BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21298598)

  • 1. [Perceptual and acoustic evaluation of hoarseness].
    Hanschmann H; Berger R
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2011 Feb; 90(2):68-70. PubMed ID: 21298598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The Evaluation of Voice Quality via Signal Typing in Voice using Narrowband Spectrograms].
    Barsties B; Hoffmann U; Maryn Y
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2016 Feb; 95(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 26468672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual structure of adductor spasmodic dysphonia and its acoustic correlates.
    Cannito MP; Doiuchi M; Murry T; Woodson GE
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):818.e5-13. PubMed ID: 23177751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Psychoacoustic scaling of acoustic voice parameters by multicenter voice ratings].
    Schönweiler R; Wübbelt P; Hess M; Ptok M
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2001 Mar; 80(3):117-22. PubMed ID: 11320872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Characteristics of the voice in patients with glottic carcinoma evaluated with the RBH (Roughness, Breathiness, Hoarseness) and GIRBAS (Grade, Instability, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain) scales].
    Mitrović S
    Med Pregl; 2003; 56(7-8):337-40. PubMed ID: 14587250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automatic Evaluation of Voice Quality Using Text-Based Laryngograph Measurements and Prosodic Analysis.
    Haderlein T; Schwemmle C; Döllinger M; Matoušek V; Ptok M; Nöth E
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():316325. PubMed ID: 26136813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Subjective acoustic analysis of dysphonia caused by tumor using the RBH (roughness, breathiness, hoarseness) scale].
    Mitrović S
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2003; 131(1-2):40-2. PubMed ID: 14608861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of irregular voices after total and laser surgical partial laryngectomy.
    Olthoff A; Mrugalla S; Laskawi R; Fröhlich M; Stuermer I; Kruse E; Ambrosch P; Steiner W
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2003 Sep; 129(9):994-9. PubMed ID: 12975275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vocal Characteristics of Elderly Women Engaged in Aerobics in Private Institutions of Salvador, Bahia.
    Colman Machado de Machado F; Cielo CA; Lessa MM; Barbosa LH
    J Voice; 2016 Jan; 30(1):127.e9-19. PubMed ID: 25795360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of visible speech in the perceptual rating of pathological voices.
    Martens JW; Versnel H; Dejonckere PH
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Feb; 133(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 17309988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [On the auditory evaluation of voice quality].
    Ptok M; Schwemmle C; Iven C; Jessen M; Nawka T
    HNO; 2006 Oct; 54(10):793-802. PubMed ID: 16132879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Use of narrow-band spectrogram in voice surgery].
    Núñez Batalla F; Suárez Nieto C; Maldonado Fernández M; Baragaño Río L; Muñoz Pinto C
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2000 Apr; 51(3):243-5. PubMed ID: 10867400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation among the dysphonia severity index (DSI), the RBH voice perceptual evaluation, and minimum glottal area in female patients with vocal fold nodules.
    Hussein Gaber AG; Liang FY; Yang JS; Wang YJ; Zheng YQ
    J Voice; 2014 Jan; 28(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 24275460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Integrating voice evaluation: correlation between acoustic and audio-perceptual measures.
    Vaz Freitas S; Melo Pestana P; Almeida V; Ferreira A
    J Voice; 2015 May; 29(3):390.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25619471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Hoarseness].
    Müller R
    Ther Umsch; 1995 Nov; 52(11):759-62. PubMed ID: 7502253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differentiated perceptual evaluation of pathological voice quality: reliability and correlations with acoustic measurements.
    Dejonckere PH; Remacle M; Fresnel-Elbaz E; Woisard V; Crevier-Buchman L; Millet B
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1996; 117(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 9102729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pathological likelihood index as a measurement of the degree of voice normality and perceived hoarseness.
    Godino-Llorente JI; Gómez-Vilda P; Cruz-Roldán F; Blanco-Velasco M; Fraile R
    J Voice; 2010 Nov; 24(6):667-77. PubMed ID: 20207107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multidimensional voice analysis of reflux laryngitis patients.
    Pribuisienë R; Uloza V; Saferis V
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Jan; 262(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 15004705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Perceptive and instrumental examination of voice quality in patients with lip-jaw-palate clefts].
    Bressmann T; Sader R; Merk M; Ziegler W; Busch R; Zeilhofer HF; Horch HH
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Dec; 77(12):700-8. PubMed ID: 10036673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Towards objective evaluation of perceived roughness and breathiness: an approach based on mel-frequency cepstral analysis.
    Sáenz-Lechón N; Fraile R; Godino-Llorente JI; Fernández-Baíllo R; Osma-Ruiz V; Gutiérrez-Arriola JM; Arias-Londoño JD
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Jul; 36(2):52-9. PubMed ID: 20849245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.