled Hereford, and Brahman beef cattle.
    Comerford JW; Cooper JB; Benyshek LL; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Jul; 69(7):2770-8. PubMed ID: 1885389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fine mapping quantitative trait loci for feed intake and feed efficiency in beef cattle.
    Sherman EL; Nkrumah JD; Li C; Bartusiak R; Murdoch B; Moore SS
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Jan; 87(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 18791150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Multiple-trait genomic evaluation of linear type traits using genomic and phenotypic data in US Holsteins.
    Tsuruta S; Misztal I; Aguilar I; Lawlor TJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Aug; 94(8):4198-204. PubMed ID: 21787955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.