These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2129919)

  • 1. A scanning electron microscope (SEM) study of the smear layer in root canals.
    Tanboğa I; Kuraner T
    J Marmara Univ Dent Fac; 1990 Sep; 1(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 2129919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An ultrastructural study of the smear layer: comparative aspects using secondary electron image and backscattered electron image.
    Dautel-Morazin A; Vulcain JM; Bonnaure-Mallet M
    J Endod; 1994 Nov; 20(11):531-4. PubMed ID: 7643035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Smear layer removal with different concentrations of EDTA-ethylenediamine mixtures.
    Aktener BO; Bilkay U
    J Endod; 1993 May; 19(5):228-31. PubMed ID: 8360598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis.
    Teixeira CS; Felippe MC; Felippe WT
    Int Endod J; 2005 May; 38(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15876291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ultrastructural morphologic evaluation of root canal walls prepared by two rotary nickel-titanium systems: a comparative study.
    Sabet NE; Lutfy RA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Sep; 106(3):e59-66. PubMed ID: 18602300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new solution for the removal of the smear layer.
    Torabinejad M; Khademi AA; Babagoli J; Cho Y; Johnson WB; Bozhilov K; Kim J; Shabahang S
    J Endod; 2003 Mar; 29(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12669874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of the effectiveness of the F-file versus ultrasonic activation of a K-file to remove smear layer.
    Chopra S; Murray PE; Namerow KN
    J Endod; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1243-5. PubMed ID: 18793930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of precurving endosonic files on the amount of debris and smear layer remaining in curved root canals.
    Lumley PJ; Walmsley AD; Walton RE; Rippin JW
    J Endod; 1992 Dec; 18(12):616-9. PubMed ID: 1298802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of debris and smear layer remaining following use of ProTaper and Hero Shaper instruments in combination with NaOCl and EDTA irrigation.
    Yang G; Wu H; Zheng Y; Zhang H; Li H; Zhou X
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):e63-71. PubMed ID: 18701325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scanning electron microscopy study of the adhesion of Prevotella nigrescens to the dentin of prepared root canals.
    Yang SE; Bae KS
    J Endod; 2002 Jun; 28(6):433-7. PubMed ID: 12067123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of different endodontic procedures on dentin morphology of human teeth.
    Prati C; Selighini M; Ferrieri P; Mongiorgi R
    J Endod; 1994 Apr; 20(4):174-9. PubMed ID: 8035157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The smear layer in root canals as seen under scanning electron microscopy (I)].
    Zaimoğlu L
    Ankara Univ Hekim Fak Derg; 1985; 12(2):333-44. PubMed ID: 3870115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Smear layer production of K3 and ProFile Ni-Ti rotary instruments in curved root canals: a comparative SEM study.
    Kum KY; Kazemi RB; Cha BY; Zhu Q
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16545720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dentin wall adaptation of multiphase versus temperature thermoplasticized gutta-percha. A scanning electron microscopic study.
    Kataia MA; Seif RE; el-Sayed JM; Ezzat KM
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Apr; 41(2):1129-36. PubMed ID: 9497649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of various concentrations of sodium hypochlorite on the ability of MTAD to remove the smear layer.
    Torabinejad M; Cho Y; Khademi AA; Bakland LK; Shabahang S
    J Endod; 2003 Apr; 29(4):233-9. PubMed ID: 12701769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [A scanning electron microscope study comparing the cleansing effect of the irrigating solutions and irrigating systems].
    Kim DY; Choi GW
    Taehan Chikkwa Uisa Hyophoe Chi; 1990 Feb; 28(2):181-92. PubMed ID: 2130128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of German chamomile (Marticaria recutita L.) extract and tea tree (Melaleuca alternifolia L.) oil used as irrigants on removal of smear layer: a scanning electron microscopy study.
    Sadr Lahijani MS; Raoof Kateb HR; Heady R; Yazdani D
    Int Endod J; 2006 Mar; 39(3):190-5. PubMed ID: 16507072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Formation, composition, clinical implications and methods for removing the smeared layer from root canal walls].
    Spyropoulos GN; Kourteli AN
    Odontostomatol Proodos; 1989 Aug; 43(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 2518057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of different surface treatments on the push-out bond strength of fiber post to root canal dentin.
    Demiryürek EO; Külünk S; Saraç D; Yüksel G; Bulucu B
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):e74-80. PubMed ID: 19615650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An ex vivo evaluation of a new root canal irrigation technique with intracanal aspiration.
    Fukumoto Y; Kikuchi I; Yoshioka T; Kobayashi C; Suda H
    Int Endod J; 2006 Feb; 39(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 16454788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.