These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21299328)

  • 41. Retrieval orientation and the control of recollection.
    Herron JE; Rugg MD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):843-54. PubMed ID: 14511537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Prior task experience and comparable stimulus exposure nullify focal and nonfocal prospective memory retrieval differences.
    Hicks JL; Franks BA; Spitler SN
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Oct; 70(10):1997-2006. PubMed ID: 27461749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Heightened false memory: a long-term sequela of severe closed head injury.
    Ries M; Marks W
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(12):2233-40. PubMed ID: 16814819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Adult age differences in event-based prospective memory: a meta-analysis on the role of focal versus nonfocal cues.
    Kliegel M; Jäger T; Phillips LH
    Psychol Aging; 2008 Mar; 23(1):203-8. PubMed ID: 18361667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Amount of postcue encoding predicts amount of directed forgetting.
    Pastötter B; Bäuml KH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 20053044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Attentional capture by working memory contents.
    Pan Y
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Jun; 64(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 20565178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Electrophysiological correlates of proactive interference in the 'Recent Probes' verbal working memory task.
    Zhang JX; Wu R; Kong L; Weng X; Du Y
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2167-73. PubMed ID: 20398683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Material-specific neural correlates of memory retrieval.
    Yick YY; Wilding EL
    Neuroreport; 2008 Oct; 19(15):1463-7. PubMed ID: 18797298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Overt attention and predictiveness in human contingency learning.
    Le Pelley ME; Beesley T; Griffiths O
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Apr; 37(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 21319915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Event-related potential evidence that automatic recollection can be voluntarily avoided.
    Bergström ZM; de Fockert J; Richardson-Klavehn A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jul; 21(7):1280-301. PubMed ID: 18702575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Theoretical implications of extralist probes for directed forgetting.
    Sahakyan L; Goodmon LB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):920-37. PubMed ID: 20565210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Robust recollection rejection in the memory conjunction paradigm.
    Lampinen JM; Odegard TN; Neuschatz JS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):332-42. PubMed ID: 14979808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Why is test-restudy practice beneficial for memory? An evaluation of the mediator shift hypothesis.
    Pyc MA; Rawson KA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):737-46. PubMed ID: 22060276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Contribution of organizational strategy to verbal learning and memory in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    Roth RM; Wishart HA; Flashman LA; Riordan HJ; Huey L; Saykin AJ
    Neuropsychology; 2004 Jan; 18(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 14744190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Implicit and explicit memory processes in panic patients as reflected in behavioral and electrophysiological measures.
    Pauli P; Dengler W; Wiedemann G
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2005 Jun; 36(2):111-27. PubMed ID: 15814080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Neural mechanisms of attentional shifts due to irrelevant spatial and numerical cues.
    Ranzini M; Dehaene S; Piazza M; Hubbard EM
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2615-24. PubMed ID: 19465038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Attentional mechanisms in learned predictiveness.
    Mitchell CJ; Griffiths O; Seetoo J; Lovibond PF
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Apr; 38(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 22369199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Enhanced processing fluency leads to biases in source memory.
    Kurilla BP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Aug; 64(8):1609-31. PubMed ID: 21749224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Outcome value influences attentional biases in human associative learning: dissociable effects of training and instruction.
    Le Pelley ME; Mitchell CJ; Johnson AM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Jan; 39(1):39-55. PubMed ID: 23316975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Spontaneous prospective-memory processing: Unexpected fluency experiences trigger erroneous intention executions.
    Rummel J; Meiser T
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Jan; 44(1):89-103. PubMed ID: 26304843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.