These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21299332)

  • 1. Different confidence-accuracy relationships for feature-based and familiarity-based memories.
    Reinitz MT; Peria WJ; Séguin JA; Loftus GR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):507-15. PubMed ID: 21299332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conceptual priming and familiarity: different expressions of memory during recognition testing with distinct neurophysiological correlates.
    Voss JL; Lucas HD; Paller KA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Nov; 22(11):2638-51. PubMed ID: 19702474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Test sequence priming in recognition memory.
    Johns EE; Mewhort DJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1162-74. PubMed ID: 19686012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Encoding modality can affect memory accuracy via retrieval orientation.
    Pierce BH; Gallo DA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):516-21. PubMed ID: 21261425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of conceptual processing on familiarity-based recognition.
    Ngo CT; Brown A; Sargent J; Dopkins S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Mar; 64(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 20384421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Remember-Know and source memory instructions can qualitatively change old-new recognition accuracy: the modality-match effect in recognition memory.
    Mulligan NW; Besken M; Peterson D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):558-66. PubMed ID: 20192551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Examining the relationships among item recognition, source recognition, and recall from an individual differences perspective.
    Unsworth N; Brewer GA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1578-85. PubMed ID: 19857028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of study context on item recollection.
    Skinner EI; Fernandes MA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jul; 63(7):1318-34. PubMed ID: 19890765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ERP evidence for flexible adjustment of retrieval orientation and its influence on familiarity.
    Ecker UK; Zimmer HD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Oct; 21(10):1907-19. PubMed ID: 18823244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Picture recognition without picture identification: a method for assessing the role of perceptual information in familiarity-based picture recognition.
    Langley MM; Cleary AM; Kostic BN; Woods JA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 17434434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Processes leading to confidence and accuracy in sentence recognition: a metamemory approach.
    Brewer WF; Sampaio C
    Memory; 2006 Jul; 14(5):540-52. PubMed ID: 16754240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dissociating positive and negative influences of verbal processing on the recognition of pictures of faces and objects.
    Nakabayashi K; Burton AM; Brandimonte MA; Lloyd-Jones TJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):376-90. PubMed ID: 21988409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intra- and inter-item associations doubly dissociate the electrophysiological correlates of familiarity and recollection.
    Jäger T; Mecklinger A; Kipp KH
    Neuron; 2006 Nov; 52(3):535-45. PubMed ID: 17088218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Process dissociation between contextual retrieval and item recognition.
    Weis S; Specht K; Klaver P; Tendolkar I; Willmes K; Ruhlmann J; Elger CE; Fernández G
    Neuroreport; 2004 Dec; 15(18):2729-33. PubMed ID: 15597043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hippocampal involvement in recollection but not familiarity across time: a prospective study.
    Suchan B; Gayk AE; Schmid G; Köster O; Daum I
    Hippocampus; 2008; 18(1):92-8. PubMed ID: 17932973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The bilateral field advantage in a sequential face-name matching task with famous and nonfamous faces.
    Collin CA; Byrne S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Mar; 64(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 20384415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distinct brain networks in recognition memory share a defined region in the precuneus.
    Dörfel D; Werner A; Schaefer M; von Kummer R; Karl A
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Nov; 30(10):1947-59. PubMed ID: 19895564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. fMRI evidence for separable and lateralized prefrontal memory monitoring processes.
    Dobbins IG; Simons JS; Schacter DL
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(6):908-20. PubMed ID: 15298779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neuromagnetic activity during recognition of emotional pictures.
    Kissler J; Hauswald A
    Brain Topogr; 2008 Jun; 20(4):192-204. PubMed ID: 18335310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Confidence-accuracy relations for faces and scenes: roles of features and familiarity.
    Reinitz MT; Séguin JA; Peria W; Loftus GR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Dec; 19(6):1085-93. PubMed ID: 22890870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.