279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21298404)
1. Super-resolution variable-dose imaging in digital radiography: quality and dose reduction with a fluoroscopic flat-panel detector.
Berliner L; Buffa A
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2011 Sep; 6(5):663-73. PubMed ID: 21298404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography at different exposure doses versus mammography film: possibility of radiation dose reduction in detecting rheumatologic bone defects.
Zähringer M; Reineck S; Perniok A; Krüger K; Andermahr J; Rubbert A; Winnekendonk G
Acta Radiol; 2008 Mar; 49(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 18300139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Flat-detector computed tomography (FD-CT).
Kalender WA; Kyriakou Y
Eur Radiol; 2007 Nov; 17(11):2767-79. PubMed ID: 17587058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of image quality and radiation dose between an image-intensifier system and a newer-generation flat-panel detector system — technical phantom measurements and evaluation of clinical imaging in children.
Weis M; Hagelstein C; Diehm T; Schoenberg SO; Neff KW
Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Feb; 46(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 26481334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. New developed DR detector performs radiographs of hand, pelvic and premature chest anatomies at a lower radiation dose and/or a higher image quality.
Precht H; Tingberg A; Waaler D; Outzen CB
J Digit Imaging; 2014 Feb; 27(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 24221693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Reduction method of patients' radiation dose considering the size of field of view with a digital cine X-ray system loading a flat-panel detector].
Kato M; Chida K; Yoshida K; Sasaki F; Sasaki M; Oosaka H; Tosa T
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(11):1443-7. PubMed ID: 22104237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiation dose and image quality in diagnostic radiology. Optimization of the dose-image quality relationship with clinical experience from scoliosis radiography, coronary intervention and a flat-panel digital detector.
Geijer H
Acta Radiol Suppl; 2002 Mar; 43(427):1-43. PubMed ID: 12108231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Chest radiography with a flat-panel detector: image quality with dose reduction after copper filtration.
Hamer OW; Sirlin CB; Strotzer M; Borisch I; Zorger N; Feuerbach S; Völk M
Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):691-700. PubMed ID: 16192324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A real-time flat-panel X-ray pixel imaging system for low-dose medical diagnostics and craniofacial applications.
Chapuy S; Dimcovski D; Dimcovski Z; Grigoriev E; Grob E; Ligier Y; Pachoud M; Riondel F; Rüfenacht D; Sayegh C; Terrier F; Valley JF; Verdun FR
J Craniofac Surg; 2000 Jan; 11(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 11314093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Flat panel digital radiography compared with storage phosphor computed radiography: assessment of dose versus image quality in phantom studies.
Fischbach F; Ricke J; Freund T; Werk M; Spors B; Baumann C; Pech MJ; Felix R
Invest Radiol; 2002 Nov; 37(11):609-14. PubMed ID: 12393973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Flat-panel detectors in X-ray systems].
Spahn M; Heer V; Freytag R
Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):340-50. PubMed ID: 12764582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reducing the radiation dose during excretory urography: flat-panel silicon x-ray detector versus computed radiography.
Zähringer M; Hesselmann V; Schulte O; Kamm KF; Braun W; Haupt G; Krug B; Lackner K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):931-7. PubMed ID: 14500204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Image quality and exposure dose in digital projection radiography].
Busch HP; Busch S; Decker C; Schilz C
Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 12525978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Simulated bone erosions in a hand phantom: detection with conventional screen-film technology versus cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector.
Strotzer M; Völk M; Wild T; von Landenberg P; Feuerbach S
Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):512-5. PubMed ID: 10796933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Technical advances of interventional fluoroscopy and flat panel image receptor.
Lin PJ
Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 18849699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Projection X-ray Imaging: Radiography, Mammography, Fluoroscopy.
Seibert JA
Health Phys; 2019 Feb; 116(2):148-156. PubMed ID: 30585956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical application of a flat-panel X-ray detector based on amorphous silicon technology: image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction in skeletal radiography.
Strotzer M; Gmeinwieser J; Völk M; Fründ R; Seitz J; Manke C; Albrich H; Feuerbach S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 9648757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality control phantom for flat panel detector X-ray systems.
Chida K; Kaga Y; Haga Y; Takeda K; Zuguchi M
Health Phys; 2013 Jan; 104(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 23192093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative evaluation of an II based and a flat panel based cardiovascular fluoroscopy system within a clinical environment.
Grewal RK; McLean ID
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2005 Sep; 28(3):151-8. PubMed ID: 16250468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
